Ahmad Ibrahim Primary School

10 YISHUN STREET 11 , 768643

67592906

At a glance

Ahmad Ibrahim Primary School, nestled in Yishun, is a highly sought-after choice for Primary 1 admission, boasting a 100% application rate in recent years (105 applications for 105 placements). The school consistently delivers quality education and has a reputation for nurturing academically and holistically developed students.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Yishun
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Yishun
Principal

MS BAEY EE-LYN

Vice Principals

MADAM YEO SIAU YEN, MADAM ZHANG JUNLI

Website

http://www.ahmadibrahimpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

aips@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
30% 39% 48% 56% 65% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 41% 41% 44% 44%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
44%
Taken Rate
44%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 19%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 132 62 185 154 125
Applied 29 6 1 31 29 0
Taken 29 6 1 31 29 0
Taken Rate 18% 5% 2% 17% 19% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
48%
Taken Rate
48%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 30%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 112 55 167 138 116
Applied 48 6 0 29 22 0
Taken 48 6 0 29 22 0
Taken Rate 30% 5% 0% 17% 16% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
48%
Taken Rate
48%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 34%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 106 52 157 130 115
Applied 54 10 0 27 15 0
Taken 54 10 0 27 15 0
Taken Rate 34% 9% 0% 17% 12% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
59%
Taken Rate
59%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 43%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 130 74 43 129 98 78
Applied 56 5 0 31 20 0
Taken 56 5 0 31 20 0
Taken Rate 43% 7% 0% 24% 20% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
40%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 24%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 130 130 82 164 138 126
Applied 40 0 6 0 26 12 0
Taken 40 0 6 0 26 12 0
Taken Rate 24% 0% 5% 0% 16% 9% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
38%
Taken Rate
38%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 19%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 162 161 97 194 163 149
Applied 38 1 7 0 31 14 0
Taken 38 1 7 0 31 14 0
Taken Rate 19% 1% 4% 0% 16% 9% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
41%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 25%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 151 150 92 183 151 142
Applied 49 1 7 0 32 9 0
Taken 49 1 7 0 32 9 0
Taken Rate 25% 1% 5% 0% 17% 6% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
71%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 38%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 74 147 97 60
Applied 0 0 0 0 50 37 0
Taken 55 0 8 0 50 37 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 34% 38% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
68%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 38%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 65 129 80 57
Applied 0 0 0 0 49 23 0
Taken 46 0 5 0 49 23 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 38% 29% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
33%
Taken Rate
66%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 39%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 61 121 74 62
Applied 0 0 0 1 47 12 0
Taken 46 0 13 0 47 12 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 39% 16% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
35%
Taken Rate
69%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 44%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 59 119 67 56
Applied 0 0 0 0 52 11 0
Taken 56 0 6 0 52 11 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 44% 16% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
78%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 47%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 56 112 59 39
Applied 0 0 0 0 53 20 0
Taken 59 2 7 0 53 20 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 47% 34% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
64%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 89%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 60 118 46 180
Applied 0 0 0 2 73 41 0
Taken 54 0 6 2 73 46 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 62% 89% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
57%
Taken Rate
87%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 73%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 63 124 34 23
Applied 0 0 0 1 90 11 0
Taken 42 6 7 1 90 11 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 73% 32% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
58%
Taken Rate
91%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 60%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 61 124 53 21
Applied 0 0 0 1 72 32 0
Taken 54 0 4 1 72 32 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 58% 60% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
38%
Taken Rate
70%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 47%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 61 123 66 54
Applied 0 0 0 0 58 11 0
Taken 52 0 5 0 58 11 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 47% 17% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Ahmad Ibrahim Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"the students here are really rude and have no manners whatsoever. they do not know how to respect their elderly and also secondary school students. just because i never see this one AIPS student ( seems to be around P3-P4 ) because the public bus 800 was crowded, he rudely asks me to move and smiled afterwards to his mother as if he WAS proud of how rude he treated other people in public. and then his mother didn’t do anything about it and smiled back at him?? she legit saw what he did to me as well. like his mom does NOT know how to teach her kid any respect whatsoever. and later on when I’m walking around in Northpoint peacefully and minding my own business, the same kid goes up to me and attempts to jump-scare me? like i know he’s probably trying to be playful or whatever but i do not know him personally at all which made me uncomfortable. AND the mother still didn’t do anything about it. I hope the school tries to at least teach their students some basic respect next time because apparently some parents are incapable of teaching their kids it. they’re also SUPER loud and obnoxious on public transport. does this school actually know how to teach their students any values at this point? they don’t know how to be respectful and are also public nuisances?? do better."

FRANCES
FRANCES

March 03, 2025

"2022 graduate here, shout-out to my p5-p6 freaky classmates, including the boy that starts with a and ends with n (he was very sweet tho)"

Angel Doroteo
Angel Doroteo

February 28, 2025

"2022 graduate here, P5 and P6 was a bad experience for me Teachers were awesome but the students.. I had some issues with them and got outcasted in the class I was in. Do I miss the school itself and the teachers? Yes. Do I miss a certain bunch of my classmates? No."

_desiderium
_desiderium

January 01, 2025

"This year's p6 cohort was so terrible, most of them enjoys bullying others but when the student to any teachers they would act so innocently as if they were the victim falsely accused by the real victim."

Tomato Low
Tomato Low

December 04, 2024

"My kids was studying at this school for two years and I have good impression of the school. The staffs there are very dedicated and they are not like others schools so stress and demanding. The communications with parents are very well thought out. For some reason I don’t know why this school is not popular but the school has given me memorable experience and I would have continued my kid to study there if not for the location."

DL
DL

October 09, 2024

Write A Review