Ang Mo Kio Primary School

20 ANG MO KIO AVENUE 3 , 569920

64520794

At a glance

Introducing Ang Mo Kio Primary School, a vibrant educational hub situated in the heart of Ang Mo Kio. With an application rate of 100%, calculated from 125 applications for 125 placements, securing a seat here is highly competitive.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Ang Mo Kio MRT Station; Mayflower MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Ang Mo Kio MRT Station; Mayflower MRT Station
Principal

MR MUHAMMAD FARIZAL BIN UMAR EFFE

Vice Principals

MADAM TAN SIEW KHIM (CHEN XIUQIN), MISS CHEN YANTING NATHALIE

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
35% 93% 150% 208% 265% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 91% 91% 242% 218%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
242%
Taken Rate
218%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 185%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 120 33 66 0 0
Applied 60 81 61 96 0 0
Taken 60 81 33 66 0 0
Taken Rate 33% 68% 185% 145% - -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
83%
Taken Rate
83%
Highest Demand
2A
Highest demand: 2A at 59%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 41 26 77 43 25
Applied 49 24 0 34 18 0
Taken 49 24 0 34 18 0
Taken Rate 54% 59% 0% 44% 42% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
73%
Taken Rate
73%
Highest Demand
2A
Highest demand: 2A at 57%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 58 28 85 56 41
Applied 32 33 0 29 15 0
Taken 32 33 0 29 15 0
Taken Rate 36% 57% 0% 34% 27% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
59%
Taken Rate
59%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 33%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 102 50 149 100 87
Applied 48 13 0 49 13 0
Taken 48 13 0 49 13 0
Taken Rate 32% 13% 0% 33% 13% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
58%
Taken Rate
58%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 28%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 152 152 91 181 131 101
Applied 48 0 11 0 50 30 0
Taken 48 0 11 0 50 30 0
Taken Rate 24% 0% 7% 0% 28% 23% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
67%
Taken Rate
67%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 35%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 110 110 70 143 104 73
Applied 60 0 10 0 39 31 0
Taken 60 0 10 0 39 31 0
Taken Rate 35% 0% 9% 0% 27% 30% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
91%
Taken Rate
91%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 68%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 110 64 64 45 89 44 14
Applied 46 0 15 0 45 30 0
Taken 46 0 15 0 45 30 0
Taken Rate 42% 0% 23% 0% 51% 68% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
79%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 46%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 64 128 70 38
Applied 0 0 0 0 58 32 0
Taken 44 0 8 0 58 32 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 45% 46% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
32%
Taken Rate
60%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 30%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 77 156 109 88
Applied 0 0 0 0 47 21 0
Taken 48 0 9 0 47 21 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 19% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
35%
Taken Rate
68%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 47%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 60 121 64 58
Applied 0 0 0 0 57 6 0
Taken 46 0 14 0 57 6 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 47% 9% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
79%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 59%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 70 140 58 45
Applied 0 0 0 0 82 13 0
Taken 62 0 9 0 82 13 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 59% 22% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
46%
Taken Rate
78%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 60%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 71 142 58 47
Applied 0 0 0 0 85 11 0
Taken 53 0 15 0 84 11 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 60% 19% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
79%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 52%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 66 132 64 44
Applied 0 0 0 0 68 18 0
Taken 63 0 15 0 68 20 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 52% 28% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
89%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 56%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 61 121 54 24
Applied 0 0 0 1 68 26 0
Taken 74 0 14 1 68 30 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 56% 48% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
58%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 74%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 65 129 34 210
Applied 0 0 0 1 96 24 0
Taken 65 0 15 1 95 34 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 74% 71% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
49%
Taken Rate
97%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 80%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 54 107 30 210
Applied 0 0 0 1 77 24 0
Taken 90 0 12 1 77 24 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 72% 80% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Ang Mo Kio Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"i was in this school last year and the students there were really disrespectful, once a student asked me and my friends to commit suicide. The teachers would also ask us to do alot of thing, my teacher asked us to carry her own bag for her and if we didnt we would get scolded. I would not recommed this school."

kyan leong

January 15, 2025

"hello i would like to say something this school has the best teachers that will teach you and educate you and they are very patient plus i learned something they are scolding me not for fun but too make sure i get disciplined for exams and i would like to say a big thank you to Mr Razif And Ms Anand They Really Supported Me Through My Journey When My Studies Were Bad They Were Patient with me And They Cared About Me I really appreciate all the teachers that helped me through my journey thank you i will miss this school dearly and remember it for the rest of my lives"

Central hi

November 20, 2024

"From my experience with amkp, the school mostly take verbal bullying lightly. I got bullied a host of time while I was still a student in this school and was left with no choice but to eat in the toilet. This school doesn't really place importance in children's mental health. I was depressed while I was a student here and no teacher reached out at all. Pls never ever enrol your child here, I'm saying this with my whole heart. The school did not really encounrage empathy too. Most of the teachers I have encountered with stayed silent when I get bullied. This school would be the last thing on my list to recommend for your child."

Stna Gyy

June 17, 2024

"This school is terrific I remember vry clearly that the teachers are nice and respectful but I also remember that they have to do a lot of work so appreciate them so yea!nice!graduated in 2099 I’m from da future!ps that was a joke so pls like my review and join dis school!"

Mason Wong

March 17, 2024

"My child studied in this school and it haunted me as one of the worst decisions I made as a parent. The bullies are protected because of their more unfortunate backgrounds so the others must learn to be empathetic towards them, this creates an unsafe environment. Profanities abound, you can easily hear them at the school bus stop. School is more focused on punctuality, wearing the school uniform despite hot weather, getting scolded for not turning up the stand-up collar, than academic and behaviour excellence. With the exception of 2 teachers who taught my child, the others were unsuitable to teach; They need more training in managing primary students. My child's P6 teacher told the class that they were doomed, useless and even said how disappointed she was at an ex-student now being a food deliverer. Overall an unhealthy environment for students."

S S
S S

May 20, 2023

"Good play to play badminton with friends . Need to book in advance"

Minh Nguyen

March 06, 2022

Write A Review