Anglo-Chinese School Primary, located in the heart of Singapore, boasts a high application rate of 108%, calculated from 261 applications for 241 available placements. Known for its rigorous academic curriculum and a strong emphasis on character development, the school continually produces high achievers.
It provides unique programs in Sports, Arts, and STEM, enriching the overall learning experience for its students. Recent news highlights the school's competitive edge, reflecting in their students' consistent top performances in national competitions.
The school's location and reputation make it a highly sought-after choice for parents seeking Primary 1 admission.
Anglochinese School Primary
Principal:
Ms Ho Hil May
Vice Principals:
Mdm Teh Hsiao Chuin, Mr Chua Thian Keong
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Newton MRT Station
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Vacancy | 180 | 108 | 29 | 59 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 73 | 80 | 34 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 261 | |
| % Applied | 41% | 74% | 117% | 125% | 0% | 0% | 109% | |
| Taken | 73 | 80 | 29 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 74% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 180 | 124 | 26 | 53 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 56 | 106 | 51 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 281 | |
| % Applied | 31% | 85% | 196% | 128% | 0% | 0% | 117% | |
| Taken | 56 | 106 | 26 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 85% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 118 | 28 | 55 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 62 | 95 | 55 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 281 | |
| % Applied | 34% | 81% | 196% | 125% | 0% | 0% | 117% | |
| Taken | 62 | 95 | 28 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 81% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 141 | 38 | 26 | 25 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 59 | 103 | 27 | 44 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 273 | |
| % Applied | 30% | 73% | 71% | 169% | 160% | 0% | 0% | 114% | |
| Taken | 59 | 103 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 73% | 71% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 132 | 37 | 25 | 26 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 68 | 95 | 28 | 50 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 287 | |
| % Applied | 34% | 72% | 76% | 200% | 177% | 0% | 0% | 120% | |
| Taken | 68 | 95 | 28 | 25 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 72% | 76% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 200 | 143 | 37 | 28 | 27 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 57 | 106 | 22 | 37 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 264 | |
| % Applied | 29% | 74% | 59% | 132% | 156% | 0% | 0% | 110% | |
| Taken | 57 | 106 | 22 | 28 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 74% | 59% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 32 | 32 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 92 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 147% | 141% | 0% | 0% | 38% | |
| Taken | 68 | 90 | 18 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 38% | 8% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 40 | 39 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 115% | 118% | 0% | 0% | 38% | |
| Taken | 62 | 82 | 17 | 40 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 34% | 7% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 21 | 20 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 54 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 129% | 135% | 0% | 0% | 23% | |
| Taken | 74 | 119 | 6 | 21 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 50% | 3% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 29 | 29 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 66 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 114% | 114% | 0% | 0% | 28% | |
| Taken | 62 | 93 | 27 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 39% | 11% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 32 | 30 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 89 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 109% | 180% | 0% | 0% | 37% | |
| Taken | 55 | 77 | 44 | 34 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 23% | 32% | 18% | 106% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 24 | 22 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 62 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 129% | 141% | 0% | 0% | 26% | |
| Taken | 72 | 72 | 48 | 26 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 30% | 20% | 108% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 18 | 17 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 43 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 122% | 124% | 0% | 0% | 18% | |
| Taken | 72 | 76 | 57 | 18 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 32% | 24% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 25 | 24 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 65 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 140% | 125% | 0% | 0% | 27% | |
| Taken | 63 | 74 | 54 | 25 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 31% | 23% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 20 | 19 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 55 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 125% | 158% | 0% | 0% | 23% | |
| Taken | 55 | 82 | 64 | 20 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 23% | 34% | 27% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Anglochinese School Primary.
"School admin is very impatient and rude! Was checking on operating hours etc and admin can’t wait to hang up my call and spoke in very rude manner! without checking, every questions i asked is “I don’t know I don’t know”!"
December 15, 2023
"Rly nice place and if you go in front of oldham hall you can do ice fights there. Buy ice in the large cup for 20 cents and just say that you want to put it in your water bottle. Go throw ice at your friends very fun rate 10/10"
July 27, 2021
"Great place, skipped morning assembly multiple times by hiding around in places around the school. Jilliane Chew once punished me for standing up because I wanted to get a better look of the computer while doing a class project involving coding."
December 28, 2018
"After you graduate from here you can go to barker here has a very convenient location.After school you could walk to balmoral plaza to eat or drink there is also a bustop and mrt station near by recommend to send your son here don't need to move house after graduating can just go to barker same campus hope i helped someone choose the right school"
April 04, 2022
"Best school ever has many things to do and a lot of canteen stalls and food varieties to choose"
August 03, 2023
"Honestly based on my experience i do not recommend this school.Across my six years at acs primary school i have experienced the most depressing period of my life.People in this school do not like individuals from other schools such as st Andrew’s students for completely no absolute reason.Send ur kid/teen to this school if u want to get direct affiliation to acs barker which is a kampong version of acs independent.Teachers are mean and inconsiderate.Owners of acs are not handling the school up to its high expectations made from the past."
April 10, 2025