Situated in Bedok, Bedok Green Primary School stands out with its 100% application rate, signifying its attractiveness to Singaporean parents. Notably, the school has a strong emphasis on holistic development, providing a myriad of programs such as sports, performing arts, and a STEM-based curriculum.
Recently, the school's badminton team clinched a championship, adding to its impressive list of achievements. The school's popularity and competitiveness are evident in its full subscription.
Bedok Green Primary ensures a vibrant learning environment, making it a top choice for Primary 1 admissions. Please note, competition for spots is high due to its popularity.
Bedok Green Primary School
Principal:
Mr Yong Yik Yen Benjamin
Vice Principals:
Mr Yeo Sho Hor, Mr Chua Kok Seng
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Bedok MRT Station, Tanah Merah MRT Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 180 | 140 | 65 | 195 | 166 | 116 | 116 |
| Applied | 40 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 50 | 0 | 125 | |
| % Applied | 22% | 4% | 0% | 15% | 30% | 0% | 108% | |
| Taken | 40 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 50 | 0 | 125 | |
| % Taken | 22% | 4% | 0% | 15% | 30% | 0% | 108% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 120 | 63 | 38 | 113 | 79 | 49 | 180 |
| Applied | 57 | 10 | 0 | 34 | 30 | 0 | 131 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 16% | 0% | 30% | 38% | 0% | 73% | |
| Taken | 57 | 10 | 0 | 34 | 30 | 0 | 131 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 16% | 0% | 30% | 38% | 0% | 73% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 94 | 48 | 143 | 116 | 80 | 210 |
| Applied | 57 | 11 | 0 | 27 | 36 | 0 | 131 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 12% | 0% | 19% | 31% | 0% | 62% | |
| Taken | 57 | 11 | 0 | 27 | 36 | 0 | 131 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 12% | 0% | 19% | 31% | 0% | 62% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 109 | 51 | 152 | 120 | 46 | 240 |
| Applied | 71 | 17 | 0 | 32 | 74 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 16% | 0% | 21% | 62% | 0% | 81% | |
| Taken | 71 | 17 | 0 | 32 | 74 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 16% | 0% | 21% | 62% | 0% | 81% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 230 | 177 | 177 | 102 | 204 | 170 | 106 | 270 |
| Applied | 53 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 35 | 64 | 0 | 166 | |
| % Applied | 23% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 17% | 38% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 53 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 35 | 64 | 0 | 166 | |
| % Taken | 23% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 17% | 38% | 0% | 61% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 134 | 134 | 77 | 154 | 131 | 46 | 240 |
| Applied | 66 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 23 | 85 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Applied | 33% | 0% | 15% | 0% | 15% | 65% | 0% | 81% | |
| Taken | 66 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 23 | 85 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 15% | 0% | 15% | 65% | 0% | 81% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 118 | 118 | 74 | 149 | 98 | 43 | 210 |
| Applied | 52 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 52 | 55 | 0 | 170 | |
| % Applied | 31% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 35% | 56% | 0% | 81% | |
| Taken | 52 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 52 | 55 | 0 | 170 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 35% | 56% | 0% | 81% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 81 | 164 | 100 | 33 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 67 | 0 | 131 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 39% | 67% | 0% | 55% | |
| Taken | 61 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 64 | 67 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 25% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 39% | 67% | 0% | 88% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 41 | 84 | 28 | 13 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 15 | 0 | 71 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 67% | 54% | 0% | 39% | |
| Taken | 86 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 56 | 15 | 0 | 169 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 1% | 6% | 0% | 67% | 54% | 0% | 94% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 69 | 137 | 93 | 84 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 44 | 9 | 0 | 54 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 32% | 10% | 0% | 26% | |
| Taken | 66 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 44 | 9 | 0 | 126 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 32% | 10% | 0% | 60% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 74 | 149 | 69 | 43 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 82 | 26 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 55% | 38% | 0% | 45% | |
| Taken | 79 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 80 | 26 | 0 | 199 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 54% | 38% | 0% | 83% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 72 | 145 | 58 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88 | 64 | 0 | 152 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 61% | 110% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 84 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 86 | 58 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 59% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 73 | 145 | 35 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 111 | 42 | 0 | 154 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 77% | 120% | 0% | 64% | |
| Taken | 83 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 111 | 35 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 5% | 1% | 77% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 77 | 151 | 39 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 114 | 49 | 0 | 166 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 76% | 126% | 0% | 69% | |
| Taken | 70 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 114 | 39 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 7% | 3% | 76% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 66 | 131 | 28 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 103 | 43 | 0 | 148 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 79% | 154% | 0% | 70% | |
| Taken | 69 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 103 | 28 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 4% | 3% | 79% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 64 | 126 | 48 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 49 | 0 | 129 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 62% | 102% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 66 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 78 | 48 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 1% | 7% | 3% | 62% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Bedok Green Primary School.
"Badminton court well maintained."
August 31, 2024
"I love this place because I'm a student there and the teachers there are just the best."
November 14, 2024
"I am an alumni of bgps, the teachers there are nice and understanding, their teaching is very good!! I recommend parents to join their kids in this primary school!! There is a lot of experience in bgps and different activities to do together everyday with friends!!!!! The students can get awards and certificates, i got the warrior award and ECHA two/three times alr! I really miss BGPS tho! SHOUT OUT TO MR WONG, MDM ZAHIDAH SHAMSUL, MS LI AND MR NG!! "
May 09, 2024
"As an alumni of bgps i would like to say that i had a great experience but now looking at my juniors i realised that they did not like my batch of p6s at all as we did not have this many opportunitys to go on feild trips and have interactive lessons as the newer p5-p6s do but i can say that this is an amazing schools with amazing teachers that taught me how to grow as a person but the new disipline master is quite terrifying to this day"
May 25, 2024
"I was a BGPS Student since 2018. The teachers are kind. All my friend are awesome. The development of the buildings is very modern. They now added ramps for wheelchair at Gate 5 and School Hall, making it accessible. I love BGPS! :D"
August 19, 2023
"There is koobits and kind teachers I used to be student there but I changed school now I missed my friend😭😭"
April 01, 2025