Bedok Green Primary School

1 BEDOK SOUTH AVE 2 , 469317

64425416

At a glance

Situated in Bedok, Bedok Green Primary School stands out with its 100% application rate, signifying its attractiveness to Singaporean parents. Notably, the school has a strong emphasis on holistic development, providing a myriad of programs such as sports, performing arts, and a STEM-based curriculum.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Bedok MRT Station, Tanah Merah MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Bedok MRT Station, Tanah Merah MRT Station
Principal

MR YONG YIK YEN BENJAMIN

Vice Principals

MR YEO SHO HOR, CHUA KOK SENG

Website

http://www.bedokgreenpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

bgps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
45% 56% 68% 79% 90% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 81% 81% 52% 52%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
52%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 30%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 140 65 195 166 116
Applied 40 5 0 30 50 0
Taken 40 5 0 30 50 0
Taken Rate 22% 4% 0% 15% 30% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
73%
Taken Rate
73%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 48%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 63 38 113 79 49
Applied 57 10 0 34 30 0
Taken 57 10 0 34 30 0
Taken Rate 48% 16% 0% 30% 38% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
62%
Taken Rate
62%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 38%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 94 48 143 116 80
Applied 57 11 0 27 36 0
Taken 57 11 0 27 36 0
Taken Rate 38% 12% 0% 19% 31% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
81%
Taken Rate
81%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 62%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 109 51 152 120 46
Applied 71 17 0 32 74 0
Taken 71 17 0 32 74 0
Taken Rate 39% 16% 0% 21% 62% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
61%
Taken Rate
61%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 38%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 230 177 177 102 204 170 106
Applied 53 0 14 0 35 64 0
Taken 53 0 14 0 35 64 0
Taken Rate 23% 0% 8% 0% 17% 38% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
81%
Taken Rate
81%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 65%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 134 134 77 154 131 46
Applied 66 0 20 0 23 85 0
Taken 66 0 20 0 23 85 0
Taken Rate 33% 0% 15% 0% 15% 65% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
81%
Taken Rate
81%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 56%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 118 118 74 149 98 43
Applied 52 0 11 0 52 55 0
Taken 52 0 11 0 52 55 0
Taken Rate 31% 0% 9% 0% 35% 56% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
55%
Taken Rate
88%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 67%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 81 164 100 33
Applied 0 0 0 0 64 67 0
Taken 61 0 18 0 64 67 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 39% 67% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
39%
Taken Rate
94%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 67%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 41 84 28 13
Applied 0 0 0 0 56 15 0
Taken 86 1 11 0 56 15 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 67% 54% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
26%
Taken Rate
60%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 32%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 69 137 93 84
Applied 0 0 0 1 44 9 0
Taken 66 0 7 0 44 9 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 32% 10% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
83%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 55%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 74 149 69 43
Applied 0 0 0 1 82 26 0
Taken 79 0 14 0 80 26 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 55% 38% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
63%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 110%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 72 145 58 240
Applied 0 0 0 0 88 64 0
Taken 84 0 12 0 86 58 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 61% 110% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
64%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 120%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 73 145 35 240
Applied 0 0 0 1 111 42 0
Taken 83 0 11 1 111 35 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 77% 120% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
69%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 126%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 77 151 39 240
Applied 0 0 0 3 114 49 0
Taken 70 1 16 2 114 39 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 4% 75% 126% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
70%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 154%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 66 131 28 210
Applied 0 0 0 2 103 43 0
Taken 69 0 9 2 103 28 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 79% 154% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
61%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 102%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 64 126 48 210
Applied 0 0 0 2 78 49 0
Taken 66 2 14 2 78 48 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 62% 102% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Bedok Green Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"There is koobits and kind teachers I used to be student there but I changed school now I missed my friend😭😭"

Jayden Loh
Jayden Loh

April 01, 2025

"I love this place because I'm a student there and the teachers there are just the best."

Adam Mikhail
Adam Mikhail

November 14, 2024

"Badminton court well maintained."

William
William

August 31, 2024

"As an alumni of bgps i would like to say that i had a great experience but now looking at my juniors i realised that they did not like my batch of p6s at all as we did not have this many opportunitys to go on feild trips and have interactive lessons as the newer p5-p6s do but i can say that this is an amazing schools with amazing teachers that taught me how to grow as a person but the new disipline master is quite terrifying to this day"

Clarkinite
Clarkinite

May 25, 2024

"I am an alumni of bgps, the teachers there are nice and understanding, their teaching is very good!! I recommend parents to join their kids in this primary school!! There is a lot of experience in bgps and different activities to do together everyday with friends!!!!! The students can get awards and certificates, i got the warrior award and ECHA two/three times alr! I really miss BGPS tho! SHOUT OUT TO MR WONG, MDM ZAHIDAH SHAMSUL, MS LI AND MR NG!! "

Siti Umairah Abdullah (Temasekss)
Siti Umairah Abdullah (Temasekss)

May 09, 2024

"I was a BGPS Student since 2018. The teachers are kind. All my friend are awesome. The development of the buildings is very modern. They now added ramps for wheelchair at Gate 5 and School Hall, making it accessible. I love BGPS! :D"

Irfan Maliq
Irfan Maliq

August 19, 2023

Write A Review