Bendemeer Primary School

91 BENDEMEER ROAD , 339948

62982911

At a glance

Bendemeer Primary School, located in the heart of Kallang, is a leading educational institution that consistently records an application rate of 100%. This is a testament to its popularity and competitiveness, with 121 applications for 121 placements last year.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Boon Keng, Kallang
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Boon Keng, Kallang
Principal

MADAM LIM KIM GEK

Vice Principals

MRS LINDA TAN, MR TOH KIM SING (ZHUO JINSHENG)

Website

http://www.bendemeerpri.moe.edu.sg/

Email

bendemeer_ps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
55% 68% 80% 93% 105% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 100% 100% 69% 69%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
69%
Taken Rate
69%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 47%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 89 44 133 107 57
Applied 31 17 0 27 50 0
Taken 31 17 0 27 50 0
Taken Rate 26% 19% 0% 20% 47% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
64%
Taken Rate
64%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 36%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 130 83 40 121 95 70
Applied 47 23 0 26 25 0
Taken 47 23 0 26 25 0
Taken Rate 36% 28% 0% 21% 26% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
68%
Taken Rate
68%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 44%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 130 94 47 143 113 63
Applied 36 12 1 30 50 0
Taken 36 12 1 30 50 0
Taken Rate 28% 13% 2% 21% 44% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
86%
Taken Rate
86%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 64%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 130 78 44 133 74 27
Applied 52 5 0 59 47 0
Taken 52 5 0 59 47 0
Taken Rate 40% 6% 0% 44% 64% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
77%
Taken Rate
77%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 52%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 141 141 87 173 123 59
Applied 59 0 8 0 53 64 0
Taken 59 0 8 0 53 64 0
Taken Rate 30% 0% 6% 0% 31% 52% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
93%
Taken Rate
93%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 81%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 83 83 55 109 64 12
Applied 57 0 13 1 45 52 0
Taken 57 0 13 1 45 52 0
Taken Rate 41% 0% 16% 2% 41% 81% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
100%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 98%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 89 89 56 113 50 1
Applied 51 0 17 0 63 49 0
Taken 51 0 17 0 63 49 0
Taken Rate 36% 0% 19% 0% 56% 98% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
68%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 116%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 65 131 68 210
Applied 0 0 0 1 63 79 0
Taken 59 0 21 0 63 68 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 48% 116% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
39%
Taken Rate
77%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 44%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 65 131 89 50
Applied 0 0 0 0 42 39 0
Taken 67 0 13 0 42 39 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 32% 44% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
38%
Taken Rate
72%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 49%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 60 119 61 51
Applied 0 0 0 0 58 10 0
Taken 50 0 11 0 58 10 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 49% 16% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
71%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 40%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 78 156 94 61
Applied 0 0 0 0 62 33 0
Taken 45 0 10 0 62 33 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 40% 35% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
87%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 68%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 68 136 45 28
Applied 0 0 0 0 93 17 0
Taken 59 0 15 0 91 17 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 68% 38% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
57%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 91%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 53 104 43 180
Applied 0 0 0 2 62 39 0
Taken 61 0 13 2 62 43 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 4% 60% 91% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
63%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 86%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 49 98 28 150
Applied 0 0 0 0 71 24 0
Taken 41 0 11 0 71 28 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 72% 86% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
63%
Taken Rate
94%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 73%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 54 109 51 10
Applied 0 0 0 0 58 37 0
Taken 38 0 4 0 58 41 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 53% 73% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
47%
Taken Rate
83%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 52%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 49 97 47 25
Applied 0 0 0 0 50 21 0
Taken 47 0 6 0 50 21 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 52% 45% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Bendemeer Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"I am a currently a student at BPS.The teachers here are really nice esp Ms Hon,Mr Goh, Mr Fahmy and Mdm Farhanah."

Insiyah Hozefa Shakir (Bendemeerps)
Insiyah Hozefa Shakir (Bendemeerps)

April 27, 2025

"It's quite a bad school in my opinion students r dumbtheyd ress like their going to a party they swear ,have TikTok being underaged like the only good thing I have heard about the school is affordable food in the school like go there and you'll see how many students score well it's like their school has no rules or anything"

bhaya Alisha
bhaya Alisha

April 16, 2025

"Love this school!!!! Ms Hon and Mdm DIng are my Math and Mother Tongue teachers respectively. If you somehow manage to get either of them. Good Job! (Ms Hon might not be there, but there's still Mdm Ding) Wushu CCA is nice, if you don't mind martial art related things. I really love the library, it has a lot of my favourite books and if you accidentally forget to do any homework related to the computer, for school purposes of course, you can access the computers there."

Lian Xinying (Bendemeerps)
Lian Xinying (Bendemeerps)

March 27, 2025

"There is this very biased teacher in this school. I will not mention her name because even though she is very mean and petty, I believe that she is still considered nice to lower primary students and I don't want to ruin her image. Just because I left my CCA to focus more on my studies, she started targeting me in PE class and found a reason to scold me every lesson. She even went as far as to try to make my friends leave me! Luckily, they are true friends and didn't leave me. Now, the reason I gave this school a 5 star review is because other than her, the school is wonderful. Especially my form teachers. They always support me. Hopefully, the biased teacher will change. Thank you for taking your time to read this review. BTW, I think the biased teacher was the head of CCA and didn't like it when I left."

Snow
Snow

March 27, 2025

"Highly recommend to let your children come this school,I was this year P6 student and a teacher is care about me and she teach my sister before the teacher is MDM Liza and she care about every student who in his maths class even tho she sometimes scold us but she still a nice teacher! If you happen to teach by that teacher,you're on the right track!"

Qiao Feng Leong
Qiao Feng Leong

October 28, 2024

"I was a student in 2015 but left after primary one. My experience was horrific at this school before I transferred. I lost my wallet once and my form teacher found it and called me and a classmate out. My classmate told lies saying I threatened her into taking my wallet if not I'd hit her(absolutely outrageous) and the teacher side with her story accusing me of lying and threatened to call the police and I got sent to the vice principals office where this indian women said if I don't tell the truth, she would cane me. Ngl this school's teachers are bias and after I left I still heard that this school didn't improve at all but rather got worse. Highly recommended to not send your children here 🙏."

Skakwokqmmsmwj Aidjnssigmajjeiwuwfysuwkcsjk
Skakwokqmmsmwj Aidjnssigmajjeiwuwfysuwkcsjk

October 23, 2024

"This is primary school 🏫 during my 70s. All of things including the structure of building 🏢🏫 has changed since I left for further education but I still have memories"

Charles Tan
Charles Tan

January 05, 2021

Write A Review