Bukit Panjang Primary School, located in the heart of Bukit Panjang, boasts an impressive application rate of 123% - reflecting its competitive nature. This school, known for its strong emphasis on holistic education, had a surge of 859 applications for just 698 available placements.
With a recent commendation for its unique environmental education program, Bukit Panjang Primary is a beacon for parents seeking a balanced yet rigorous curriculum. Its prime location paired with a history of notable achievements underscores its appeal to Singaporean parents aspiring for a fulfilling primary education for their children.
Bukit Panjang Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Len Leng Leng Teresa Kelly
Vice Principals:
Mdm Kay Hwee Geak, Mr Chan Weng Kit Mark
Session Type:
Single Session
Email:
Nearest MRT:
From Pending LRT station to Choa Chu Kang MRT station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 180 | 81 | 26 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 99 | 62 | 20 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 259 | |
| % Applied | 55% | 77% | 77% | 128% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 99 | 62 | 20 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 77% | 77% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 180 | 110 | 20 | 46 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 111 | 131 | 38 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 859 | |
| % Applied | 62% | 119% | 190% | 222% | 0% | 0% | 358% | |
| Taken | 111 | 110 | 20 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 287 | |
| % Taken | 62% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 291% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 180 | 116 | 21 | 42 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 100 | 135 | 46 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 874 | |
| % Applied | 56% | 116% | 219% | 212% | 0% | 0% | 364% | |
| Taken | 100 | 116 | 21 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 279 | |
| % Taken | 56% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 288% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 110 | 29 | 65 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 100 | 149 | 46 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 867 | |
| % Applied | 56% | 135% | 159% | 123% | 0% | 0% | 361% | |
| Taken | 100 | 110 | 21 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 296 | |
| % Taken | 56% | 100% | 72% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 288% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 119 | 240 | 33 | 47 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 97 | 123 | 60 | 40 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 868 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 103% | 25% | 121% | 151% | 0% | 0% | 362% | |
| Taken | 97 | 119 | 60 | 21 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 344 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 100% | 25% | 64% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 289% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 130 | 210 | 64 | 127 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 104 | 125 | 39 | 41 | 85 | 35 | 0 | 977 | |
| % Applied | 52% | 96% | 19% | 64% | 67% | 15% | 0% | 407% | |
| Taken | 104 | 125 | 39 | 24 | 67 | 35 | 0 | 394 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 96% | 19% | 38% | 53% | 15% | 0% | 360% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 200 | 111 | 90 | 46 | 92 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 98 | 104 | 42 | 40 | 87 | 13 | 0 | 913 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 94% | 47% | 87% | 95% | 5% | 0% | 380% | |
| Taken | 98 | 104 | 42 | 20 | 70 | 13 | 0 | 347 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 94% | 47% | 43% | 76% | 5% | 0% | 335% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 63 | 125 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 86 | 36 | 0 | 363 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 57% | 69% | 15% | 0% | 151% | |
| Taken | 87 | 118 | 39 | 22 | 71 | 36 | 0 | 373 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 49% | 16% | 35% | 57% | 15% | 0% | 361% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 55 | 109 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 96 | 15 | 0 | 303 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 51% | 88% | 6% | 0% | 126% | |
| Taken | 101 | 102 | 47 | 23 | 75 | 15 | 0 | 363 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 43% | 20% | 42% | 69% | 6% | 0% | 341% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 59 | 119 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 103 | 13 | 0 | 290 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 54% | 87% | 5% | 0% | 121% | |
| Taken | 107 | 100 | 29 | 25 | 92 | 13 | 0 | 366 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 42% | 12% | 42% | 77% | 5% | 0% | 344% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 75 | 150 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 98 | 24 | 0 | 317 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 39% | 65% | 10% | 0% | 132% | |
| Taken | 100 | 97 | 45 | 21 | 87 | 24 | 0 | 374 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 40% | 19% | 28% | 58% | 10% | 0% | 354% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 80 | 160 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 83 | 31 | 0 | 360 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 43% | 52% | 13% | 0% | 150% | |
| Taken | 123 | 98 | 38 | 21 | 68 | 31 | 0 | 379 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 41% | 16% | 26% | 43% | 13% | 0% | 386% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 93 | 185 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 97 | 35 | 0 | 408 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 46% | 52% | 15% | 0% | 170% | |
| Taken | 97 | 87 | 35 | 26 | 90 | 117 | 0 | 452 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 36% | 15% | 28% | 49% | 49% | 0% | 421% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 77 | 153 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 74 | 49 | 0 | 441 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 56% | 48% | 18% | 0% | 163% | |
| Taken | 107 | 80 | 74 | 43 | 56 | 60 | 0 | 420 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 30% | 27% | 56% | 37% | 22% | 0% | 370% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 79 | 158 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 101 | 58 | 0 | 484 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 65% | 64% | 21% | 0% | 179% | |
| Taken | 121 | 79 | 68 | 40 | 44 | 90 | 0 | 442 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 29% | 25% | 51% | 28% | 33% | 0% | 380% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 65 | 129 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 14 | 0 | 412 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 74% | 79% | 5% | 0% | 153% | |
| Taken | 120 | 69 | 47 | 45 | 65 | 14 | 0 | 360 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 26% | 17% | 69% | 50% | 5% | 0% | 314% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Bukit Panjang Primary School.
"I live by this school and every Friday, at 7:45am, they will be letting on this relentless drumming and they’ve been doing this for years. I’d emailed them and personally went down to this school to ask them to stop doing that because I have an ageing parent who lives with me that gets woken up by them promptly by the tenth drumbeat and they stopped for a short period. Why? Did they think my ageing parent got younger and less affected by it over time??? But they’ve been at it again for years. And it will last an hour. Thoughtless, inconsiderate and selfish school management."
March 28, 2025
"some parts are very bad but some teachers are nice. the turtles are the best part of the school and there are fights sometimes. imagine if ms chang sees this lol my sister went there this year and the first thing she said was JAQUESAH DONT DO SILLITHINGSAH"
March 25, 2025
"I'm actually a student at bpps. The toilet at level 4 near the p5 classes is really smelly. I rarely go to the toilet over there during mtl lessons(Malay). I also don't like that toilet is bc of the light sensor. Once I was taking a shit in the toilet for awhile, then suddenly the lights went out.i quickly wipe my butt with the wet tissue and went out(a very traumatic experience for me💀)"
November 19, 2024
"im an alumni that graduated last year. overall the school is a very good school as the teachers are very caring for their students and the environment the school is in is very safe and secure"
March 19, 2025
"Decent primary school in Bukit Panjang area. Would love to see them stronger in non-curriculum areas such as STEM and CCA's."
June 30, 2022