Located in the heart of Bukit Batok, Bukit View Primary School has an application rate of 102%, reflecting its high demand. This outstanding school is well-known for its vibrant arts program and a strong emphasis on character development.
Recently, Bukit View Primary was applauded for its exceptional performance in the National Primary Schools Track and Field Championships. The school's popularity is evident from its slightly over-subscribed enrolment trend, indicating an intensely competitive admission process.
A top choice for many Singaporean parents, Bukit View Primary School seamlessly blends academic rigour and holistic development, offering a nurturing environment for every child.
Bukit View Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Teo Eng Hui
Vice Principals:
Mdm Lai Seow Poh, Mdm Ewe Jun Wen
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Bukit Batok MRT Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 220 | 148 | 67 | 202 | 111 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 72 | 6 | 0 | 92 | 121 | 0 | 291 | |
| % Applied | 33% | 4% | 0% | 46% | 109% | - | - | |
| Taken | 72 | 6 | 0 | 92 | 111 | 0 | 281 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 4% | 0% | 46% | 100% | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 260 | 187 | 76 | 229 | 173 | 320 | 320 |
| Applied | 73 | 18 | 0 | 57 | 178 | 0 | 326 | |
| % Applied | 28% | 10% | 0% | 25% | 103% | 0% | 102% | |
| Taken | 73 | 18 | 0 | 57 | 173 | 0 | 321 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 10% | 0% | 25% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 260 | 198 | 80 | 242 | 215 | 88 | 320 |
| Applied | 62 | 17 | 0 | 27 | 127 | 0 | 233 | |
| % Applied | 24% | 9% | 0% | 11% | 59% | 0% | 73% | |
| Taken | 62 | 17 | 0 | 27 | 127 | 0 | 233 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 9% | 0% | 11% | 59% | 0% | 73% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 240 | 182 | 77 | 230 | 199 | 66 | 300 |
| Applied | 58 | 12 | 0 | 31 | 133 | 0 | 234 | |
| % Applied | 24% | 7% | 0% | 13% | 67% | 0% | 78% | |
| Taken | 58 | 12 | 0 | 31 | 133 | 0 | 234 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 7% | 0% | 13% | 67% | 0% | 78% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 137 | 137 | 83 | 166 | 129 | 37 | 240 |
| Applied | 63 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 37 | 92 | 0 | 203 | |
| % Applied | 32% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 22% | 71% | 0% | 85% | |
| Taken | 63 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 37 | 92 | 0 | 203 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 22% | 71% | 0% | 85% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 143 | 143 | 88 | 176 | 151 | 69 | 240 |
| Applied | 57 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 26 | 82 | 0 | 172 | |
| % Applied | 29% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 15% | 54% | 0% | 72% | |
| Taken | 57 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 26 | 82 | 0 | 172 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 15% | 54% | 0% | 72% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 89 | 89 | 61 | 122 | 99 | 34 | 180 |
| Applied | 51 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 24 | 65 | 0 | 147 | |
| % Applied | 36% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 20% | 66% | 0% | 82% | |
| Taken | 51 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 24 | 65 | 0 | 147 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 20% | 66% | 0% | 82% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 75 | 150 | 94 | 38 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 56 | 0 | 112 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 37% | 60% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 46 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 56 | 56 | 0 | 173 | |
| % Taken | 22% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 37% | 60% | 0% | 82% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 54 | 110 | 45 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 65 | 47 | 0 | 113 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 59% | 104% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 64 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 65 | 45 | 0 | 182 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 59% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 57 | 115 | 69 | 48 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 21 | 0 | 67 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 30% | 0% | 37% | |
| Taken | 58 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 46 | 21 | 0 | 133 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 40% | 30% | 0% | 74% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 62 | 123 | 46 | 22 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 24 | 0 | 101 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 63% | 52% | 0% | 48% | |
| Taken | 80 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 77 | 24 | 0 | 188 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 63% | 52% | 0% | 90% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 86 | 170 | 87 | 68 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 83 | 19 | 0 | 103 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 49% | 22% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 62 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 83 | 19 | 0 | 172 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 49% | 22% | 0% | 72% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 62 | 123 | 29 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 95 | 26 | 0 | 122 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 77% | 90% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 94 | 29 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 7% | 2% | 76% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 65 | 128 | 40 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 89 | 41 | 0 | 132 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 70% | 103% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 73 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 88 | 40 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 69% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 67 | 134 | 47 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 62 | 0 | 149 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 65% | 132% | 0% | 71% | |
| Taken | 67 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 87 | 47 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 65% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 74 | 148 | 41 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 58 | 0 | 165 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 72% | 141% | 0% | 79% | |
| Taken | 55 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 107 | 41 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 72% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Bukit View Primary School.
"It’s a nice school, graduated last year. The teachers are all supportive and the facilities are great. The balcony on the fourth floor was my to go place during break lol. The students abit toxic but other than that it’s alright. Love how they take bullying seriously and stuff. Will recommend going here for primary school."
December 15, 2024
"Best school.lots of fun activity like in Chinese new year got lion dance and the toilets and canteen is very clean."
March 17, 2025
"the best school I have grown in,as an ex student and since I graduated this year,all I got to say is:all my teachers were outstandingly supportive and I learned a lot from this school.its learning journeys in primary 1 were a great choice to help primary 1bond with teachers and friends like to the Singapore zoo and national museum.The facilities were well designed and are convenient liem the library and many more.overall a great primary school. (Yes I'm using my father's account)"
December 18, 2024
"This school allows students to bring phone to school a major distraction and the students are very rude"
March 27, 2025
"Kids talk at East Coast Park like matrep P4 somemore"
February 21, 2025