Cantonment Primary School, nestled in the heart of Singapore, boasts a 100% application rate, signifying its high appeal among parents for Primary 1 admission. Notable for its emphasis on holistic education, Cantonment's students continually excel in co-curricular activities, demonstrating the school's commitment to nurturing well-rounded individuals.
In recent years, the school has made headlines for its innovative STEM programs, fostering critical thinking and creativity for tomorrow's leaders. Parents are drawn to this highly competitive educational institution for its modern facilities, close-knit community, and its proven track record of excellence.
Cantonment Primary School
Principal:
Ms Foo Yin Ping Grace
Vice Principals:
Miss Cheng Shin Miin, Ms Jane Chia Pei En
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Tanjong Pagar Outram Park
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 90 | 61 | 39 | 116 | 87 | 65 | 65 |
| Applied | 29 | 5 | 0 | 29 | 22 | 0 | 85 | |
| % Applied | 32% | 8% | 0% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 131% | |
| Taken | 29 | 5 | 0 | 29 | 22 | 0 | 85 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 8% | 0% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 131% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 90 | 51 | 36 | 109 | 86 | 65 | 150 |
| Applied | 39 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 21 | 0 | 85 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 4% | 0% | 21% | 24% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 39 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 21 | 0 | 85 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 4% | 0% | 21% | 24% | 0% | 57% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 90 | 45 | 34 | 100 | 60 | 41 | 150 |
| Applied | 45 | 4 | 2 | 40 | 19 | 0 | 110 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 9% | 6% | 40% | 32% | 0% | 73% | |
| Taken | 45 | 4 | 2 | 40 | 19 | 0 | 110 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 9% | 6% | 40% | 32% | 0% | 73% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 120 | 76 | 45 | 136 | 93 | 46 | 180 |
| Applied | 44 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 47 | 0 | 136 | |
| % Applied | 37% | 3% | 0% | 32% | 51% | 0% | 76% | |
| Taken | 44 | 2 | 0 | 43 | 47 | 0 | 136 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 3% | 0% | 32% | 51% | 0% | 76% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 140 | 140 | 89 | 177 | 113 | 83 | 240 |
| Applied | 60 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 66 | 30 | 0 | 159 | |
| % Applied | 30% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 37% | 27% | 0% | 66% | |
| Taken | 60 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 66 | 30 | 0 | 159 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 37% | 27% | 0% | 66% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 123 | 123 | 79 | 160 | 116 | 40 | 240 |
| Applied | 77 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 44 | 76 | 0 | 203 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 28% | 66% | 0% | 85% | |
| Taken | 77 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 44 | 76 | 0 | 203 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 28% | 66% | 0% | 85% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 79 | 79 | 58 | 115 | 35 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 61 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 80 | 35 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 70% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Taken | 61 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 80 | 35 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 70% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 71 | 144 | 59 | 9 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 85 | 50 | 0 | 136 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 59% | 85% | 0% | 65% | |
| Taken | 66 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 85 | 50 | 0 | 203 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 59% | 85% | 0% | 97% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 70 | 141 | 77 | 58 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 64 | 19 | 0 | 84 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 45% | 25% | 0% | 40% | |
| Taken | 68 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 64 | 19 | 0 | 153 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 45% | 25% | 0% | 73% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 68 | 135 | 67 | 49 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 68 | 18 | 0 | 87 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 50% | 27% | 0% | 41% | |
| Taken | 67 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 68 | 18 | 0 | 161 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 1% | 3% | 0% | 50% | 27% | 0% | 77% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 68 | 136 | 25 | 2 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 112 | 23 | 0 | 136 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 82% | 92% | 0% | 65% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 111 | 23 | 0 | 209 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 82% | 92% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 88 | 174 | 80 | 37 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 95 | 43 | 0 | 140 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 55% | 54% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 64 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 94 | 43 | 0 | 203 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 54% | 54% | 0% | 85% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 91 | 181 | 86 | 37 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 37 | 0 | 134 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 54% | 43% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 57 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 97 | 49 | 0 | 205 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 54% | 57% | 0% | 85% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 97 | 190 | 31 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 160 | 38 | 0 | 201 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 84% | 123% | 0% | 84% | |
| Taken | 44 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 160 | 31 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 18% | 0% | 1% | 3% | 84% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 95 | 189 | 93 | 46 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96 | 36 | 0 | 132 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 51% | 39% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 19 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 96 | 47 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Taken | 9% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 51% | 51% | 0% | 78% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 104 | 208 | 134 | 40 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74 | 16 | 0 | 90 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 12% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 74 | 16 | 0 | 92 | |
| % Taken | 0% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 36% | 12% | 0% | 44% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Cantonment Primary School.
"It's okay.. Teachers not bad but not good, (love my music teacher though) classes sometimes boring, sometimes fun, but nowadays there's so many bullying/fighting incidents, and some students act like gangsters. I really don't get why they have to do that though, what's the point? Yeah, you can hurt them but they won't learn their lesson from that. And nobody wants to get in trouble. Overall, fine."
March 27, 2025
"Thank you for the amazing experience you gave me in my school years. I appreciate your efforts in teaching me even if I caused quite a bit of trouble. I heard that there is now a construction to a shelter over the basketball court. Good luck :)"
March 20, 2025
"This is an amazing school. My son is studying there. The teachers and principal, Mrs Mano are so patient and kind. Mrs Mano will stand at the gate and greet the kids most mornings and I saw her holding an umbrella sheltering the kids from rain. It is like a local international school. My son has friends from all over the world."
October 25, 2024
"amazing school but the toilets are dirty and the sinks are always full of stuff, no hate tho. im sure all toilets are like that. the canteens food is not the best. always raising the prices. imagine a bowl of ramen for 2.50 and it isn't even that nice. bring your own food."
January 19, 2025
"School Review The students at this school are absolutely amazimg, friendly, hardworking, and full of talent. They make the environment vibrant and enjoyable, creating a sense of camaraderie that's hard to find elsewhere. However, the teaching staff is a mixed bag. While some teachers are inspiring and dedicated, others can be dismissive, unapproachable, and downright unpleasant, which detracts from the overall learning experience.Another major drawback is the state of the toilets. It's almost impossible to step into them without being overwhelmed by the smell. Many toilets are often found with unflushed waste or dirty floors, which is both unhygienic and an embarrassment for a school of this caliber.In summary, the school has incredible students and great potential, but it seriously needs to address its teacher dynamics and sanitation issues."
December 12, 2024
"Cantonment Primary: Aight, Not Bad So, I went to this school, Cantonment Primary, and it was... okay, I guess. Like, it wasn't the worst, but it wasn't the best either. You know what I mean? The teachers were cool. Some were funny, some were strict, but they were all pretty chill. The classes were kinda boring sometimes, but there were a few fun projects and field trips. And the canteen food... let's just say I didn't starve, but it wasn't exactly a feast either. The school grounds were nice, though. Lots of trees and open spaces to run around. And the location was pretty convenient, so getting to and from school wasn't a hassle. Overall, Cantonment Primary was just... average. If you're looking for a good school, it's definitely worth checking out. But if you're expecting something amazing, you might be disappointed."
October 08, 2024