Cedar Primary School

15 CEDAR AVENUE , 349700

62885633

At a glance

Cedar Primary School in Singapore boasts a 100% application rate, reflecting its high local demand and competitiveness. Recognized for its exceptional academic achievements and holistic education, Cedar Primary continues to uphold its stellar reputation.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Potong Pasir MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Potong Pasir MRT Station
Principal

MR CHRIS CHUA

Vice Principals

MS CHOONG PEI CHIN, MR NG CHU SIU

Website

Http://www.cedarpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

cedar_ps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
30% 53% 75% 98% 120% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 40% 40% 109% 101%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
109%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 120%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 119 48 146 89 0
Applied 61 36 0 57 107 0
Taken 61 36 0 57 89 0
Taken Rate 34% 30% 0% 39% 120% -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
72%
Taken Rate
72%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 39%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 143 58 172 111 68
Applied 37 31 1 61 43 0
Taken 37 31 1 61 43 0
Taken Rate 21% 22% 2% 35% 39% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
69%
Taken Rate
69%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 34%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 128 51 151 113 75
Applied 52 36 1 38 38 0
Taken 52 36 1 38 38 0
Taken Rate 29% 28% 2% 25% 34% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
70%
Taken Rate
70%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 51%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 147 62 187 145 71
Applied 33 20 0 42 74 0
Taken 33 20 0 42 74 0
Taken Rate 18% 14% 0% 22% 51% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
70%
Taken Rate
70%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 40%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 164 164 97 193 121 73
Applied 36 0 10 1 72 48 0
Taken 36 0 10 1 72 48 0
Taken Rate 18% 0% 6% 1% 37% 40% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
57%
Taken Rate
57%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 28%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 145 145 88 175 134 103
Applied 55 0 9 1 41 31 0
Taken 55 0 9 1 41 31 0
Taken Rate 28% 0% 6% 1% 23% 23% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
40%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 21%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 134 135 83 166 135 128
Applied 36 0 9 0 31 7 0
Taken 36 0 9 0 31 7 0
Taken Rate 21% 0% 7% 0% 19% 5% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
43%
Taken Rate
74%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 44%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 61 122 84 47
Applied 0 0 0 1 39 37 0
Taken 45 0 13 0 38 37 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 32% 44% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
39%
Taken Rate
74%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 49%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 39 75 38 31
Applied 0 0 0 3 37 7 0
Taken 34 0 8 3 37 7 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 8% 49% 18% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
32%
Taken Rate
68%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 41%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 38 76 46 39
Applied 0 0 0 0 31 7 0
Taken 37 0 8 0 30 7 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 41% 15% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
56%
Taken Rate
96%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 75%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 36 72 20 5
Applied 0 0 0 0 52 15 0
Taken 35 1 12 0 52 15 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 72% 75% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
59%
Taken Rate
96%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 81%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 36 72 18 5
Applied 0 0 0 0 58 13 0
Taken 36 0 13 0 53 13 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 81% 72% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
53%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 102%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 32 62 120 120
Applied 0 0 0 1 63 0 0
Taken 40 0 17 1 62 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 102% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
64%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 125%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 38 74 4 120
Applied 0 0 0 1 71 5 0
Taken 33 0 12 1 70 4 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 96% 125% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
61%
Taken Rate
103%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 171%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 33 65 7 120
Applied 0 0 0 3 58 12 0
Taken 42 0 13 3 58 7 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 9% 89% 171% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
66%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 123%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 37 75 22 120
Applied 0 0 0 0 52 27 0
Taken 37 0 8 0 53 22 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 69% 123% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Cedar Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"Hey? I used to be in this school, Although the food were honestly mid, The teachers were great during my 6 years here. I learnt a lot of stuff. I never really enjoyed science in this school, But in secondary, FOR SOME REASON. I enjoy science and english."

Muhammad Riyan Ruwaidi Muhammad (Manjusriss)
Muhammad Riyan Ruwaidi Muhammad (Manjusriss)

April 11, 2025

"I am I student it is but it is the Western delight cos the Q is so long bro😭😭so who class is first is soo lucky!!!😭😭🥲"

Szeting Tan
Szeting Tan

February 08, 2025

"I was a student in this school before, and made some friends during that whole 6 years in that school. The teachers were awesome and I also liked that all of the students there were friendly. PSLE was hard but i managed to just pass. Now I'm in secondary."

Callmeryan
Callmeryan

January 25, 2025

"Hi, I'm from Class of 2024 and I had a great time in CPS. I'll remember Mr Zaki, a great Science teacher and the stories that he shared( If you're in his class, please watch his videos ;) ). I think they're gonna add another facility next year so watch out for that. They have wellness Wednesdays to help stretch and share gratitude. That's all i have. Hope you join our school :) !!"

Aliyah Mysha Mulyadi (Beattyss)
Aliyah Mysha Mulyadi (Beattyss)

November 25, 2024

"not all students are kind because I get bullied sometimes but I made good friends there and the teachers are super kind except one teacher that Litrelly did not let me see the dentist when my molar tooth was dropping also CCAs there are really fun and I had good teachers in my 6 years I will miss this school the school leaders are also very caring. -Alexander Class of 2024"

Alex Lin
Alex Lin

November 22, 2024

"graduated happily from this school and my teachers ( ms hong and mdm tan ) were amazing teachers and will definitely visit this school again. students here are definitely trouble makers in some classes but my class was on the good side:) food is pretty good and not too expensive"

Jess
Jess

November 21, 2024

Write A Review