Chij Katong Primary

17 MARTIA ROAD , 424821

63443072

At a glance

CHIJ Katong Primary, located in the charming heart of Katong, boasts a 100% application rate, reflecting its high demand and competitiveness. Known for its holistic education, the school nurtures talents across diverse fields, including sports, arts, and cutting-edge STEM programs.

School Type
Government-aided Sch
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
MARINE PARADE; EUNOS; PAYA LEBAR
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government-aided Sch Girls' School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: MARINE PARADE; EUNOS; PAYA LEBAR
Principal

MADAM MISCHA LEIGH PEREIRA

Vice Principals

MADAM TAN POH KUAN JOYCELYN, MISS SHARON NG YE CHIN

Website

http://chijkcp.moe.edu.sg/

Email

chijktps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
65% 80% 95% 110% 125% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 76% 76% 107% 100%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
107%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 139%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 87 40 107 36 0
Applied 53 28 12 71 50 0
Taken 53 28 12 71 36 0
Taken Rate 38% 32% 30% 66% 139% -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
73%
Taken Rate
73%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 41%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 106 44 114 67 54
Applied 34 35 17 47 13 0
Taken 34 35 17 47 13 0
Taken Rate 24% 33% 39% 41% 19% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
107%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 131%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 96 42 105 42 200
Applied 44 30 21 63 55 0
Taken 44 30 21 63 42 0
Taken Rate 31% 31% 50% 60% 131% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
99%
Taken Rate
99%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 97%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 101 43 112 59 2
Applied 39 33 16 53 57 0
Taken 39 33 16 53 57 0
Taken Rate 28% 33% 37% 47% 97% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
105%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 162%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 114 98 58 85 13 200
Applied 46 16 22 32 72 21 0
Taken 46 16 22 32 72 13 0
Taken Rate 29% 14% 22% 55% 85% 162% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
116%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 177%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 116 110 61 107 39 200
Applied 44 6 29 15 68 69 0
Taken 44 6 29 15 68 39 0
Taken Rate 28% 5% 26% 25% 64% 177% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
76%
Taken Rate
76%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 37%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 120 108 67 112 72 51
Applied 40 12 14 25 40 21 0
Taken 40 12 14 25 40 21 0
Taken Rate 25% 10% 13% 37% 36% 29% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
57%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 133%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 58 89 9 210
Applied 0 0 0 28 80 12 0
Taken 61 12 22 26 80 9 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 48% 90% 133% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
51%
Taken Rate
92%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 64%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 62 102 47 17
Applied 0 0 0 22 56 30 0
Taken 47 6 34 21 55 30 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 35% 55% 64% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
53%
Taken Rate
97%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 77%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 57 93 26 6
Applied 0 0 0 24 67 20 0
Taken 60 12 25 20 67 20 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 42% 72% 77% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
55%
Taken Rate
94%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 66%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 72 110 37 14
Applied 0 0 0 35 73 23 0
Taken 65 10 22 33 73 23 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 49% 66% 62% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
67%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 97%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 80 120 35 1
Applied 0 0 0 39 87 34 0
Taken 50 3 28 39 85 34 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 49% 73% 97% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
57%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 104%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 66 91 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 41 95 0 0
Taken 60 2 46 41 91 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 62% 104% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
60%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 102%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 72 104 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 39 106 0 0
Taken 50 4 43 39 104 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 54% 102% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
66%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 105%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 77 98 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 55 103 0 0
Taken 46 4 37 55 98 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 71% 105% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
68%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 112%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 76 89 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 62 100 0 0
Taken 47 5 37 62 89 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 82% 112% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Chij Katong Primary, or share your own experience below.

"graduated a few years ago, overall the curiculum wasn't too bad. the school gave us many opportunities for learning journeys and emphasized catholicism however the environment was kind of toxic. the girls were talking shit about each other and its normal for girls schools, but this was at another level and some teachers were a bit biased"

ashley
ashley

March 23, 2025

"Just graduated this year💗 Overall the school is above average, sure got some ‘karen’ chers here and there, but in general all the teachers r vv passionate about their job. The canteen is uh questionably dirty though😭😭 Youll meet a mix of good and bad students here, u js need to know who to befriend💗🙏"

Lee Yuanxin
Lee Yuanxin

November 24, 2024

"I had a very good 5 years in KCP . The teachers taught me well , and I always enjoyed coming to school even though I had to wake up at 5 am in the morning ."

Chong Ci Lin (Chijktps)
Chong Ci Lin (Chijktps)

October 26, 2024

"graduated from kcp a few years ago and i have to say that i miss this school so much. the most of the teachers were really nice and go the extra mile to make sure that the students understand what was taught. my most favourite teacher is mrs soloman, she taught english and science and always put in so much effort into her lessons and was so encouraging! the students during my time were mostly very friendly and approachable as well. i miss the canteen food a lot too, the venders are super nice! thank you kcp for the experience ❤️"

Ashley Tan Shi Xuan (Tmjc)
Ashley Tan Shi Xuan (Tmjc)

April 01, 2024

"Beautiful school! Welcome to be a Parent Volunteer"

Blackraven
Blackraven

May 26, 2022

Write A Review