CHIJ Katong Primary, located in the charming heart of Katong, boasts a 100% application rate, reflecting its high demand and competitiveness. Known for its holistic education, the school nurtures talents across diverse fields, including sports, arts, and cutting-edge STEM programs.
Noteworthy achievements include consistently high performances in national examinations and a recent spotlight in the news for its environmental initiatives. CHIJ Katong offers a vibrant learning environment that cultivates character and academic excellence, making it a top choice for parents seeking Primary 1 admission.
Be prepared, though; its popularity may mean a highly competitive application process.
Chij Katong Primary
Principal:
Mdm Mischa Leigh Pereira
Vice Principals:
Mrs Tan Poh Kuan Joycelyn , Mdm Sharon Ng Ye Chin
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
EUNOS PAYA LEBAR
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 140 | 87 | 40 | 107 | 36 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 53 | 28 | 12 | 71 | 50 | 0 | 214 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 32% | 30% | 66% | 139% | - | - | |
| Taken | 53 | 28 | 12 | 71 | 36 | 0 | 200 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 32% | 30% | 66% | 100% | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 140 | 106 | 44 | 114 | 67 | 54 | 200 |
| Applied | 34 | 35 | 17 | 47 | 13 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Applied | 24% | 33% | 39% | 41% | 19% | 0% | 73% | |
| Taken | 34 | 35 | 17 | 47 | 13 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 33% | 39% | 41% | 19% | 0% | 73% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 140 | 96 | 42 | 105 | 42 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 44 | 30 | 21 | 63 | 55 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Applied | 31% | 31% | 50% | 60% | 131% | 0% | 107% | |
| Taken | 44 | 30 | 21 | 63 | 42 | 0 | 200 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 31% | 50% | 60% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 140 | 101 | 43 | 112 | 59 | 2 | 200 |
| Applied | 39 | 33 | 16 | 53 | 57 | 0 | 198 | |
| % Applied | 28% | 33% | 37% | 47% | 97% | 0% | 99% | |
| Taken | 39 | 33 | 16 | 53 | 57 | 0 | 198 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 33% | 37% | 47% | 97% | 0% | 99% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 160 | 114 | 98 | 58 | 85 | 13 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 46 | 16 | 22 | 32 | 72 | 21 | 0 | 209 | |
| % Applied | 29% | 14% | 22% | 55% | 85% | 162% | 0% | 105% | |
| Taken | 46 | 16 | 22 | 32 | 72 | 13 | 0 | 201 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 14% | 22% | 55% | 85% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 160 | 116 | 110 | 61 | 107 | 39 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 44 | 6 | 29 | 15 | 68 | 69 | 0 | 231 | |
| % Applied | 28% | 5% | 26% | 25% | 64% | 177% | 0% | 116% | |
| Taken | 44 | 6 | 29 | 15 | 68 | 39 | 0 | 201 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 5% | 26% | 25% | 64% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 160 | 120 | 108 | 67 | 112 | 72 | 51 | 200 |
| Applied | 40 | 12 | 14 | 25 | 40 | 21 | 0 | 152 | |
| % Applied | 25% | 10% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 29% | 0% | 76% | |
| Taken | 40 | 12 | 14 | 25 | 40 | 21 | 0 | 152 | |
| % Taken | 25% | 10% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 29% | 0% | 76% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 58 | 89 | 9 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 80 | 12 | 0 | 120 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 48% | 90% | 133% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 61 | 12 | 22 | 26 | 80 | 9 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 6% | 10% | 45% | 90% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 62 | 102 | 47 | 17 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 56 | 30 | 0 | 108 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 35% | 55% | 64% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 47 | 6 | 34 | 21 | 55 | 30 | 0 | 193 | |
| % Taken | 22% | 3% | 16% | 34% | 54% | 64% | 0% | 92% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 57 | 93 | 26 | 6 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 67 | 20 | 0 | 111 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 42% | 72% | 77% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 60 | 12 | 25 | 20 | 67 | 20 | 0 | 204 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 6% | 12% | 35% | 72% | 77% | 0% | 97% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 72 | 110 | 37 | 14 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 73 | 23 | 0 | 131 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 49% | 66% | 62% | 0% | 55% | |
| Taken | 65 | 10 | 22 | 33 | 73 | 23 | 0 | 226 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 4% | 9% | 46% | 66% | 62% | 0% | 94% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 80 | 120 | 35 | 1 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 87 | 34 | 0 | 160 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 49% | 73% | 97% | 0% | 67% | |
| Taken | 50 | 3 | 28 | 39 | 85 | 34 | 0 | 239 | |
| % Taken | 21% | 1% | 12% | 49% | 71% | 97% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 66 | 91 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 136 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 62% | 104% | 0% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 60 | 2 | 46 | 41 | 91 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 25% | 1% | 19% | 62% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 72 | 104 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 106 | 0 | 0 | 145 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 54% | 102% | 0% | 0% | 60% | |
| Taken | 50 | 4 | 43 | 39 | 104 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 21% | 2% | 18% | 54% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 77 | 98 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 103 | 0 | 0 | 158 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 71% | 105% | 0% | 0% | 66% | |
| Taken | 46 | 4 | 37 | 55 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 19% | 2% | 15% | 71% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 76 | 89 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 162 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 82% | 112% | 0% | 0% | 68% | |
| Taken | 47 | 5 | 37 | 62 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 20% | 2% | 15% | 82% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Chij Katong Primary.
"graduated a few years ago, overall the curiculum wasn't too bad. the school gave us many opportunities for learning journeys and emphasized catholicism however the environment was kind of toxic. the girls were talking shit about each other and its normal for girls schools, but this was at another level and some teachers were a bit biased"
March 23, 2025
"Just graduated this year💗 Overall the school is above average, sure got some ‘karen’ chers here and there, but in general all the teachers r vv passionate about their job. The canteen is uh questionably dirty though😭😭 Youll meet a mix of good and bad students here, u js need to know who to befriend💗🙏"
November 24, 2024
"I had a very good 5 years in KCP . The teachers taught me well , and I always enjoyed coming to school even though I had to wake up at 5 am in the morning ."
October 26, 2024
"graduated from kcp a few years ago and i have to say that i miss this school so much. the most of the teachers were really nice and go the extra mile to make sure that the students understand what was taught. my most favourite teacher is mrs soloman, she taught english and science and always put in so much effort into her lessons and was so encouraging! the students during my time were mostly very friendly and approachable as well. i miss the canteen food a lot too, the venders are super nice! thank you kcp for the experience ❤️"
April 01, 2024
"Beautiful school! Welcome to be a Parent Volunteer"
May 26, 2022