CHIJ Primary (Toa Payoh) is a popular choice among Singaporean parents, with a competitive application rate of 131% from 277 applications for 211 placements. This all-girls primary school has a rich history and a strong reputation for academic brilliance.
Known for its nurturing environment, the school also excels in co-curricular programs such as sports, arts, and STEM. With recent news highlighting the school's achievements in the Singapore Science and Engineering Fair, CHIJ Primary (Toa Payoh) continues to make strides in nurturing well-rounded individuals.
Located in the heart of Toa Payoh, this school is easily accessible and highly sought-after.
Chij Primary Toa Payoh
Principal:
Mdm Chua Sook Lian Judina
Vice Principals:
Mdm Sng Charmaine, Mdm Lau Sok Ling Melissa
Session Type:
Single Session
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Toa Payoh
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Vacancy | 150 | 86 | 20 | 41 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 64 | 88 | 42 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 277 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 102% | 210% | 202% | 0% | 0% | 132% | |
| Taken | 64 | 86 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 100 | 27 | 55 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 51 | 78 | 53 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 251 | |
| % Applied | 34% | 78% | 196% | 125% | 0% | 0% | 120% | |
| Taken | 51 | 78 | 27 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 78% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 150 | 95 | 27 | 54 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 55 | 74 | 40 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 237 | |
| % Applied | 37% | 78% | 148% | 126% | 0% | 0% | 113% | |
| Taken | 55 | 74 | 27 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 78% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 170 | 119 | 67 | 42 | 44 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 51 | 52 | 24 | 59 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 243 | |
| % Applied | 30% | 44% | 36% | 140% | 130% | 0% | 0% | 116% | |
| Taken | 51 | 52 | 24 | 42 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 44% | 36% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 170 | 106 | 52 | 35 | 35 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 64 | 54 | 23 | 63 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 253 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 51% | 44% | 180% | 140% | 0% | 0% | 120% | |
| Taken | 64 | 54 | 23 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 51% | 44% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 116 | 67 | 42 | 43 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 54 | 49 | 24 | 68 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 258 | |
| % Applied | 32% | 42% | 36% | 162% | 147% | 0% | 0% | 123% | |
| Taken | 54 | 49 | 24 | 42 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 212 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 42% | 36% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 47 | 49 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 133 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 147% | 131% | 0% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 57 | 42 | 17 | 45 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 20% | 8% | 96% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 39 | 38 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 114 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 146% | 150% | 0% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 58 | 52 | 23 | 39 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 25% | 11% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 46 | 53 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 130 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 139% | 125% | 0% | 0% | 62% | |
| Taken | 57 | 38 | 24 | 38 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 18% | 11% | 83% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 45 | 47 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 111 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 120% | 121% | 0% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 58 | 33 | 29 | 43 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 16% | 14% | 96% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 50 | 51 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 138 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 128% | 145% | 0% | 0% | 66% | |
| Taken | 53 | 36 | 21 | 49 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 25% | 17% | 10% | 98% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 45 | 44 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 114 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 133% | 123% | 0% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 70 | 25 | 26 | 45 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 12% | 12% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 50 | 50 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 126 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 136% | 116% | 0% | 0% | 60% | |
| Taken | 56 | 22 | 32 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 10% | 15% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 48 | 50 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 123 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 131% | 120% | 0% | 0% | 59% | |
| Taken | 57 | 28 | 29 | 48 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 212 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 13% | 14% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 53 | 52 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 140 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 134% | 133% | 0% | 0% | 67% | |
| Taken | 49 | 21 | 35 | 53 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 23% | 10% | 17% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Chij Primary Toa Payoh.
"I am studying here now and I love it! Our teachers are strict (in a good way) yet kind caring and forgiving!"
July 14, 2019
"Compact but focus driven school with is embedded within a neighborhood."
September 22, 2023
"So blessed to have gone to this school. Miss the old school buildings and ponds, but the new one looks fabulous."
June 18, 2018
"im in my last year in IJ here and i enjoy this school and most of the teachers are nice here :)"
August 18, 2019
"Well i was in this school for 6 years and i enjoyed it and deeply missed the teachers."
April 24, 2019