Corporation Primary School, located in the heart of Singapore, is a highly sought-after school with a 100% application rate, based on 126 applications and placements. Known for its exceptional holistic education, the school's curriculum is enriched by a variety of programs, including arts, sports, and a special emphasis on STEM education.
Recently, Corporation Primary School has been in the news for its students' remarkable achievements in national competitions, further establishing its status as a competitive choice for Primary 1 admissions. Secure your child's spot in this renowned institution and set them on the path of excellence.
Corporation Primary School
Principal:
Mr Muhammad Fadylla B Rashiman
Vice Principals:
Mdm Josephine Ng Seow Wei, Mdm Goh Mui Ee
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
BOON LAY STATION LAKESIDE STATION
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 120 | 60 | 36 | 109 | 86 | 68 | 68 |
| Applied | 60 | 11 | 0 | 23 | 18 | 0 | 112 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 18% | 0% | 21% | 21% | 0% | 165% | |
| Taken | 60 | 11 | 0 | 23 | 18 | 0 | 112 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 18% | 0% | 21% | 21% | 0% | 165% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 120 | 54 | 35 | 105 | 81 | 54 | 180 |
| Applied | 66 | 9 | 0 | 24 | 27 | 0 | 126 | |
| % Applied | 55% | 17% | 0% | 23% | 33% | 0% | 70% | |
| Taken | 66 | 9 | 0 | 24 | 27 | 0 | 126 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 17% | 0% | 23% | 33% | 0% | 70% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 120 | 75 | 39 | 118 | 88 | 70 | 180 |
| Applied | 45 | 17 | 2 | 31 | 18 | 0 | 113 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 23% | 5% | 26% | 20% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 45 | 17 | 2 | 31 | 18 | 0 | 113 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 23% | 5% | 26% | 20% | 0% | 63% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 98 | 51 | 151 | 97 | 66 | 240 |
| Applied | 82 | 6 | 1 | 54 | 31 | 0 | 174 | |
| % Applied | 46% | 6% | 2% | 36% | 32% | 0% | 73% | |
| Taken | 82 | 6 | 1 | 54 | 31 | 0 | 174 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 6% | 2% | 36% | 32% | 0% | 73% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 230 | 158 | 157 | 93 | 187 | 148 | 107 | 270 |
| Applied | 72 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 39 | 41 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Applied | 31% | 1% | 7% | 0% | 21% | 28% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 72 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 39 | 41 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 1% | 7% | 0% | 21% | 28% | 0% | 61% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 117 | 117 | 73 | 146 | 89 | 24 | 240 |
| Applied | 83 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 57 | 65 | 0 | 216 | |
| % Applied | 42% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 39% | 73% | 0% | 90% | |
| Taken | 83 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 57 | 65 | 0 | 216 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 39% | 73% | 0% | 90% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 95 | 95 | 64 | 127 | 69 | 8 | 210 |
| Applied | 75 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 58 | 61 | 0 | 202 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 46% | 88% | 0% | 96% | |
| Taken | 75 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 58 | 61 | 0 | 202 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 46% | 88% | 0% | 96% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 79 | 158 | 69 | 16 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89 | 53 | 0 | 142 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 56% | 77% | 0% | 59% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 89 | 53 | 0 | 224 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 56% | 77% | 0% | 93% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 66 | 131 | 64 | 17 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 67 | 47 | 0 | 115 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 51% | 73% | 0% | 55% | |
| Taken | 72 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 67 | 47 | 0 | 193 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 51% | 73% | 0% | 92% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 61 | 122 | 57 | 35 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 22 | 0 | 87 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 53% | 39% | 0% | 41% | |
| Taken | 78 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 65 | 22 | 0 | 176 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 53% | 39% | 0% | 84% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 56 | 113 | 24 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89 | 27 | 0 | 116 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 79% | 113% | 0% | 55% | |
| Taken | 92 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 89 | 24 | 0 | 212 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 79% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 70 | 139 | 45 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 61 | 0 | 156 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 68% | 136% | 0% | 74% | |
| Taken | 66 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 94 | 45 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 68% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 58 | 115 | 54 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 62 | 46 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 54% | 85% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 92 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 62 | 54 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 1% | 2% | 54% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 66 | 132 | 52 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 47 | 0 | 127 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 61% | 90% | 0% | 60% | |
| Taken | 74 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 81 | 52 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 61% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 86 | 151 | 67 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 84 | 56 | 0 | 166 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 30% | 56% | 84% | 0% | 69% | |
| Taken | 34 | 27 | 7 | 23 | 84 | 67 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 14% | 11% | 3% | 27% | 56% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 106 | 209 | 139 | 46 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 78 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 33% | 56% | 0% | 50% | |
| Taken | 66 | 9 | 14 | 2 | 70 | 78 | 0 | 239 | |
| % Taken | 22% | 3% | 5% | 2% | 33% | 56% | 0% | 80% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Corporation Primary School.
"This is the last year of CPS for my child. My first impression from P1 was of Mr. Goh, who was very helpful. Even now in P6, we still remember him fondly. He created a wonderful time capsule for the students, capturing memories from P1 to P6, which is truly amazing! He has put in a lot of effort for the students, and he truly deserves praise. The CPS environment is clean, and the staff are helpful. Thank you!"
November 22, 2024
"mid sch tbh.. the students are quite nice there. But the school is sooo strict😭. My sch now is kinda bro. And Mr Ong has anger issues he’s not disciplining anybody… but the other teachers there are okayy! Wouldn’t really recommend going here but if it’s really near ur house then go ahead I guess😎"
January 10, 2025
"overall, school got renovated right after i graduated last year. Still though, the discipline master often shout in front of students faces, some started crying due to this, some of my friends too started to hate the discipline master. The teachers are great, if you dont understand you can always ask them ( before i graduated thats what i know) and they will help you with the topic."
November 04, 2024
"my math teacher always targets me for no reason and for NAPFA they make us stay back till 5pm+ when they could've done it during PE classes or for the whole day."
February 17, 2025
"I was walking around my playground when i saw the corporation pirmary school name writen on a slide.Tell your students to stop vandalising"
March 30, 2025