Corporation Primary School

31 JURONG WEST STREET 24 , 648347

67957381

At a glance

Corporation Primary School, located in the heart of Singapore, is a highly sought-after school with a 100% application rate, based on 126 applications and placements. Known for its exceptional holistic education, the school's curriculum is enriched by a variety of programs, including arts, sports, and a special emphasis on STEM education.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
BOON LAY STATION; LAKESIDE STATION
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: BOON LAY STATION; LAKESIDE STATION
Principal

MR MUHAMMAD FADYLLA B RASHIMAN

Vice Principals

MDM GOH MUI EE, MADAM NG SEOW WEI JOSEPHINE

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
55% 68% 80% 93% 105% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 96% 96% 62% 62%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
62%
Taken Rate
62%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 50%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 60 36 109 86 68
Applied 60 11 0 23 18 0
Taken 60 11 0 23 18 0
Taken Rate 50% 18% 0% 21% 21% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
70%
Taken Rate
70%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 55%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 54 35 105 81 54
Applied 66 9 0 24 27 0
Taken 66 9 0 24 27 0
Taken Rate 55% 17% 0% 23% 33% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
63%
Taken Rate
63%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 38%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 75 39 118 88 70
Applied 45 17 2 31 18 0
Taken 45 17 2 31 18 0
Taken Rate 38% 23% 5% 26% 20% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
73%
Taken Rate
73%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 46%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 98 51 151 97 66
Applied 82 6 1 54 31 0
Taken 82 6 1 54 31 0
Taken Rate 46% 6% 2% 36% 32% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
61%
Taken Rate
61%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 31%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 230 158 157 93 187 148 107
Applied 72 1 11 0 39 41 0
Taken 72 1 11 0 39 41 0
Taken Rate 31% 1% 7% 0% 21% 28% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
90%
Taken Rate
90%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 73%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 117 117 73 146 89 24
Applied 83 0 11 0 57 65 0
Taken 83 0 11 0 57 65 0
Taken Rate 42% 0% 9% 0% 39% 73% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
96%
Taken Rate
96%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 88%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 95 95 64 127 69 8
Applied 75 0 8 0 58 61 0
Taken 75 0 8 0 58 61 0
Taken Rate 44% 0% 8% 0% 46% 88% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
59%
Taken Rate
93%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 77%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 79 158 69 16
Applied 0 0 0 0 89 53 0
Taken 72 0 10 0 89 53 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 56% 77% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
55%
Taken Rate
92%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 73%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 66 131 64 17
Applied 0 0 0 1 67 47 0
Taken 72 1 6 0 67 47 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 51% 73% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
84%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 53%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 61 122 57 35
Applied 0 0 0 0 65 22 0
Taken 78 0 11 0 65 22 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 53% 39% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
55%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 113%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 56 113 24 210
Applied 0 0 0 0 89 27 0
Taken 92 0 7 0 89 24 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 79% 113% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
74%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 136%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 70 139 45 210
Applied 0 0 0 0 95 61 0
Taken 66 0 5 0 94 45 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 68% 136% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 85%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 58 115 54 210
Applied 0 0 0 1 62 46 0
Taken 92 0 2 1 62 54 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 54% 85% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
60%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 90%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 66 132 52 210
Applied 0 0 0 0 80 47 0
Taken 74 0 4 0 81 52 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 61% 90% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
69%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 84%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 86 151 67 240
Applied 0 0 0 26 84 56 0
Taken 34 27 7 23 84 67 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 30% 56% 84% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
300
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
80%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 56%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 300 300 300 106 209 139 46
Applied 0 0 0 2 70 78 0
Taken 66 9 14 2 70 78 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 33% 56% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Corporation Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"I was walking around my playground when i saw the corporation pirmary school name writen on a slide.Tell your students to stop vandalising"

Fraser

March 30, 2025

"my math teacher always targets me for no reason and for NAPFA they make us stay back till 5pm+ when they could've done it during PE classes or for the whole day."

Kelly KellyLow

February 17, 2025

"mid sch tbh.. the students are quite nice there. But the school is sooo strict😭. My sch now is kinda bro. And Mr Ong has anger issues he’s not disciplining anybody… but the other teachers there are okayy! Wouldn’t really recommend going here but if it’s really near ur house then go ahead I guess😎"

skibidi toilet

January 10, 2025

"This is the last year of CPS for my child. My first impression from P1 was of Mr. Goh, who was very helpful. Even now in P6, we still remember him fondly. He created a wonderful time capsule for the students, capturing memories from P1 to P6, which is truly amazing! He has put in a lot of effort for the students, and he truly deserves praise. The CPS environment is clean, and the staff are helpful. Thank you!"

T Victor

November 22, 2024

"overall, school got renovated right after i graduated last year. Still though, the discipline master often shout in front of students faces, some started crying due to this, some of my friends too started to hate the discipline master. The teachers are great, if you dont understand you can always ask them ( before i graduated thats what i know) and they will help you with the topic."

That Random IceBear

November 04, 2024

Write A Review