With an application rate of 118%, Dazhong Primary School is a highly sought-after school in Singapore, reflecting its reputation for academic excellence. Located in Bukit Batok, Dazhong Primary School has a proud history of high student performance and is known for its vibrant arts and sports programs.
Notably, the school was recently acclaimed for its innovative approach to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. The high demand for placements at Dazhong Primary School underscores its exceptional quality and competitiveness in Singapore's education landscape.
Singaporean parents seeking a holistic and rigorous Primary 1 education for their children should consider Dazhong Primary School.
Dazhong Primary School
Principal:
Mr Chris Loh Kai Mun
Vice Principals:
Mrs Boey - Lim Seow Khim, Mr Koh Kah Hock
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Bukit Gombak
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 140 | 68 | 26 | 80 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 72 | 49 | 0 | 72 | 21 | 0 | 214 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 72% | 0% | 90% | 233% | - | - | |
| Taken | 72 | 49 | 0 | 72 | 9 | 0 | 202 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 72% | 0% | 90% | 100% | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 140 | 61 | 20 | 60 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 79 | 62 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 235 | |
| % Applied | 56% | 102% | 0% | 157% | 0% | 0% | 118% | |
| Taken | 79 | 61 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 200 | |
| % Taken | 56% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 140 | 84 | 28 | 85 | 2 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 56 | 61 | 0 | 83 | 41 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Applied | 40% | 73% | 0% | 98% | 2,050% | 0% | 121% | |
| Taken | 56 | 61 | 0 | 83 | 2 | 0 | 202 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 73% | 0% | 98% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 140 | 51 | 24 | 73 | 7 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 89 | 40 | 0 | 66 | 65 | 0 | 260 | |
| % Applied | 64% | 78% | 0% | 90% | 929% | 0% | 130% | |
| Taken | 89 | 40 | 0 | 66 | 7 | 0 | 202 | |
| % Taken | 64% | 78% | 0% | 90% | 100% | 0% | 101% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 160 | 89 | 89 | 45 | 88 | 16 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 71 | 0 | 40 | 1 | 72 | 69 | 0 | 253 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 0% | 45% | 2% | 82% | 431% | 0% | 127% | |
| Taken | 71 | 0 | 40 | 1 | 72 | 16 | 0 | 200 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 45% | 2% | 82% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 160 | 100 | 100 | 52 | 104 | 62 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 60 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 43 | 135 | 0 | 274 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 0% | 36% | 0% | 41% | 218% | 0% | 137% | |
| Taken | 60 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 43 | 62 | 0 | 201 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 36% | 0% | 41% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 85 | 83 | 50 | 101 | 66 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 55 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 36 | 67 | 0 | 183 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 2% | 28% | 0% | 36% | 102% | 0% | 102% | |
| Taken | 55 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 36 | 66 | 0 | 182 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 2% | 28% | 0% | 36% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 77 | 153 | 115 | 58 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 57 | 0 | 96 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 50% | 0% | 46% | |
| Taken | 46 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 38 | 57 | 0 | 152 | |
| % Taken | 22% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 25% | 50% | 0% | 72% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 150 | 150 | 150 | 39 | 77 | 42 | 19 | 150 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 23 | 0 | 58 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 55% | 0% | 39% | |
| Taken | 61 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 35 | 23 | 0 | 131 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 45% | 55% | 0% | 87% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 150 | 150 | 150 | 46 | 92 | 43 | 37 | 150 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 6 | 0 | 56 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 54% | 14% | 0% | 37% | |
| Taken | 48 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 49 | 6 | 0 | 113 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 53% | 14% | 0% | 75% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 64 | 130 | 71 | 59 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 12 | 0 | 71 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 17% | 0% | 39% | |
| Taken | 40 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 59 | 12 | 0 | 123 | |
| % Taken | 22% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 45% | 17% | 0% | 68% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 64 | 128 | 63 | 46 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 17 | 0 | 82 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 51% | 27% | 0% | 46% | |
| Taken | 34 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 65 | 17 | 0 | 134 | |
| % Taken | 19% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 51% | 27% | 0% | 74% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 62 | 124 | 43 | 26 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81 | 14 | 0 | 95 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 65% | 33% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 46 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 81 | 17 | 0 | 154 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 65% | 40% | 0% | 86% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 65 | 128 | 55 | 45 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 10 | 0 | 86 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 58% | 18% | 0% | 48% | |
| Taken | 33 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 74 | 10 | 0 | 136 | |
| % Taken | 18% | 0% | 9% | 3% | 58% | 18% | 0% | 76% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 64 | 128 | 99 | 35 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 21 | 0 | 51 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 23% | 21% | 0% | 28% | |
| Taken | 42 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 29 | 64 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Taken | 23% | 1% | 5% | 2% | 23% | 65% | 0% | 81% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 150 | 150 | 150 | 62 | 122 | 110 | 23 | 150 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 25 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 10% | 11% | 0% | 17% | |
| Taken | 21 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 52 | |
| % Taken | 14% | 1% | 3% | 2% | 10% | 11% | 0% | 35% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Dazhong Primary School.
"The environment is very good, the teachers are very responsible, and the children like Dazhong Primary School and the teachers very much."
September 17, 2024
"My children have been studying at DZPS. The school leaders are very enthusiastic, and teachers cater to individual students' various needs. Children are given many opportunities to improve their leadership, academic, and social skills. I am very satisfied with the school."
December 14, 2022
"I like my school. I wish I had been more active and joined more social activities organized by my school to meet more friends. I also wish I had attended more after school language classes to improve my English."
April 26, 2023
"Excellent and modern facilities, caring and warm principal and staff and my two kids are very happy there and always look forward to school. There are many innovative programmes which engage and enrich the school children. Definitely the best school in the whole constituency. If only more heartland primary schools are like Dazhong."
October 14, 2016
"My school is very interested and cool because it feels like my safe place to learn"
November 13, 2023
"A good school with many fun activities and caring teachers. I had been studying there for 5 years. It was fun. Recommended."
November 29, 2020