Dazhong Primary School

35 BUKIT BATOK STREET 31 , 659441

65658002

At a glance

DAZHONG Primary School, a government co-ed institution, is a choice destination for parents seeking a well-rounded education for their children. With a steady academic profile, the school offers a broad-based primary education that caters to the diverse interests and strengths of its students.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Bukit Gombak
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Bukit Gombak
Estimated demand near this school: High
High

Directional estimate grouped by latest MOE ballot pressure, recent applied-rate trend, local child-population proxy, and nearby vacancies.

Demand signals snapshot
Show details Hide details
SingStat is an area population proxy, not the number of children registering for this school. The one-year cohort estimate divides the age 5 to 9 count by 5.
Latest MOE ballot signal
Year
2025
Segment
- -
Phases balloted
2C(S)
Latest applied rate
233%
Local child pool
SingStat age 5 to 9
930
Estimated 1-year cohort
186
Area
Hong Kah North (subzone)
Area share
3.6%
Nearby capacity
Nearby vacancies (2km)
1,720
Capacity context
About 9.2 vacancies per estimated local child
MOE balloted - - in 2025 in phases 2C(S).
Principal

MR CHRIS LOH KAI MUN

Vice Principals

MR KOH KAH HOCK, MRS LIM SEOW KHIM MRS BOEY- LIM SEOW KHIM

Website

http://www.dazhongpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

dazhong_ps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 102% 101% 107% 101% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 102% 101% 107% 101%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. When MOE marks a phase for balloting, the school was oversubscribed for that phase.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
107%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Balloting
Yes
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S)
Vacancies 140 68 26 80 9
Applied 72 49 0 72 21
Taken 72 49 0 72 9
Taken Rate 51% 72% 0% 90% 233%
Balloting - - - - Yes
Vacancies for ballot - - - - 0
Balloting applicants - - - - 0
Balloted group - - - - -
MOE balloting notes

MOE ballots only when applicants exceed remaining vacancies. The table above shows the phase counts and whether SC or PR had to ballot for each phase.

Highest demand: 2C(S) at 233%
Show details Hide details
2C(S)
Balloted group (SC/PR)

MOE did not publish a priority group for this phase.

2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
118%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 61 20 60 200 200
Applied 79 62 0 94 0 0
Taken 79 61 0 60 0 0
Taken Rate 56% 102% 0% 157% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
121%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 84 28 85 2 200
Applied 56 61 0 83 41 0
Taken 56 61 0 83 2 0
Taken Rate 40% 73% 0% 98% 2050% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
130%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 51 24 73 7 200
Applied 89 40 0 66 65 0
Taken 89 40 0 66 7 0
Taken Rate 64% 78% 0% 90% 929% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. When MOE marks a phase for balloting, the school was oversubscribed for that phase.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
127%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 89 89 45 88 16 200
Applied 71 0 40 1 72 69 0
Taken 71 0 40 1 72 16 0
Taken Rate 44% 0% 45% 2% 82% 431% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
137%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 100 100 52 104 62 200
Applied 60 0 36 0 43 135 0
Taken 60 0 36 0 43 62 0
Taken Rate 38% 0% 36% 0% 41% 218% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
102%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 85 83 50 101 66 180
Applied 55 2 23 0 36 67 0
Taken 55 2 23 0 36 66 0
Taken Rate 39% 2% 28% 0% 36% 102% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
46%
Taken Rate
72%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 77 153 115 58
Applied 0 0 0 0 39 57 0
Taken 46 0 11 0 38 57 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 50% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
39%
Taken Rate
87%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 39 77 42 19
Applied 0 0 0 0 35 23 0
Taken 61 0 12 0 35 23 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 45% 55% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
37%
Taken Rate
75%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 46 92 43 37
Applied 0 0 0 0 50 6 0
Taken 48 0 10 0 49 6 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 54% 14% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
39%
Taken Rate
68%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 64 130 71 59
Applied 0 0 0 0 59 12 0
Taken 40 0 12 0 59 12 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 45% 17% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
46%
Taken Rate
74%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 64 128 63 46
Applied 0 0 0 0 65 17 0
Taken 34 0 18 0 65 17 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 51% 27% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
53%
Taken Rate
86%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 62 124 43 26
Applied 0 0 0 0 81 14 0
Taken 46 0 10 0 81 17 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 65% 33% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
48%
Taken Rate
76%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 65 128 55 45
Applied 0 0 0 2 74 10 0
Taken 33 0 17 2 74 10 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 58% 18% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
28%
Taken Rate
81%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 64 128 99 35
Applied 0 0 0 1 29 21 0
Taken 42 1 9 1 29 64 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 23% 21% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
17%
Taken Rate
35%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 62 122 110 23
Applied 0 0 0 1 12 12 0
Taken 21 1 5 1 12 12 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 10% 11% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Dazhong Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"The environment is very good, the teachers are very responsible, and the children like Dazhong Primary School and the teachers very much."

shermei huang
shermei huang

September 17, 2024

"My school is very interested and cool because it feels like my safe place to learn"

Nur Adrianawsdbmrwqp
Nur Adrianawsdbmrwqp

November 13, 2023

"I like my school. I wish I had been more active and joined more social activities organized by my school to meet more friends. I also wish I had attended more after school language classes to improve my English."

Orion Moonwalker
Orion Moonwalker

April 26, 2023

"My children have been studying at DZPS. The school leaders are very enthusiastic, and teachers cater to individual students' various needs. Children are given many opportunities to improve their leadership, academic, and social skills. I am very satisfied with the school."

Hari J
Hari J

December 14, 2022

"A good school with many fun activities and caring teachers. I had been studying there for 5 years. It was fun. Recommended."

Ong May
Ong May

November 29, 2020

"Excellent and modern facilities, caring and warm principal and staff and my two kids are very happy there and always look forward to school. There are many innovative programmes which engage and enrich the school children. Definitely the best school in the whole constituency. If only more heartland primary schools are like Dazhong."

Kim Teck tan
Kim Teck tan

October 14, 2016

Write A Review