Edgefield Primary School, nestled in the heart of Punggol, is a popular choice among Singaporean parents, boasting a 100% application rate. Known for its holistic approach to education, the school is recognised for its achievements in sports and arts.
Recently, Edgefield made headlines for clinching the National Primary Schools Track and Field Championships. This vibrant school also offers a robust STEM program, encouraging young learners to embrace the technologies of the future.
Edgefield Primary School's strong demand underscores its competitive nature, making it an appealing choice for families seeking an enriching and balanced education.
Edgefield Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Rabiathul Bazriya d/o Abubakar
Vice Principals:
Mdm Tan Pey San, Mr Yap Lih Min
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Punggol MRT
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 180 | 122 | 59 | 178 | 152 | 113 | 113 |
| Applied | 58 | 5 | 0 | 26 | 39 | 0 | 128 | |
| % Applied | 32% | 4% | 0% | 15% | 26% | 0% | 113% | |
| Taken | 58 | 5 | 0 | 26 | 39 | 0 | 128 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 4% | 0% | 15% | 26% | 0% | 113% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 180 | 111 | 54 | 162 | 131 | 98 | 240 |
| Applied | 69 | 9 | 0 | 31 | 33 | 0 | 142 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 8% | 0% | 19% | 25% | 0% | 59% | |
| Taken | 69 | 9 | 0 | 31 | 33 | 0 | 142 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 8% | 0% | 19% | 25% | 0% | 59% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 180 | 109 | 54 | 162 | 116 | 92 | 240 |
| Applied | 71 | 7 | 0 | 46 | 24 | 0 | 148 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 6% | 0% | 28% | 21% | 0% | 62% | |
| Taken | 71 | 7 | 0 | 46 | 24 | 0 | 148 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 6% | 0% | 28% | 21% | 0% | 62% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 93 | 46 | 139 | 54 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 87 | 15 | 0 | 85 | 65 | 0 | 252 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 16% | 0% | 61% | 120% | 0% | 105% | |
| Taken | 87 | 15 | 0 | 85 | 54 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 16% | 0% | 61% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 134 | 54 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 100 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 80 | 64 | 0 | 250 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 60% | 119% | 0% | 104% | |
| Taken | 100 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 80 | 54 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 60% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 105 | 105 | 67 | 134 | 56 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 95 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 79 | 80 | 0 | 266 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 59% | 143% | 0% | 111% | |
| Taken | 95 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 79 | 56 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 59% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 200 | 105 | 105 | 68 | 136 | 67 | 36 | 240 |
| Applied | 95 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 69 | 31 | 0 | 204 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 51% | 46% | 0% | 85% | |
| Taken | 95 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 69 | 31 | 0 | 204 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 51% | 46% | 0% | 85% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 280 | 280 | 280 | 86 | 174 | 102 | 10 | 280 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 92 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 41% | 90% | 0% | 59% | |
| Taken | 98 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 72 | 92 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 41% | 90% | 0% | 97% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 85 | 172 | 82 | 36 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90 | 46 | 0 | 137 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 52% | 56% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 89 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 90 | 46 | 0 | 237 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 52% | 56% | 0% | 88% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 66 | 131 | 22 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 110 | 23 | 0 | 134 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 84% | 105% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 99 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 109 | 22 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 83% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 64 | 128 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 128 | 0 | 0 | 128 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 100 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 128 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 63 | 124 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 152 | 0 | 0 | 154 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 123% | 0% | 0% | 64% | |
| Taken | 102 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 0% | 5% | 3% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 74 | 132 | 15 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 119 | 26 | 0 | 161 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 22% | 90% | 173% | 0% | 60% | |
| Taken | 111 | 0 | 11 | 16 | 119 | 15 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 4% | 22% | 90% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 75 | 143 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 144 | 0 | 0 | 151 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9% | 101% | 0% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 113 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 143 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 0% | 3% | 9% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 64 | 120 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 152 | 0 | 0 | 162 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 16% | 127% | 0% | 0% | 60% | |
| Taken | 133 | 0 | 9 | 10 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 0% | 3% | 16% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 81 | 158 | 1 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 157 | 5 | 0 | 166 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 99% | 500% | 0% | 69% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 157 | 1 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 3% | 5% | 99% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Edgefield Primary School.
"Best primary school as a efps alumni. Rich in culture, helpful teachers with an encouraging principal. 10/10 in terms of hygiene and cleanliness. Love the school food, healthy yet tasty ! Strongly promotes learning through play. i have had an extremely good experience studying here for 6 years. This school is great as a neighbourhood school."
March 10, 2025
"This school was amazing until the new principle came and ruined everything the school is very racist mean and alot of bulling cases don't recommend this school as it feels like a dating school as people come there and date and they are toxic and racists don't recommend as they rot people brain I graduated from this school and I'm telling you this school is toxic and horrible and on the toilet celling there is tissue paper and the canteen toilet door don't close properly and the toilet itself is not clean and some of the teacher are not kind some did not care about the student only the money and don't hear you when ur hurt and need someone to talk to from p1 to p3 was great p4 to p6 was horrible as all the Indian kids were being bullied by racist people and make us feel horrible some of us had to bully others to be popular I hate this school 1 star"
March 27, 2025
"Went for the Orientation, not the best in term of maintenances appearance, a bit run down and the garden is a joke. Students are well behaved but times will tell. My child is settling in quite fast, already make few friends. Seems to have few foreigners student. Principal speak lengthy on nurturing a better person, treat others with respect, and pride itself having the best admin but perhaps walk the talk by responding to emails first. Send numerous email to school yet after 3months still no reply. If not for the CCA you offered and relatively close proximity, lesser of the bullying case, i might having second thoughts."
November 05, 2024
"This school was good until the new principal came this year, no one wants to hear your 1 hour speech at the end of a day. Worse way to end it lol. Stop making food options vegan, how will students get their protein?? WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE CHANGING THE SCHOOL MOTTO BRO 🙏🙏🙏"
February 20, 2025
"I love this school! the school is the first primary school in Punggol and the building is so cool with good layout and space. Additionally, the new design in front makes the building fresh."
October 26, 2024
"Last year i was in this school and the old principle (mr saw ) was kind as he make the school not a bully place but my younger brother study in the school hates the new one and like the old"
April 30, 2025