Fairfield Methodist School Primary, with an application rate of 116% (315 applications for 271 placements), is a highly competitive choice. This esteemed school has a celebrated history of academic excellence.
Recently, Fairfield was lauded for its groundbreaking holistic education approach, focusing on character development alongside academics. Unique programs like the school's emphasis on Sports and Arts, along with STEM education, set it apart.
Located in the heart of Dover, the school's prime location makes it a popular choice among Singaporean parents. Secure your child's place and let them be part of Fairfield's tradition of excellence.
Fairfield Methodist School Primary
Principal:
Mdm Wong Mei Foong
Vice Principals:
Mdm Quek Tsui Lan, Mr Kng Wee Beng
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
One-North MRT, Buona Vista MRT & Dover MRT
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
No photos available.
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 210 | 97 | 20 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 114 | 103 | 30 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 317 | |
| % Applied | 54% | 106% | 150% | 167% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 114 | 97 | 20 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 273 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 100% | 100% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 210 | 104 | 22 | 45 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 106 | 98 | 33 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 315 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 94% | 150% | 173% | 0% | 0% | 117% | |
| Taken | 106 | 98 | 22 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 94% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 210 | 94 | 20 | 40 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 116 | 103 | 52 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 337 | |
| % Applied | 55% | 110% | 260% | 165% | 0% | 0% | 125% | |
| Taken | 116 | 94 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 210 | 88 | 20 | 41 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 123 | 98 | 33 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 343 | |
| % Applied | 59% | 111% | 165% | 217% | 0% | 0% | 127% | |
| Taken | 123 | 88 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Taken | 59% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 230 | 106 | 31 | 23 | 24 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 124 | 75 | 27 | 41 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 339 | |
| % Applied | 54% | 71% | 87% | 178% | 300% | 0% | 0% | 126% | |
| Taken | 124 | 75 | 27 | 23 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 273 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 71% | 87% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 230 | 117 | 34 | 25 | 27 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 113 | 83 | 27 | 51 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 338 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 71% | 79% | 204% | 237% | 0% | 0% | 125% | |
| Taken | 113 | 83 | 27 | 25 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 275 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 71% | 79% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 102% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 230 | 123 | 61 | 32 | 34 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 107 | 62 | 36 | 51 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 297 | |
| % Applied | 47% | 50% | 59% | 159% | 121% | 0% | 0% | 110% | |
| Taken | 107 | 62 | 36 | 32 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 50% | 59% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 33 | 35 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 145% | 174% | 0% | 0% | 40% | |
| Taken | 99 | 71 | 34 | 31 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 26% | 13% | 94% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 29 | 34 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 73 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 90% | 138% | 0% | 0% | 27% | |
| Taken | 123 | 62 | 27 | 24 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 23% | 10% | 83% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 23 | 28 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 74 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 148% | 143% | 0% | 0% | 27% | |
| Taken | 122 | 73 | 29 | 18 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 27% | 11% | 78% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 31 | 31 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 95 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 155% | 152% | 0% | 0% | 35% | |
| Taken | 124 | 54 | 30 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 20% | 11% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 26 | 28 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 196% | 207% | 0% | 0% | 40% | |
| Taken | 126 | 34 | 58 | 24 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 13% | 21% | 92% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 19 | 19 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 116 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 263% | 347% | 0% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 140 | 27 | 65 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 10% | 24% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 32 | 31 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 119 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 194% | 184% | 0% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 131 | 27 | 49 | 32 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 10% | 18% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 48 | 49 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 122 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 138% | 114% | 0% | 0% | 45% | |
| Taken | 111 | 19 | 45 | 48 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 7% | 17% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 55 | 55 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 145 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 145% | 118% | 0% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 97 | 19 | 43 | 56 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 7% | 16% | 102% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Fairfield Methodist School Primary.
No reviews available for this school.