Fengshan Primary School

307 BEDOK NORTH ROAD , 469680

65860123

At a glance

Fengshan Primary School, located in the heart of Bedok, boasts an application rate of 113%, reflecting high demand from 207 applicants vying for 183 spots. Recognised for its achievements in the National Primary School Games, Fengshan cultivates young talents in sports.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Bedok MRT
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Bedok MRT
Principal

MISS WONG LIANG- JI TABITHA

Vice Principals

MADAM LAI KAI CHING, MS SIEW GEOK LING (SHAO YULING)

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
95% 105% 115% 125% 135% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 105% 102% 114% 101%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
114%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 135%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 58 23 69 0 0
Applied 62 51 0 93 0 0
Taken 62 51 0 69 0 0
Taken Rate 52% 88% 0% 135% - -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
115%
Taken Rate
102%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 123%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 52 21 62 180 180
Applied 68 62 1 76 0 0
Taken 68 52 1 62 0 0
Taken Rate 57% 119% 5% 123% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
112%
Taken Rate
102%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 186%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 67 31 96 21 180
Applied 53 33 2 75 39 0
Taken 53 33 2 75 21 0
Taken Rate 44% 49% 6% 78% 186% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
112%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 130%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 36 25 73 180 180
Applied 84 22 1 95 0 0
Taken 84 22 1 73 0 0
Taken Rate 70% 61% 4% 130% 0% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
106%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 112%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 70 70 41 81 180 180
Applied 70 0 29 1 91 0 0
Taken 70 0 29 1 81 0 0
Taken Rate 50% 0% 41% 2% 112% 0% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
127%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 177%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 51 50 31 62 180 180
Applied 89 1 28 0 110 0 0
Taken 89 1 28 0 62 0 0
Taken Rate 64% 2% 56% 0% 177% 0% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
105%
Taken Rate
102%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 106%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 70 71 46 93 180 180
Applied 70 0 20 0 99 0 0
Taken 70 0 20 0 93 0 0
Taken Rate 50% 0% 28% 0% 106% 0% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
57%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 113%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 53 102 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 4 115 0 0
Taken 70 1 33 4 102 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 8% 113% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
62%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 147%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 61 121 15 210
Applied 0 0 0 2 107 22 0
Taken 72 0 16 1 106 15 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 88% 147% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 100%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 54 103 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 6 103 0 0
Taken 51 1 51 4 103 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 11% 100% 0% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 123%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 42 80 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 6 98 0 0
Taken 99 0 27 4 80 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 14% 123% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
55%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 131%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 45 88 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 1 115 0 0
Taken 88 0 33 1 88 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 131% 0% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
48%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 120%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 43 81 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 4 97 0 0
Taken 92 0 33 4 81 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 9% 120% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
51%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 107%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 50 97 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 3 104 0 0
Taken 79 0 31 3 97 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 6% 107% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
55%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 149%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 39 76 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 2 113 0 0
Taken 103 0 29 2 76 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 5% 149% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 107%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 44 85 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 3 91 0 0
Taken 104 0 18 3 85 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 7% 107% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Fengshan Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"A teacher claimed my son played with the incline pull up equipment when he just came to the ISH to borrow a ball. He saw someone else playing with the equipments but it was not him."

Jamilah Said

April 16, 2025

"I saw one students knock down my father’s McDonald’s drink and then walked away without helping my dad. However this is one off incident and I believe this school this has good students"

Koh Jun Wei Matthew (Bedokviewss)

April 10, 2025

"When teachers are faced with parents they are all very friendly but with children they are all very mean also they should fire the bus 2 driver because he always fat shame students and the only good thing there is the cat also I would’ve gave this school 0 stars but I had to give 1"

Mr banana Pants

March 03, 2025

"The school is located right beside a bus stop which is really convenient. The school has MOE Kindergarten located within, as well partnership with CDAC to provided affordable tuition to children from low income families. The students here seem really happy and I believe they enjoyed studying here. The teachers are responsible and caring."

Jaz L.

February 24, 2025

"quality of pe equipment is very bad, students there also have terrible behaviour. After school, I always hear kids cursing out loud and I also see some people vaping."

Jona

October 10, 2024

"6 students sprayed water at me using the cooling water near the parking lot. Atmosphere and looks inside 10/10, Students behaviour 2/10. P6's 0/10. Wouldnt Recommend. But very nice school to make core memories."

TacticalNoob4557

July 09, 2023

"The admin , Mdm Rosnah is so unfriendly and her voice tone seems to be so rude. I have not even finish my sentence and she can ask whether I am done. I have encountered this like twice. It is not nice for her to not have a proper communication with the parents. While the rest of the admin or whoever that pick up the phone are all ok and friendly except for her alone. If she can’t handle phone calls , then I think she shouldn’t be the one to pick up phone calls… The Teachers are all nice and happy that I enrol my son in the school. But this admin MDM ROSNAH should learn how to learn how to be more patient and polite."

Mastura Abdul Azeez

January 10, 2022

Write A Review