Frontier Primary School, situated in the heart of Singapore, has a competitive application rate of 130%, calculated from 274 applications and 210 placements. This indicates a high demand for Frontier's unique blend of academic and co-curricular excellence.
The school has been recognised for its innovative STEM programs and sports achievements. Its recent news of winning the National Robotics Competition is a testament to its commitment towards nurturing future-ready learners.
The school's highly competitive application trend underscores its status as a top choice for parents seeking a holistic, high-quality education for their children in Primary 1.
Frontier Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Lee Yew Koon Tonnine
Vice Principals:
Ms Wong Shi-Lei, Mdm Chan Yee Chin Wilna
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Pioneer MRT Station (EW28)
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 150 | 66 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 84 | 78 | 23 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 251 | |
| % Applied | 56% | 118% | 115% | 165% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 84 | 66 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 56% | 100% | 100% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 150 | 59 | 20 | 43 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 91 | 77 | 17 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 274 | |
| % Applied | 61% | 131% | 85% | 207% | 0% | 0% | 130% | |
| Taken | 91 | 59 | 17 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 61% | 100% | 85% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 81 | 20 | 48 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 69 | 88 | 13 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 233 | |
| % Applied | 46% | 109% | 65% | 131% | 0% | 0% | 111% | |
| Taken | 69 | 81 | 13 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 100% | 65% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 150 | 70 | 20 | 46 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 80 | 92 | 14 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Applied | 53% | 131% | 70% | 185% | 0% | 0% | 129% | |
| Taken | 80 | 70 | 14 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 53% | 100% | 70% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 170 | 83 | 82 | 21 | 29 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 87 | 1 | 111 | 14 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 1% | 135% | 67% | 200% | 0% | 0% | 129% | |
| Taken | 87 | 1 | 82 | 14 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 1% | 100% | 67% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 170 | 71 | 71 | 20 | 23 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 99 | 0 | 71 | 17 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 258 | |
| % Applied | 58% | 0% | 100% | 85% | 309% | 0% | 0% | 123% | |
| Taken | 99 | 0 | 71 | 17 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 0% | 100% | 85% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 91 | 92 | 35 | 59 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 79 | 0 | 64 | 11 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 217 | |
| % Applied | 46% | 0% | 70% | 31% | 107% | 0% | 0% | 103% | |
| Taken | 79 | 0 | 64 | 11 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 0% | 70% | 31% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 25 | 25 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 73 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 104% | 188% | 0% | 0% | 30% | |
| Taken | 135 | 1 | 55 | 24 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 56% | 0% | 23% | 96% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 53 | 82 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 119 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 49% | 113% | 0% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 103 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 74 | 130 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 102% | 0% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 92 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 130 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 75 | 123 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 131 | 0 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 35% | 107% | 0% | 0% | 65% | |
| Taken | 87 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 123 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 2% | 35% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 78 | 124 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 175 | 0 | 0 | 207 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 41% | 141% | 0% | 0% | 86% | |
| Taken | 83 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 0% | 41% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 91 | 140 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 178 | 0 | 0 | 219 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 127% | 0% | 0% | 91% | |
| Taken | 57 | 1 | 1 | 41 | 140 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 110 | 214 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 258 | 0 | 0 | 263 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 121% | 0% | 0% | 110% | |
| Taken | 20 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 214 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 8% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 120 | 235 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 278 | 0 | 0 | 283 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 118% | 0% | 0% | 118% | |
| Taken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 235 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Frontier Primary School.
"If compare with all the primary schools from Boon Lay area up to Jurong West , based on chats among parents , I will give this rating and I believe the school have no means of stretching the academically and holistically."
October 07, 2024
"Frontier Primary School 先锋小学 One of the newest primary school I Jurong West, it gives more option to family with younger children within the region. This young school, Frontier Primary School will have their 1st PSLE in 2017. Good luck to all school goers and teachers. Last update/ review Feb2017"
March 19, 2017
"Not sure about the school performance, only went there for badminton on weekend. Like some other people mentioned, the floor is slippery and u need to climb up 5 levels before reaching the courts."
July 30, 2024
"(In the perspective of a former student) Frontier Primary is a really good school. Food is fine. My science teachers really know what they are doing. They are strict but funny too. Lots of activities to do during recess. They even have a game room opened during recess! Students are fine, some are naughty but smart. 👍"
March 27, 2024
"I only went there for booking badminton court, so I will tell you how to get in. Upon facing the front gate, turn towards your left and keep going until there is a gate. Walk into the gate and walk up the staircase. Just keep going until you reach level 5 which will be a bit tedious, and then there is the ISH and then open the door. All schools in Singapore are good schools, which means that this school is a good school too!"
July 21, 2023