Fuhua Primary School

65 JURONG EAST STREET 13 , 609647

65624370

At a glance

Fuhua Primary School, situated in the heart of Jurong West, is a highly competitive institution with a 100% application rate. This vibrant school is known for its strong emphasis on holistic education, blending both academic and co-curricular activities.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
JURONG EAST MRT STATION
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: JURONG EAST MRT STATION
Principal

MR GANESAN S/O RAMAN

Vice Principals

MADAM SEOW SWEE NEO CHRISTINA, MS SAIMA HANIF D/O MOHAMED HANIF

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
60% 75% 90% 105% 120% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 104% 100% 71% 71%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
71%
Taken Rate
71%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 47%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 85 39 119 88 66
Applied 75 28 0 31 22 0
Taken 75 28 0 31 22 0
Taken Rate 47% 33% 0% 26% 25% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
280
Applied Rate
67%
Taken Rate
67%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 29%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 220 159 60 182 132 94
Applied 61 38 0 50 38 0
Taken 61 38 0 50 38 0
Taken Rate 28% 24% 0% 27% 29% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
81%
Taken Rate
81%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 42%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 99 43 128 74 43
Applied 61 30 2 54 31 0
Taken 61 30 2 54 31 0
Taken Rate 38% 30% 5% 42% 42% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
107%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 152%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 37 27 83 21 180
Applied 83 15 0 62 32 0
Taken 83 15 0 62 21 0
Taken Rate 69% 41% 0% 75% 152% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
106%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 124%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 92 92 54 108 50 220
Applied 88 0 25 0 58 62 0
Taken 88 0 25 0 58 50 0
Taken Rate 49% 0% 27% 0% 54% 124% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
111%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 217%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 94 94 56 113 18 210
Applied 76 0 23 0 96 39 0
Taken 76 0 23 0 96 18 0
Taken Rate 45% 0% 24% 0% 85% 217% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
104%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 116%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 88 88 52 104 51 210
Applied 82 0 24 1 53 59 0
Taken 82 0 24 1 53 51 0
Taken Rate 48% 0% 27% 2% 51% 116% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
63%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 115%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 70 141 52 240
Applied 0 0 0 1 89 60 0
Taken 75 0 25 0 89 52 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 63% 115% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
97%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 79%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 43 85 24 5
Applied 0 0 0 1 61 19 0
Taken 68 0 27 0 61 19 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 72% 79% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 92%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 53 108 38 3
Applied 0 0 0 0 70 35 0
Taken 72 0 32 0 70 35 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 65% 92% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
92%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 65%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 70 139 49 19
Applied 0 0 0 0 90 30 0
Taken 83 0 18 0 90 30 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 65% 61% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
53%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 127%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 60 119 30 240
Applied 0 0 0 0 90 38 0
Taken 85 0 36 0 89 30 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 76% 127% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 76%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 69 136 55 240
Applied 0 0 0 1 82 42 0
Taken 79 0 24 1 82 55 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 60% 76% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
56%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 86%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 71 141 50 240
Applied 0 0 0 0 92 43 0
Taken 79 0 20 0 92 50 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 65% 86% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
85%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 47%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 76 153 87 42
Applied 0 0 0 0 67 41 0
Taken 99 0 20 0 66 45 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 44% 47% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
51%
Taken Rate
92%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 73%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 78 155 77 12
Applied 0 0 0 3 78 56 0
Taken 98 0 14 3 78 56 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 4% 50% 73% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Fuhua Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"MOE needs to review the girls uniform. The collar is way too low, loose and revealing. The whole cutting is awful. The girls are not able to remove the blouse on their own as the armpit area is too tight."

Pops O (Pops)

March 09, 2025

"I am in 5 fruglity am i going to make this school 5star in 2025"

Sai koko

February 15, 2025

"Enjoy my 6 years in this school! Teachers here are strict but understanding. No school is perfect, thats why i rate it 4 star. Overall teachers here try their best to make learning enjoyable for students by coming up with field trips and inter class competition."

Eng CF

November 10, 2024

"Teachers are rude here and people stealing stuff. I told a teacher that my glasses were missing and someone threw it away and told me that it is my fault"

Mildric Ko

August 28, 2024

"The only reason this school deserves a 2 and not a 1 is simply because of two reasons; one is that the food here is alright and the second is that only two teachers were nice towards me during my entire 6 years and actually supported me. The other teachers were completely uneducated on how to teach students, some of which spending the entire lesson scolding us. This is pretty irresponsible of the teachers. I may have gotten into River Valley High School but what about the other students? They were not properly taught and thus ended up with worse grades."

isaac kee

August 26, 2024

"Very bad experience in this school when I studied here many years ago. Teachers were unkind and call students ‘special’ when they do any little slight mischief and bring their confidence down. Was bullied to the point of dreading to go to school everyday by classmates and students but teachers didn’t care. Eventually ended up transferring out to another school where I had a much better experience. Am so thankful for the opportunity to transfer given by the other school till this date. Some of these teachers who were nasty to me are still in this school. Best to completely avoid."

Shreeisa- Bangkokian

March 20, 2024

Write A Review