Geylang Methodist School Primary, with a competitive application rate of 101%, is a popular choice among Singaporean parents. The school received 278 applications for 274 available spots, reflecting its high demand.
Known for its emphasis on holistic education, Geylang Methodist offers robust programs in sports, arts, and STEM. The school's location, in the heart of Geylang, provides a culturally rich environment for students.
Recent achievements include remarkable performances in national-level competitions, further enhancing its reputation. Considering the competitive application rate, parents are encouraged to consider factors like the school's unique programs and strong community spirit to gauge their chances of enrolment.
Geylang Methodist School Primary
Principal:
Mdm Leong Beng Yuet Daphne
Vice Principals:
Mr Lua Ee Ping, Ms Ang Siok Phing
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Aljunied
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
No photos available.
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 210 | 113 | 47 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 97 | 31 | 4 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Applied | 46% | 27% | 9% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 97 | 31 | 4 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 27% | 9% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 210 | 124 | 52 | 153 | 44 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 86 | 27 | 8 | 109 | 48 | 0 | 278 | |
| % Applied | 41% | 22% | 15% | 71% | 109% | 0% | 103% | |
| Taken | 86 | 27 | 8 | 109 | 44 | 0 | 274 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 22% | 15% | 71% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 210 | 108 | 45 | 132 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 102 | 32 | 4 | 134 | 0 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 30% | 9% | 102% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Taken | 102 | 32 | 4 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 30% | 9% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 210 | 107 | 44 | 129 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 103 | 34 | 4 | 131 | 0 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 32% | 9% | 102% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Taken | 103 | 34 | 4 | 129 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 32% | 9% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 230 | 143 | 133 | 76 | 141 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 87 | 10 | 22 | 10 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 7% | 17% | 13% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Taken | 87 | 10 | 22 | 10 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 7% | 17% | 13% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 230 | 146 | 136 | 75 | 141 | 18 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 84 | 10 | 27 | 10 | 123 | 36 | 0 | 290 | |
| % Applied | 37% | 7% | 20% | 13% | 87% | 200% | 0% | 107% | |
| Taken | 84 | 10 | 27 | 10 | 123 | 18 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 7% | 20% | 13% | 87% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 230 | 140 | 136 | 78 | 150 | 42 | 7 | 270 |
| Applied | 90 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 108 | 35 | 0 | 268 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 4% | 15% | 13% | 72% | 83% | 0% | 99% | |
| Taken | 90 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 108 | 35 | 0 | 268 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 4% | 15% | 13% | 72% | 83% | 0% | 99% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 72 | 136 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 151 | 0 | 0 | 161 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 111% | 0% | 0% | 60% | |
| Taken | 102 | 2 | 22 | 8 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 1% | 8% | 11% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 80 | 152 | 12 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 140 | 14 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 92% | 117% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 79 | 6 | 25 | 8 | 140 | 12 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 2% | 9% | 10% | 92% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 80 | 154 | 30 | 12 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 125 | 18 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9% | 81% | 60% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 89 | 1 | 21 | 5 | 124 | 18 | 0 | 258 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 8% | 6% | 81% | 60% | 0% | 96% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 72 | 136 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 142 | 0 | 0 | 151 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 104% | 0% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 99 | 1 | 27 | 7 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 0% | 10% | 10% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 80 | 149 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 163 | 0 | 0 | 174 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 109% | 0% | 0% | 64% | |
| Taken | 81 | 2 | 27 | 11 | 149 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 1% | 10% | 14% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 72 | 125 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 137 | 0 | 0 | 155 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 110% | 0% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 108 | 1 | 18 | 18 | 125 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 0% | 7% | 25% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 73 | 138 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 146 | 0 | 0 | 153 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 106% | 0% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 102 | 0 | 23 | 7 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 9% | 10% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 66 | 125 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 140 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 12% | 106% | 0% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 111 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 125 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 10% | 12% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 76 | 145 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 175 | 0 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 121% | 0% | 0% | 67% | |
| Taken | 98 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 145 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 7% | 8% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Geylang Methodist School Primary.
No reviews available for this school.