Greenwood Primary School

11 WOODLANDS DR 62 , 737942

63666158

At a glance

Greenwood Primary School, known for its 100% application rate, is a highly competitive choice for parents seeking Primary 1 admission in Singapore. Nestled in the heart of Woodlands, Greenwood thrives in its unique holistic education approach, offering a wide range of programs including sports, arts, and STEM.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Admiralty MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Admiralty MRT Station
Principal

MADAM TANG PEI LU TRICILIA

Vice Principals

MR KIRUPANANTHA KUMAR S/O PALAIYAN, MR LEE HUAN SIAK

Website

http://www.greenwoodpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

greenwood_ps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
85% 91% 98% 104% 110% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 105% 100% 103% 100%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
103%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 138%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 41 30 91 16 0
Applied 109 10 0 75 22 0
Taken 109 10 0 75 16 0
Taken Rate 73% 24% 0% 82% 138% -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
93%
Taken Rate
93%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 75%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 66 38 115 55 14
Applied 84 11 0 60 41 0
Taken 84 11 0 60 41 0
Taken Rate 56% 17% 0% 52% 75% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
100%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 97%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 82 42 123 34 1
Applied 99 16 3 89 33 0
Taken 99 16 3 89 33 0
Taken Rate 55% 20% 7% 72% 97% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
101%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 106%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 85 46 138 31 240
Applied 95 6 1 107 33 0
Taken 95 6 1 107 31 0
Taken Rate 53% 7% 2% 78% 106% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
101%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 107%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 119 119 74 147 46 240
Applied 81 0 11 1 101 49 0
Taken 81 0 11 1 101 46 0
Taken Rate 41% 0% 9% 1% 69% 107% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
102%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 112%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 107 108 70 139 26 240
Applied 93 0 9 0 114 29 0
Taken 93 0 9 0 114 26 0
Taken Rate 47% 0% 8% 0% 82% 112% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
105%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 1100%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 88 88 61 117 1 210
Applied 82 0 7 4 116 11 0
Taken 82 0 7 4 116 1 0
Taken Rate 48% 0% 8% 7% 99% 1100% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
61%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 101%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 73 140 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 6 141 0 0
Taken 85 0 9 6 140 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 8% 101% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
60%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 97%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 63 124 30 1
Applied 0 0 0 2 94 29 0
Taken 75 0 10 1 94 29 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 76% 97% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
39%
Taken Rate
76%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 55%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 66 130 58 51
Applied 0 0 0 2 72 7 0
Taken 73 0 6 1 72 7 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 55% 12% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
44%
Taken Rate
84%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 62%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 72 140 53 39
Applied 0 0 0 4 87 14 0
Taken 81 0 16 3 87 14 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 6% 62% 26% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
53%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 100%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 63 119 15 240
Applied 0 0 0 6 107 15 0
Taken 102 0 13 6 104 15 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 10% 90% 100% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
47%
Taken Rate
95%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 72%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 68 128 38 14
Applied 0 0 0 7 92 13 0
Taken 93 0 12 7 91 24 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 10% 72% 34% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
44%
Taken Rate
102%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 100%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 51 94 13 240
Applied 0 0 0 7 85 13 0
Taken 126 0 13 7 85 13 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 14% 90% 100% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
44%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 129%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 42 77 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 6 99 0 0
Taken 140 0 17 6 77 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 14% 129% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
49%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 105%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 63 117 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 8 123 0 0
Taken 137 0 8 8 117 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 13% 105% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Greenwood Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"Very good school, recommend 👍👍👍"

Joc
Joc

March 12, 2025

"My son say this school is no good because people riling up students,noisy class and bad attitude."

Lim Bon An
Lim Bon An

November 19, 2024

"I was from greenwood from 2021-2023 I was a transfer student as I was moving,to be honest,greenwood was a pretty good school and my teachers was pretty reasonable but it's true the toilet are dirty but I don't blame the janitors because they are super nice and always do great at their job"

Zayne
Zayne

January 16, 2024

"I graduated from this school in 2019 (currently Sec 4) and I have to say this school has a lot of memories I can't keep quiet about. Firstly, the teachers, some are okay, others scold for no reason but 60% okay they are likable. Secondly, toilets. Thank you to the cleaners for trying to clean it but due to some students there making it dirty, never going in ever. Thirdly, I have a little sister in the school, primary 2 and I have to say the homework is getting harder than I expected. Come on man, their primary 2 and you giving primary 4 work? Wth.. at least I give three stars because I'm nice enough otherwise two."

Betrayed 1x1x1x1's wife
Betrayed 1x1x1x1's wife

February 05, 2023

"I’ve graduated from Greenwood a year ago, it was a nice experience but I was slightly disappointed with the classmates I seen as there are some who pick up fights nearly every day. Nevertheless, I love the students and I indeed enjoyed the experience that occurred. However, I was indeed frustrated that there were students recently out of school wearing their uniforms smoking and vaping and was doing it nearly infront of it. I do hope that the teachers or principals noticed this issue and teach them a lesson before something bad occurs"

Veldora Tempest
Veldora Tempest

November 17, 2022

Write A Review