Situated in the heart of Towner, Hong Wen School boasts an application rate of 125%, reflecting its high popularity among Singaporean parents. The school's rigorous academics and holistic approach have seen an impressive surge of 266 applications for 213 placements.
Notably, Hong Wen School was recently recognized for its outstanding Chinese Language Special Programme, reinforcing its dedication to bilingual excellence. With a focus on character development through their unique Co-Curricular Activities, Hong Wen School continues to stand out as a competitive choice for Primary 1 admission.
Offering a vibrant blend of tradition and innovation, Hong Wen is an ideal learning hub catering to the diverse needs of young learners.
Hong Wen School
Principal:
Mdm Ng Yin Lieng Theresa
Vice Principals:
Mr Ong Sze Chong Bryan , Ms Teo Ai Lin
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Boon Keng MRT
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 150 | 62 | 28 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 88 | 38 | 23 | 153 | 0 | 0 | 302 | |
| % Applied | 59% | 61% | 82% | 247% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 88 | 38 | 23 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 59% | 61% | 82% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 150 | 72 | 32 | 71 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 78 | 38 | 26 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 266 | |
| % Applied | 52% | 53% | 81% | 175% | 0% | 0% | 127% | |
| Taken | 78 | 38 | 26 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 53% | 81% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 69 | 32 | 69 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 82 | 34 | 30 | 151 | 0 | 0 | 297 | |
| % Applied | 55% | 49% | 94% | 219% | 0% | 0% | 141% | |
| Taken | 82 | 34 | 30 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 215 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 49% | 94% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 102% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 150 | 77 | 36 | 83 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 74 | 29 | 27 | 135 | 0 | 0 | 265 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 38% | 75% | 163% | 0% | 0% | 126% | |
| Taken | 74 | 29 | 27 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 38% | 75% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 170 | 87 | 70 | 45 | 71 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 83 | 17 | 22 | 19 | 149 | 0 | 0 | 290 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 20% | 31% | 42% | 210% | 0% | 0% | 138% | |
| Taken | 83 | 17 | 22 | 19 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 212 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 20% | 31% | 42% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 170 | 95 | 84 | 50 | 73 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 75 | 11 | 24 | 27 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 275 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 12% | 29% | 54% | 189% | 0% | 0% | 131% | |
| Taken | 75 | 11 | 24 | 27 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 12% | 29% | 54% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 86 | 78 | 48 | 64 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 84 | 8 | 23 | 33 | 116 | 0 | 0 | 264 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 9% | 29% | 69% | 181% | 0% | 0% | 126% | |
| Taken | 84 | 8 | 23 | 33 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 212 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 9% | 29% | 69% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 28 | 28 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 117 | 0 | 0 | 145 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 418% | 0% | 0% | 69% | |
| Taken | 111 | 11 | 33 | 27 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 53% | 5% | 16% | 96% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 47 | 55 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 136 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 83% | 176% | 0% | 0% | 65% | |
| Taken | 86 | 8 | 23 | 38 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 4% | 11% | 81% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 53 | 80 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 122 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 57% | 115% | 0% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 75 | 11 | 18 | 26 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 5% | 9% | 49% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 39 | 48 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 116 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 77% | 179% | 0% | 0% | 55% | |
| Taken | 90 | 10 | 33 | 29 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 5% | 16% | 74% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 46 | 46 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 131 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 137% | 148% | 0% | 0% | 62% | |
| Taken | 93 | 3 | 22 | 46 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 1% | 10% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 51 | 51 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 155 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 141% | 163% | 0% | 0% | 74% | |
| Taken | 79 | 5 | 24 | 51 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 2% | 11% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 46 | 45 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 126% | 196% | 0% | 0% | 70% | |
| Taken | 86 | 7 | 26 | 46 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 3% | 12% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 53 | 57 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 94% | 175% | 0% | 0% | 71% | |
| Taken | 77 | 3 | 24 | 49 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 1% | 11% | 92% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 66 | 88 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 153 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 65% | 125% | 0% | 0% | 73% | |
| Taken | 69 | 2 | 8 | 43 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 1% | 4% | 65% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Hong Wen School.
"it is my favourite school. The teachers teach us very well and the lessons are very fun and engaging. All the teachers are kind, I would recommend joining this school."
November 18, 2024
"idk how you guys all had some bad experience and some said the staffs were rude but i was in this sch for 6 years and nvr have i seen any of the staffs being rude to the students nor the guests they always try their best to understand us and this sch doesn’t js care about “grades” maybe they will if u dont do well and not try ur best u can fail but if u don’t put in the effort ofc they will scold u right? and wdym you guys told the teachers abt ur kids getting bullied and they didn’t do anyt cause from my experience they did they wld talk to ur kids abt getting bullied who knows maybe is ur kid bully others one sia dont anyhow say if u dk anyt😭😭"
December 14, 2024
"All my 4 kids attended this school, I’m really sad that ever since principal changed everything had changed, Hong Wen used to be strong In Chinese culture but now all they care is academics. Few years ago I would proudly recommend Hong Wen school but now I will not."
October 13, 2024
"There's a teacher go filp through my children bag without his permission. Is that even allowed???"
November 03, 2024
"A very bad school that only seems to care about grades.My daughter gets bullied and a regular class has 10 bullies! Though already reported to the school the form teachers did not even care at all! Only untill I reported to the teachers then they cared only a bit about my daughter. Highly discouraged to join as the school is like invested with bullies."
April 13, 2024
"This school is RIDICULOUS my son Feng Xiaotong gets bullied EVERY SINGLE DAY. She comes home crying. Called the teachers many times but nothing was done. Reported. NEVER go to this school, infested with bullies. Do not recommend. -Feng Wufeng, wife of Feng Xiaotong"
April 19, 2024