Jiemin Primary School

2 YISHUN STREET 71 , 768515

67586472

At a glance

Jiemin Primary School, nestled in the heart of Yishun, is a highly sought-after institution with a 100% application rate. This family-oriented school has a rich history of academic excellence and was lauded for its outstanding performance in the recent National Primary School Chinese Storytelling Competition.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Yishun MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Yishun MRT Station
Principal

MR ANDY MICKEY CHOONG TEK CHOY

Vice Principals

MRS NUR FATIMAH BTE ABDUL MALIK MRS NUR FATIMAH FRAUDER, MISS WONG KAH WAN JOY

Website

http://www.jieminpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

jiemin_ps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 101% 101% 79% 79%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
79%
Taken Rate
79%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 58%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 130 55 34 101 63 40
Applied 75 14 0 38 23 0
Taken 75 14 0 38 23 0
Taken Rate 58% 25% 0% 38% 37% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
92%
Taken Rate
92%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 73%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 130 74 39 116 60 16
Applied 56 18 0 56 44 0
Taken 56 18 0 56 44 0
Taken Rate 43% 24% 0% 48% 73% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
90%
Taken Rate
90%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 70%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 92 44 134 77 23
Applied 68 19 0 57 54 0
Taken 68 19 0 57 54 0
Taken Rate 43% 21% 0% 43% 70% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
103%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 123%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 46 28 83 22 180
Applied 74 22 1 62 27 0
Taken 74 22 1 62 22 0
Taken Rate 62% 48% 4% 75% 123% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
86%
Taken Rate
86%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 58%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 116 116 66 130 55 32
Applied 64 0 24 2 76 23 0
Taken 64 0 24 2 76 23 0
Taken Rate 36% 0% 21% 3% 58% 42% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
94%
Taken Rate
94%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 73%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 101 101 51 101 27 13
Applied 79 0 39 1 74 14 0
Taken 79 0 39 1 74 14 0
Taken Rate 44% 0% 39% 2% 73% 52% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
101%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 100%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 76 76 46 85 1 180
Applied 64 0 25 7 84 1 0
Taken 64 0 25 7 84 1 0
Taken Rate 46% 0% 33% 15% 99% 100% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
48%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 106%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 47 87 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 9 92 0 0
Taken 77 0 39 7 87 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 19% 106% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
54%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 114%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 43 77 180 180
Applied 0 0 0 10 88 0 0
Taken 70 0 24 9 77 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 23% 114% 0% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
93%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 76%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 54 102 24 13
Applied 0 0 0 5 78 11 0
Taken 54 0 19 5 78 11 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 9% 76% 46% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 113%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 41 76 180 180
Applied 0 0 0 8 86 0 0
Taken 75 0 23 6 76 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 20% 113% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
51%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 115%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 40 71 180 180
Applied 0 0 0 9 82 0 0
Taken 73 0 28 8 71 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 23% 115% 0% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
56%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 151%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 35 59 180 180
Applied 0 0 0 11 89 0 0
Taken 76 0 34 11 59 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 31% 151% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
57%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 120%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 44 80 180 180
Applied 0 0 0 7 96 0 0
Taken 70 0 23 7 80 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 16% 120% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
69%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 139%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 45 89 180 180
Applied 0 0 0 1 124 0 0
Taken 79 0 12 1 89 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 139% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
62%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 155%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 36 71 180 180
Applied 0 0 0 1 110 0 0
Taken 91 0 17 1 71 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 155% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Jiemin Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"My best friend is swim safer level one and the teacher forced her to float in the pool without any board and she started crying."

Family One
Family One

April 11, 2025

"This school is absolute garbage. Each and every teacher has no idea how to treat children. The way they deal with disciplinary issues is sub par. The teachers in this school treat boys like criminals in a jail cell, as if they had committed a major crime. The only way they deal with stuff is shouting, SHOUTING. If you see the other reviews you would know how loud they shout. Even from the nearby blocks you can hear the screaming. During o level they shout like they own Singapore liddat. Like do they not care about others? This school has traumatised me down to the very bone. If the school is reading this, please change your ways, I don’t want my brother to suffer the way I did."

Millard Tan Yu Lei (Nbss)
Millard Tan Yu Lei (Nbss)

February 19, 2025

"I was in a bus than a group of students from this school was talking and shouting so loud and talking with inaproprate words"

Marcus
Marcus

January 24, 2025

"I am from a student over there. I love this school. I will cherish my love like a treasure to this school when I have to say goodbye."

Aura Jannah
Aura Jannah

January 02, 2025

"Amazing school with friendly teachers especially my Form Teacher and Co-Form Teacher. Great students and fun events. Totally recommend this school to future Primary Schoolers."

Vinci Ang
Vinci Ang

November 13, 2024

"A typical, average neighbour government school in Yishun. Both teaching and non teaching staff are friendly. Majority of the students are from the neighbour."

Cynthia Adeline
Cynthia Adeline

October 12, 2018

Write A Review