Jing Shan Primary School

5 ANG MO KIO ST 52 , 569228

64566305

At a glance

Jing Shan Primary School, nestled in Ang Mo Kio, has an application rate of 120%, reflecting its popularity among parents. It's a competitive school, with 180 applications vying for just 150 placements last year.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Ang Mo Kio MRT
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Ang Mo Kio MRT
Principal

MADAM BOEY HUEY PENG SHARON

Vice Principals

MISS NG SUAT THENG ANGELA, MR JONATHON LOH

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
90% 99% 108% 116% 125% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 99% 99% 101% 99%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
101%
Taken Rate
99%
Highest Demand
2A
Highest demand: 2A at 104%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 46 20 60 10 1
Applied 44 48 0 50 9 0
Taken 44 46 0 50 9 0
Taken Rate 49% 104% 0% 83% 90% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
120%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2A
Highest demand: 2A at 163%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 30 20 60 150 150
Applied 60 49 0 71 0 0
Taken 60 30 0 60 0 0
Taken Rate 67% 163% 0% 118% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
110%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2A
Highest demand: 2A at 131%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 39 20 61 150 150
Applied 51 51 1 62 0 0
Taken 51 39 1 61 0 0
Taken Rate 57% 131% 5% 102% 0% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
100%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 100%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 35 24 72 5 150
Applied 55 22 1 67 5 0
Taken 55 22 1 67 5 0
Taken Rate 61% 63% 4% 93% 100% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
160
Applied Rate
102%
Taken Rate
102%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 100%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 56 56 37 75 5 160
Applied 64 0 22 0 72 5 0
Taken 64 0 22 0 72 5 0
Taken Rate 53% 0% 39% 0% 96% 100% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
160
Applied Rate
106%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 137%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 58 58 40 79 19 160
Applied 62 0 19 2 60 26 0
Taken 62 0 19 2 60 19 0
Taken Rate 52% 0% 33% 5% 76% 137% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
99%
Taken Rate
99%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 83%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 110 61 61 36 71 12 2
Applied 49 0 29 1 59 10 0
Taken 49 0 29 1 59 10 0
Taken Rate 45% 0% 48% 3% 83% 83% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
53%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 150%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 27 52 150 150
Applied 0 0 0 2 78 0 0
Taken 63 3 31 1 52 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 7% 150% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 106%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 32 64 150 150
Applied 0 0 0 0 68 0 0
Taken 64 0 22 0 64 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 106% 0% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
47%
Taken Rate
88%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 70%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 45 89 27 18
Applied 0 0 0 0 62 9 0
Taken 48 1 12 0 62 9 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 70% 33% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
39%
Taken Rate
74%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 54%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 59 119 55 49
Applied 0 0 0 0 64 6 0
Taken 50 0 13 0 64 6 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 54% 11% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
47%
Taken Rate
90%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 71%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 50 98 31 18
Applied 0 0 0 1 70 13 0
Taken 67 0 14 1 67 13 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 71% 42% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
28%
Taken Rate
74%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 34%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 60 119 79 47
Applied 0 0 0 1 41 9 0
Taken 38 0 22 1 41 32 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 34% 11% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
83%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 63%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 53 106 39 31
Applied 0 0 0 0 67 7 0
Taken 62 0 12 0 67 8 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 63% 18% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
51%
Taken Rate
92%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 74%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 54 107 29 16
Applied 0 0 0 2 79 10 0
Taken 59 0 13 2 79 13 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 4% 74% 34% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
34%
Taken Rate
68%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 46%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 59 119 64 52
Applied 0 0 0 0 55 6 0
Taken 47 1 13 0 55 6 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 46% 9% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Jing Shan Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"tchers are so biased and annoying here😭 i started stuttering so badly bc i was nervous from mdm shakila there are big bright motivational stickers everywhere around the school it hurts my eyes and does not make the school look nice to me the tchers here r very short tempered too im honestly glad i finished"

szeyjng ho

February 16, 2025

"I had a good experience here, the food was great even though there was not many stall. I made alot of new friends here is honestly great if you don't cause problem or get involved with anything like vaping,smoking or bullying."

NAAIW Wieiw

December 04, 2024

"I have great experience with Jingshan Primary! The general office staff are very kind and helpful. On top of that they are very prompt in following up the administrative work! I Great thumbs up to them!"

Summer He

November 21, 2024

"Don't know why appoint Little Professors as the child care provider. Cheap tender do not and will not give good provider. Don't give in and award tender solely on low charges. There should not be any condone of bad attitude and fear causing teachers. Being stern is totally fine to instil discipline but never because it is due to bad temper or frustration or teacher. Most of the teachers are very good just don't agree that they blindly protect and cover up without finding out facts. The head and pushed me away previously without taking ownership too. Feedback and received sarcastic remarks by the supervisor. School don't want to do things to resolve and asked to meet up without doinng anything or investigated the feedback to check if it was a valid allegation. Take things likely and some teacher are very fierce and intimidating and children are very scared but no one takes it seriously. Little professor supervisor even tried to be funny and suggested my child is actually playing and not really frightened or scared. Previously wrote to MOE about the admin staff that was extremely rude whom told me to shut up and another lost form and didn't do things properly and send email with wrong information and easily irritated but also pushed away back to the school to handle but there is nothing done properly no proper information. School just wants to brush things aside. MCCY also ignore and just push email away. So nowhere else to turn to."

Ray Poh

May 17, 2024

"As a parent, I find it distressing that despite numerous reports and instances of bullying, there seem to be a lack of proactive measures taken by the school Firstly, bullying should never be tolerated in any school, with no action taken. As a result, students are suffering emotionally and academically. Secondly, most teachers are nice but there is some who are displaying unprofessional behaviour, my daughter teacher kept mocking her for two year and that her whole class hates the teacher as she has said one of them was crazy and my daughter subject from AL4 to AL6 Additionally due to the fact that there’s not prefects or monitors, my daughter could not be a prefect, leader and a minister due to her lack of experience"

DIANA KHOO

April 17, 2024

Write A Review