Jurong Primary School

320 JURONG EAST Street 32 , 609476

65618837

At a glance

Jurong Primary School in Singapore, a thriving educational hub, has a 100% application rate, reflecting its popularity among local parents. Known for its strong commitment towards holistic development, Jurong is a home to 235 motivated learners each year.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Lakeside MRT Station, Jurong East MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Lakeside MRT Station, Jurong East MRT Station
Principal

MR LEONARD CHUA

Vice Principals

MISS TAN PEIRU, MR TAN YUAN SHIN

Website

http://www.jurongpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

jps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
80% 89% 98% 106% 115% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 102% 100% 85% 85%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
85%
Taken Rate
85%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 53%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 82 40 121 73 34
Applied 78 21 0 48 39 0
Taken 78 21 0 48 39 0
Taken Rate 49% 26% 0% 40% 53% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
98%
Taken Rate
98%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 93%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 107 48 144 86 6
Applied 73 23 0 59 80 0
Taken 73 23 0 59 80 0
Taken Rate 41% 21% 0% 41% 93% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
110%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 138%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 101 41 125 52 220
Applied 59 37 0 73 72 0
Taken 59 37 0 73 52 0
Taken Rate 37% 37% 0% 58% 138% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
109%
Taken Rate
102%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 152%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 40 26 82 27 180
Applied 80 21 0 55 41 0
Taken 80 21 0 55 27 0
Taken Rate 67% 53% 0% 67% 152% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
109%
Taken Rate
102%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 333%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 78 78 41 86 6 190
Applied 72 0 36 0 80 20 0
Taken 72 0 36 0 80 6 0
Taken Rate 48% 0% 46% 0% 93% 333% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
106%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 122%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 48 48 25 49 180 180
Applied 92 0 39 0 60 0 0
Taken 92 0 39 0 49 0 0
Taken Rate 66% 0% 81% 0% 122% 0% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
102%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 105%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 56 56 33 66 180 180
Applied 84 0 30 0 69 0 0
Taken 84 0 30 0 66 0 0
Taken Rate 60% 0% 54% 0% 105% 0% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
27%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 106%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 26 52 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 2 55 0 0
Taken 109 0 49 0 52 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 8% 106% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
44%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 200%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 44 90 2 210
Applied 0 0 0 0 88 4 0
Taken 82 0 40 0 88 2 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 98% 200% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
51%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 150%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 57 115 14 240
Applied 0 0 0 0 101 21 0
Taken 91 0 35 0 101 14 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 88% 150% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 106%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 44 81 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 10 86 0 0
Taken 102 0 50 7 81 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 23% 106% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
44%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 118%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 47 73 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 20 86 0 0
Taken 98 0 49 20 73 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 43% 118% 0% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
51%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 155%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 50 71 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 28 110 0 0
Taken 118 0 53 28 71 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 56% 155% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 116%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 59 99 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 19 115 0 0
Taken 114 0 39 19 99 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 32% 116% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
49%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 124%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 54 98 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 11 122 0 0
Taken 111 0 52 11 98 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 20% 124% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 138%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 51 88 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 14 121 0 0
Taken 124 0 44 14 88 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 27% 138% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Jurong Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"Not a bad school, graduating here. Ongoing construction works for new facilities. Quite new lift. But the canteen toilets are small, boys toilet only 1 cubicle but so many showers. Edit: been some time now, and I also want to say: Mr Pow, you were one of the best teachers during my time here. If youre still teaching, then keep it up! You were really friendly and kind and helped me a ton."

Lol Its cool
Lol Its cool

March 27, 2025

"Graduated from here, and I must say that the teachers are horrible. Don't even THINK of sending ur child here. The teachers teach horribly and don't even care abt ur mental wellbeing. There was even a male teacher who encourages students to "not talk" to a boy. He always dresses poorly and he lacks personal hygiene. This teacher made my grades drop a lot as he doesn't even teach in class and just wastes ur time. He also allegedly did something bad to a girl, though I didn't witness it myself, the girl is friends with me. I made some amazing friends there though, that's the only good part abt my pri sch life. And the Mega Block, they worked on it for so long and only opened up after I graduated?? Overall, I just really don't encourage sending ur child here."

isa
isa

February 22, 2025

"Bad the teaches won't let us eat some time and some time ask us questions"

Vanie
Vanie

January 18, 2025

"Its good school but strict teachers"

Callofdutyplayer
Callofdutyplayer

January 17, 2025

"Recently graduated from here School is not bad but some of the teachers are very strict and one of the teachers didn’t do anything when I was being bullied. The cubicles at the canteen are also very small. Other than that, it’s okay."

Nokia
Nokia

March 23, 2024

""

boy lay
boy lay

March 19, 2020

Write A Review