With a 100% application rate, Lianhua Primary School is a leading choice among parents in Singapore. The school is celebrated for its well-rounded curriculum and commitment to nurturing students' potential.
Recent achievements include outstanding PSLE results and various accolades in the National School Games. Located conveniently in Bukit Batok, Lianhua offers a vibrant learning environment, featuring robust programmes in sports, arts, and STEM.
Its strong emphasis on holistic development ensures that your child receives a comprehensive education. Lianhua Primary School is not just a school but a nurturing ground for future leaders.
Lianhua Primary School
Principal:
Ms Kiew Hui Li Pamela
Vice Principals:
Mdm Tan Wan Phing Janice, Mdm Mavis Siew Sook Ling
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Bukit Gombak/Bukit Batok
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 260 | 197 | 81 | 242 | 216 | 174 | 174 |
| Applied | 63 | 15 | 0 | 26 | 42 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Applied | 24% | 8% | 0% | 11% | 19% | 0% | 84% | |
| Taken | 63 | 15 | 0 | 26 | 42 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 8% | 0% | 11% | 19% | 0% | 84% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 260 | 200 | 80 | 242 | 211 | 136 | 320 |
| Applied | 60 | 19 | 0 | 31 | 75 | 0 | 185 | |
| % Applied | 23% | 10% | 0% | 13% | 36% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 60 | 19 | 0 | 31 | 75 | 0 | 185 | |
| % Taken | 23% | 10% | 0% | 13% | 36% | 0% | 58% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 260 | 207 | 84 | 252 | 216 | 165 | 320 |
| Applied | 53 | 17 | 0 | 36 | 51 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Applied | 20% | 8% | 0% | 14% | 24% | 0% | 49% | |
| Taken | 53 | 17 | 0 | 36 | 51 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Taken | 20% | 8% | 0% | 14% | 24% | 0% | 49% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 240 | 187 | 79 | 235 | 203 | 143 | 300 |
| Applied | 53 | 11 | 1 | 32 | 60 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Applied | 22% | 6% | 1% | 14% | 30% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 53 | 11 | 1 | 32 | 60 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Taken | 22% | 6% | 1% | 14% | 30% | 0% | 52% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 149 | 149 | 87 | 173 | 135 | 93 | 240 |
| Applied | 51 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 38 | 42 | 0 | 147 | |
| % Applied | 26% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 22% | 31% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 51 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 38 | 42 | 0 | 147 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 22% | 31% | 0% | 61% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 140 | 140 | 88 | 176 | 154 | 83 | 240 |
| Applied | 60 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 22 | 71 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Applied | 30% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 13% | 46% | 0% | 65% | |
| Taken | 60 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 22 | 71 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 13% | 46% | 0% | 65% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 103 | 104 | 68 | 135 | 105 | 71 | 180 |
| Applied | 37 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 30 | 34 | 0 | 110 | |
| % Applied | 26% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 22% | 32% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 37 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 30 | 34 | 0 | 110 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 22% | 32% | 0% | 61% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 78 | 156 | 112 | 94 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 18 | 0 | 62 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 16% | 0% | 30% | |
| Taken | 39 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 44 | 18 | 0 | 116 | |
| % Taken | 19% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 28% | 16% | 0% | 55% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 70 | 140 | 108 | 96 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 12 | 0 | 44 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 23% | 11% | 0% | 24% | |
| Taken | 31 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 32 | 12 | 0 | 84 | |
| % Taken | 17% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 23% | 11% | 0% | 47% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 150 | 150 | 150 | 52 | 103 | 79 | 68 | 150 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 11 | 0 | 36 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 14% | 0% | 24% | |
| Taken | 39 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 24 | 11 | 0 | 82 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 23% | 14% | 0% | 55% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 60 | 121 | 72 | 65 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 7 | 0 | 56 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 41% | 10% | 0% | 31% | |
| Taken | 54 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 49 | 7 | 0 | 116 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 41% | 10% | 0% | 64% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 70 | 139 | 105 | 101 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 40 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 26% | 4% | 0% | 19% | |
| Taken | 62 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 34 | 4 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 24% | 4% | 0% | 52% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 55 | 110 | 68 | 21 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 16 | 0 | 59 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 39% | 24% | 0% | 33% | |
| Taken | 56 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 42 | 47 | 0 | 159 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 38% | 69% | 0% | 88% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 79 | 158 | 101 | 51 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 7 | 0 | 64 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 7% | 0% | 30% | |
| Taken | 43 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 57 | 50 | 0 | 159 | |
| % Taken | 20% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 36% | 50% | 0% | 76% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 70 | 142 | 86 | 52 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 25 | 0 | 81 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 39% | 29% | 0% | 39% | |
| Taken | 61 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 56 | 34 | 0 | 160 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 39% | 40% | 0% | 76% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 68 | 135 | 71 | 21 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 38 | 0 | 103 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 48% | 54% | 0% | 49% | |
| Taken | 69 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 65 | 38 | 0 | 178 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 48% | 54% | 0% | 85% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Lianhua Primary School.
"I’m William from 2 respect 2 I love this school I make new friends every day"
March 08, 2025
"Lianhua Primary School is located along Bukit Batok St 52, beside Hillgrove Secondary School just a walking distance to Little Guilin Lake. Last update/ review Feb2017"
February 18, 2017
"I am Trisha from 2 Respect 7. I enjoy my school so much ."
October 09, 2024
"This year is my daughter final primary 6 level in this awesome school. No regret sending your precious kids to this school, as all teachers and admin staffs is all so helpful, friendly, and excellent👍👍👍 Prefect 👍👍👍"
October 29, 2021
"I graduated from this school and i am proud to give it 5 stars. There are still things to improve and I feel like it is not entirely the school's fault as parents might have influenced their child or other reasons. Bad things to note: -Students have vandalised the nearby playground. (It has become progressively worse, like really bad) -Students are very rowdy and noisy outside of school, sometimes screaming on the playground! Good things to note: -Teachers and staff members are very kind and approachable, they are always there to comfort and help students in need. -Programmes are very fun and have a wide variety, the students could learn from those programmes while having fun at the same time. -There are a lot of programmes dedicated to help the needy people and have changed lives forever. Please continue this, every little help counts and this may develop the child's overall character to become a better person and sympathise with people that are in need. -Lots and lots of variety! Variety in sports equipment, food, programmes, e.t.c. It is all there! -Teachers give advice and/or use their free time to teach students new things for their upcoming years. I cannot stress this enough, the teachers there are great. Conclusion: Students there sometimes go wild when they're dismissed from school, wish they were a little more behaved, but that may be out of your reach, I am not sure. Everything else is pretty great, so I would give this 5 stars, would bring my child here if I had one. Definitely a school that gives memorable moments! (Side note: I am sorry if there are grammatical errors, I am not perfect in English.)"
November 23, 2019