Methodist Girls' School Primary, located in the heart of Bukit Timah, boasts an application rate of 118%, indicating its high competitiveness. This prestigious school, with a rich history, has consistently produced top performers in the PSLE.
With 250 applications for 211 placements, gaining admission is a testament to your child's potential. Methodist Girls' School Primary is revered for its commitment to holistic education, offering special programs in sports, arts, and STEM.
The school's strong academic reputation, coupled with its unique programs, makes it an ideal choice for parents seeking a well-rounded education for their children in Singapore.
Methodist Girls School Primary
Principal:
Mdm Koh Ming-Li Valarie
Vice Principals:
Mdm Yeow Chern Ee, Mr Teng Tat Meng Charles
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
King Albert Park MRT
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
No photos available.
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 150 | 95 | 22 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 55 | 88 | 54 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 275 | |
| % Applied | 37% | 93% | 245% | 173% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 55 | 88 | 22 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 93% | 100% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 150 | 91 | 25 | 50 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 59 | 77 | 50 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 250 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 85% | 200% | 128% | 0% | 0% | 119% | |
| Taken | 59 | 77 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 85% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 86 | 21 | 43 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 64 | 83 | 38 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 248 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 97% | 181% | 147% | 0% | 0% | 118% | |
| Taken | 64 | 83 | 21 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 97% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 150 | 69 | 20 | 40 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 81 | 89 | 79 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 319 | |
| % Applied | 54% | 129% | 395% | 175% | 0% | 0% | 152% | |
| Taken | 81 | 69 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 170 | 92 | 23 | 27 | 27 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 78 | 69 | 9 | 45 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 252 | |
| % Applied | 46% | 75% | 39% | 167% | 189% | 0% | 0% | 120% | |
| Taken | 78 | 69 | 9 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 75% | 39% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 170 | 106 | 27 | 27 | 26 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 64 | 79 | 14 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 235 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 75% | 52% | 144% | 150% | 0% | 0% | 112% | |
| Taken | 64 | 79 | 14 | 27 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 75% | 52% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 108 | 23 | 21 | 21 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 62 | 85 | 22 | 40 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Applied | 36% | 79% | 96% | 190% | 152% | 0% | 0% | 115% | |
| Taken | 62 | 85 | 22 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 211 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 79% | 96% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 31 | 30 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 81 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 152% | 113% | 0% | 0% | 39% | |
| Taken | 66 | 68 | 15 | 31 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 32% | 7% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 31 | 31 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 80 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 152% | 106% | 0% | 0% | 38% | |
| Taken | 52 | 80 | 16 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 25% | 38% | 8% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 44 | 44 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 138 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 136% | 177% | 0% | 0% | 66% | |
| Taken | 62 | 48 | 13 | 43 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 23% | 6% | 98% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 26 | 26 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 69 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 158% | 108% | 0% | 0% | 33% | |
| Taken | 80 | 60 | 18 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 29% | 9% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 28 | 28 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 84 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 157% | 143% | 0% | 0% | 40% | |
| Taken | 73 | 60 | 21 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 29% | 10% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 40 | 38 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 105 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 143% | 126% | 0% | 0% | 50% | |
| Taken | 64 | 51 | 16 | 41 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 24% | 8% | 103% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 28 | 28 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 80 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 161% | 125% | 0% | 0% | 38% | |
| Taken | 70 | 59 | 25 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 28% | 12% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 35 | 35 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 101 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 143% | 146% | 0% | 0% | 48% | |
| Taken | 62 | 56 | 22 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 27% | 10% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 38 | 37 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 101 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 155% | 114% | 0% | 0% | 48% | |
| Taken | 69 | 39 | 27 | 38 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 19% | 13% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Methodist Girls School Primary.
No reviews available for this school.