Montfort Junior School

52 HOUGANG AVENUE 8, 538786

65101588

At a glance

Located in Hougang, Montfort Junior School is a distinguished institution with a 100% application rate. Excelling in both academics and co-curricular activities, it has garnered numerous accolades, including the School Excellence Award.

School Type
Government-aided Sch
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Hougang MRT & Bus Interchange
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government-aided Sch Boys' School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Hougang MRT & Bus Interchange
Principal

Mr Tan Boon Hong Victor

Vice Principals

Mdm Poh Lee Siew, Mr Tan Wee Boon

Website

http://www.montfortjunior.moe.edu.sg/

Email

montfort_js@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 87% 87% 47% 47%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
47%
Taken Rate
47%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 24%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 68 41 118 107 81
Applied 22 6 5 11 26 0
Taken 22 6 5 11 26 0
Taken Rate 24% 9% 12% 9% 24% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
68%
Taken Rate
68%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 47%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 62 39 114 90 48
Applied 28 5 3 24 42 0
Taken 28 5 3 24 42 0
Taken Rate 31% 8% 8% 21% 47% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
67%
Taken Rate
67%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 43%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 68 40 113 88 50
Applied 22 7 8 25 38 0
Taken 22 7 8 25 38 0
Taken Rate 24% 10% 20% 22% 43% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
95%
Taken Rate
95%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 89%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 90 64 38 101 72 8
Applied 26 9 15 29 64 0
Taken 26 9 15 29 64 0
Taken Rate 29% 14% 39% 29% 89% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
77%
Taken Rate
77%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 53%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 120 118 76 137 94 44
Applied 20 2 7 14 45 50 0
Taken 20 2 7 14 45 50 0
Taken Rate 14% 2% 6% 18% 33% 53% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
112%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 161%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 80 62 61 46 86 23 120
Applied 18 1 10 5 63 37 0
Taken 18 1 10 5 63 23 0
Taken Rate 23% 2% 16% 11% 73% 161% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
87%
Taken Rate
87%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 57%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 80 67 69 51 87 42 18
Applied 13 0 7 15 45 24 0
Taken 13 0 7 15 45 24 0
Taken Rate 16% 0% 10% 29% 52% 57% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
87%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 112%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 48 82 41 120
Applied 0 0 0 15 43 46 0
Taken 12 3 9 14 41 41 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 31% 52% 112% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
150
Applied Rate
27%
Taken Rate
44%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 20%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 150 150 63 120 96 84
Applied 0 0 0 5 24 12 0
Taken 19 0 6 5 24 12 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 8% 20% 13% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
120
Applied Rate
25%
Taken Rate
43%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 22%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 120 120 49 92 72 68
Applied 0 0 0 6 20 4 0
Taken 14 1 7 6 20 4 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 12% 22% 6% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
22%
Taken Rate
40%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 16%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 73 138 116 108
Applied 0 0 0 9 22 8 0
Taken 27 0 7 8 22 8 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 12% 16% 7% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
29%
Taken Rate
42%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 22%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 92 172 135 122
Applied 0 0 0 11 37 13 0
Taken 19 1 7 11 37 13 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 12% 22% 10% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
86%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 32%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 90 165 112 29
Applied 0 0 0 14 53 18 0
Taken 18 0 13 14 53 83 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 16% 32% 16% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
75%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 37%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 83 155 99 55
Applied 0 0 0 10 58 17 0
Taken 33 0 12 10 58 44 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 12% 37% 17% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
71%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 43%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 85 162 115 60
Applied 0 0 0 7 48 50 0
Taken 32 1 8 7 47 55 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 8% 30% 43% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
66%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 33%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 95 174 119 67
Applied 0 0 0 16 57 36 0
Taken 42 1 7 16 57 36 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 17% 33% 30% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Montfort Junior School, or share your own experience below.

"not bad enjoyed my 6 years in the school. Canteen food was gd but got food poisoning one time lol overall my class was great. mjs sports like badminton is very sigma i feel that the school itself is very skibidi. mr soh is my number 1 sigma Cher"

Nate Yap
Nate Yap

February 03, 2025

"From what I saw some boys were very rude on the bus they kept saying rude things to other primary school they should learn manners"

Neo Jason
Neo Jason

January 09, 2025

"I had the privilege of attending Montfort Primary School and graduated in 1991. Reflecting on my time there, I can confidently say that it was an amazing experience. The school was located at the Old Premises back then, and I have fond memories of the environment and the people who made my schooling years so special. The teachers, though strict, played a significant role in shaping who I am today. I’m incredibly grateful for the education and values imparted to me at Montfort Primary School. Thank you, Montfort, for everything! Age Quod Agis 🤩🙏"

Doctor Tristan Peh
Doctor Tristan Peh

September 01, 2024

"Overall experience is good. My boy made alot of friends, and is happy studying in school. I think the teachers make a difference. I hope my boy continue to be taught by good teachers."

Yanwu
Yanwu

February 12, 2024

"Good Teachers and staffs at MJS. They are doing a wonderful job in upbringing the boys. The lessons are made interesting for them. Teachers are very supportive. Communication plays a key role when children learn, so far I had the best experience with the form teachers and MT teachers. Keep it up!!"

Fairose Nachiya
Fairose Nachiya

May 23, 2023

Write A Review