Nan Hua Primary School, situated in the heart of Clementi, boasts an application rate of 170%, reflecting its high demand. Known for its rich heritage and commitment to holistic education, Nan Hua's popularity is underscored by 409 applications for just 241 placements.
The school has gained recognition for its strong Chinese language program, alongside notable achievements in Robotics and the Performing Arts. In recent news, Nan Hua Primary School has made strides in environmental education, winning the President's Award for the Environment.
As competition is steep, parents are encouraged to consider Nan Hua's robust academic and co-curricular programs alongside the application trends.
Nan Hua Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Phua Yin Lin Grace
Vice Principals:
Mr Lim Peng Yuan, Andy, Miss Teh Lay Choo Anne
Session Type:
Double Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Clementi MRT Station
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 180 | 61 | 21 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 119 | 102 | 40 | 166 | 0 | 0 | 427 | |
| % Applied | 66% | 167% | 190% | 405% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 119 | 61 | 21 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 66% | 100% | 100% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 180 | 73 | 20 | 40 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 108 | 102 | 39 | 160 | 0 | 0 | 409 | |
| % Applied | 60% | 140% | 195% | 400% | 0% | 0% | 170% | |
| Taken | 108 | 73 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 60% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 180 | 65 | 20 | 40 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 116 | 96 | 34 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 438 | |
| % Applied | 64% | 148% | 170% | 480% | 0% | 0% | 183% | |
| Taken | 116 | 65 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 64% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 77 | 20 | 40 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 104 | 111 | 38 | 191 | 0 | 0 | 444 | |
| % Applied | 58% | 144% | 190% | 478% | 0% | 0% | 185% | |
| Taken | 104 | 77 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 93 | 5 | 21 | 21 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 107 | 88 | 21 | 34 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 391 | |
| % Applied | 54% | 95% | 420% | 162% | 671% | 0% | 0% | 163% | |
| Taken | 107 | 88 | 5 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 77 | 240 | 20 | 22 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 123 | 84 | 0 | 19 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 341 | |
| % Applied | 62% | 109% | 0% | 95% | 523% | 0% | 0% | 142% | |
| Taken | 123 | 77 | 0 | 19 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 62% | 100% | 0% | 95% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 200 | 92 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 108 | 84 | 22 | 27 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 337 | |
| % Applied | 54% | 91% | 275% | 135% | 480% | 0% | 0% | 140% | |
| Taken | 108 | 84 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 91% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 23 | 32 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 103 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 70% | 272% | 0% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 112 | 51 | 31 | 14 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 21% | 13% | 61% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 20 | 26 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 75% | 362% | 0% | 0% | 45% | |
| Taken | 117 | 64 | 19 | 14 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 27% | 8% | 70% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 25 | 45 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 91 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 180% | 0% | 0% | 38% | |
| Taken | 108 | 48 | 34 | 5 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 20% | 14% | 20% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 20 | 21 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 81 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 135% | 257% | 0% | 0% | 34% | |
| Taken | 121 | 42 | 37 | 19 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 18% | 15% | 95% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 20 | 21 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 92 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 140% | 305% | 0% | 0% | 38% | |
| Taken | 117 | 41 | 42 | 19 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 17% | 18% | 95% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 15 | 15 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 102 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 200% | 480% | 0% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 133 | 27 | 50 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 11% | 21% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 16 | 16 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 98 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 219% | 394% | 0% | 0% | 41% | |
| Taken | 108 | 31 | 69 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 13% | 29% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 28 | 28 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 122 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 136% | 300% | 0% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 109 | 19 | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 8% | 23% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 36 | 35 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 124 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 111% | 240% | 0% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 102 | 20 | 47 | 36 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 8% | 20% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Nan Hua Primary School.
"Very nice place. Very clean and delicious canteen food. Love the history. Awesome teachers. Perfect facilities for various activities. Really recommend it!"
February 15, 2025
"This school is the best school in SG with high-quality facilities and much more. Recommend children coming here to get a premier education."
February 27, 2025
"Love the teachers. School facilities are very useful and toilets are very clean."
January 13, 2025
"@Judy Smith um so basically in case you did not know, we are participating in a global competition called Vocabulary Bowl on Vocab.com so we have to master as many words as we can"
February 14, 2025
"They confirm never teach how to cross road properly 👎"
January 14, 2025
"Nanhua is a nice school, but traffic is crazy"
July 29, 2022
"best school ever. dizigui kinda mid tho. be gep so u can skip dizigui."
April 28, 2025