Nan Hua Primary School

30 Jalan Lempeng, 128806

67788050

At a glance

Nan Hua Primary School, situated in the heart of Clementi, boasts an application rate of 170%, reflecting its high demand. Known for its rich heritage and commitment to holistic education, Nan Hua's popularity is underscored by 409 applications for just 241 placements.

School Type
Government-aided Sch
Session Type
Double Session
Nearest MRT
Clementi MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government-aided Sch Co-ed School Double Session sessions Nearest MRT: Clementi MRT Station SAP school GEP
Principal

Mdm Phua Yin Lin Grace

Vice Principals

Mr Lim Peng Yuan, Andy, Miss Teh Lay Choo Anne

Website

http://www.nanhuapri.moe.edu.sg

Email

nhps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
90% 116% 143% 169% 195% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 140% 100% 178% 101%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
178%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 405%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 61 21 41 0 0
Applied 119 102 40 166 0 0
Taken 119 61 21 41 0 0
Taken Rate 66% 167% 190% 405% - -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
170%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 400%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 73 20 40 240 240
Applied 108 102 39 160 0 0
Taken 108 73 20 40 0 0
Taken Rate 60% 140% 195% 400% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
183%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 480%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 65 20 40 240 240
Applied 116 96 34 192 0 0
Taken 116 65 20 40 0 0
Taken Rate 64% 148% 170% 480% 0% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
185%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 478%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 77 20 40 240 240
Applied 104 111 38 191 0 0
Taken 104 77 20 40 0 0
Taken Rate 58% 144% 190% 478% 0% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
163%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 671%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 93 5 21 21 240 240
Applied 107 88 21 34 141 0 0
Taken 107 88 5 21 21 0 0
Taken Rate 54% 95% 420% 162% 671% 0% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
142%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 523%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 77 240 20 22 240 240
Applied 123 84 0 19 115 0 0
Taken 123 77 0 19 22 0 0
Taken Rate 62% 109% 0% 95% 523% 0% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
140%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 480%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 92 8 20 20 240 240
Applied 108 84 22 27 96 0 0
Taken 108 84 8 20 20 0 0
Taken Rate 54% 91% 275% 135% 480% 0% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
43%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 272%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 23 32 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 16 87 0 0
Taken 112 51 31 14 32 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 70% 272% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
45%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 362%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 20 26 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 15 94 0 0
Taken 117 64 19 14 26 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 75% 362% 0% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
38%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 180%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 25 45 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 10 81 0 0
Taken 108 48 34 5 45 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 40% 180% 0% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
34%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 257%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 20 21 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 27 54 0 0
Taken 121 42 37 19 21 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 135% 257% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
38%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 305%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 20 21 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 28 64 0 0
Taken 117 41 42 19 21 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 140% 305% 0% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
43%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 480%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 15 15 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 30 72 0 0
Taken 133 27 50 15 15 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 200% 480% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 394%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 16 16 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 35 63 0 0
Taken 108 31 69 16 16 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 219% 394% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
51%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 300%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 28 28 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 38 84 0 0
Taken 109 19 56 28 28 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 136% 300% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 240%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 36 35 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 40 84 0 0
Taken 102 20 47 36 35 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 111% 240% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Nan Hua Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"best school ever. dizigui kinda mid tho. be gep so u can skip dizigui."

Mei Linshu (Nhps)
Mei Linshu (Nhps)

April 28, 2025

"This school is the best school in SG with high-quality facilities and much more. Recommend children coming here to get a premier education."

juiceboxx
juiceboxx

February 27, 2025

"Very nice place. Very clean and delicious canteen food. Love the history. Awesome teachers. Perfect facilities for various activities. Really recommend it!"

Wang Qianze
Wang Qianze

February 15, 2025

"@Judy Smith um so basically in case you did not know, we are participating in a global competition called Vocabulary Bowl on Vocab.com so we have to master as many words as we can"

Song William (Nhps)
Song William (Nhps)

February 14, 2025

"They confirm never teach how to cross road properly 👎"

Linus Kwek
Linus Kwek

January 14, 2025

"Love the teachers. School facilities are very useful and toilets are very clean."

tessa
tessa

January 13, 2025

"Nanhua is a nice school, but traffic is crazy"

SL M
SL M

July 29, 2022

Write A Review