Set in the heart of Singapore, North View Primary School is renowned for its stellar academic achievements and all-round development programs. With an application rate of 122%, calculated from 295 applications and 241 placements, this school is highly sought-after, indicating its competitive nature.
North View Primary School prides itself on its engaging STEM programs, promoting innovation and critical thinking. The school's recent laurels in local academic competitions further highlight its academic prowess.
For parents seeking comprehensive growth and excellent education for their child, North View Primary School is an ideal choice.
North View Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Lee Lie Kian Grace
Vice Principals:
Mr Rajinder Singh s/o Piara Singh, Ms Ling Sook Leng
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Yishun Khatib
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 180 | 71 | 20 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 109 | 74 | 1 | 109 | 0 | 0 | 293 | |
| % Applied | 61% | 104% | 5% | 182% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 109 | 71 | 1 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 61% | 100% | 5% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 180 | 75 | 20 | 61 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 105 | 81 | 0 | 109 | 0 | 0 | 295 | |
| % Applied | 58% | 108% | 0% | 179% | 0% | 0% | 123% | |
| Taken | 105 | 75 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 180 | 87 | 26 | 80 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 93 | 68 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 256 | |
| % Applied | 52% | 78% | 0% | 119% | 0% | 0% | 107% | |
| Taken | 93 | 68 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 78% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 99 | 48 | 144 | 26 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 81 | 15 | 0 | 119 | 58 | 0 | 273 | |
| % Applied | 45% | 15% | 0% | 83% | 223% | 0% | 114% | |
| Taken | 81 | 15 | 0 | 119 | 26 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 15% | 0% | 83% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 122 | 121 | 73 | 147 | 43 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 78 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 104 | 87 | 0 | 285 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 1% | 12% | 0% | 71% | 202% | 0% | 119% | |
| Taken | 78 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 104 | 43 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 1% | 12% | 0% | 71% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 180 | 93 | 93 | 59 | 117 | 15 | 220 | 220 |
| Applied | 87 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 102 | 34 | 0 | 239 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 0% | 16% | 2% | 87% | 227% | 0% | 109% | |
| Taken | 87 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 102 | 15 | 0 | 220 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 0% | 16% | 2% | 87% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 60 | 60 | 44 | 87 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 80 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 184 | |
| % Applied | 57% | 0% | 22% | 2% | 103% | 0% | 0% | 102% | |
| Taken | 80 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 57% | 0% | 22% | 2% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 42 | 82 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 101 | 0 | 0 | 102 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 123% | 0% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 87 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 0% | 6% | 2% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 54 | 107 | 19 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 89 | 35 | 0 | 126 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 83% | 184% | 0% | 70% | |
| Taken | 68 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 88 | 19 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 2% | 2% | 82% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 52 | 103 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 106 | 0 | 0 | 106 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 103% | 0% | 0% | 59% | |
| Taken | 70 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 103 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 55 | 109 | 7 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 103 | 13 | 0 | 116 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 95% | 186% | 0% | 64% | |
| Taken | 64 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 102 | 7 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 94% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 61 | 121 | 13 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108 | 15 | 0 | 123 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 89% | 115% | 0% | 68% | |
| Taken | 53 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 108 | 13 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 89% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 56 | 112 | 1 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 111 | 2 | 0 | 113 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 99% | 200% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 57 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 111 | 1 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 99% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 63 | 126 | 34 | 13 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | 20 | 0 | 112 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 73% | 59% | 0% | 62% | |
| Taken | 48 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 92 | 21 | 0 | 167 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 73% | 62% | 0% | 93% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 61 | 120 | 51 | 31 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 69 | 17 | 0 | 88 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 58% | 33% | 0% | 49% | |
| Taken | 54 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 69 | 20 | 0 | 149 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 3% | 2% | 58% | 39% | 0% | 83% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 57 | 113 | 48 | 33 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 13 | 0 | 79 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 58% | 27% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 60 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 65 | 13 | 0 | 145 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 58% | 27% | 0% | 81% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with North View Primary School.
"Can be better if they can have more cca like band ,chinese orchestra, mass communication club or debating club ! CCA choice is limited"
January 16, 2025
"The security guards & school attendants "see people" to greet every morning."
March 28, 2025
"Best school for time being under upgrades and used for people moeslim to do Friday prayer - thanks 🙏👍"
June 04, 2023
"ms lim is horrid! They didn't bat an eye to my complaint do not come here!"
February 06, 2025
"BEST SCHOOL FR !! I graduated last year from this school and this school really is amazing. all the teachers are nice and good! even though this school might be overlooked at with huamin primary, navalbase primary or all sorts of primary schools in yishun, it's excellent in its own way !! discipline is extremely good as well !!"
February 09, 2024
"According to 2024 Balloting Exercise it is the 3rd popular school in Yishun.Definitely Great school to nuture kids here if your are looking a good school for your kids to build great character ,studiousness yet creativity,with responsiblity.They embraced every individual. The Chinese teachers here put in a lot effort and care for weaker students.The traffic control and planning and security guards are strict and orderly .They ensure safety first !"
April 30, 2025