Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary School

7 PEI WAH AVENUE , 597610

64663787

At a glance

Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary School, a government-aided institution, is renowned for its SAP heritage and robust Chinese language programme. As a co-educational, single-session school, it offers a plethora of co-curricular activities aimed at holistic child development.

School Type
Government-aided Sch
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Beauty World
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government-aided Sch Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Beauty World SAP school
Estimated demand near this school: Very High
Very High

Directional estimate grouped by latest MOE ballot pressure, recent applied-rate trend, local child-population proxy, and nearby vacancies.

Demand signals snapshot
Show details Hide details
SingStat is an area population proxy, not the number of children registering for this school. The one-year cohort estimate divides the age 5 to 9 count by 5.
Latest MOE ballot signal
Year
2025
Segment
SC within 1km
Phases balloted
2A, 2B, 2C
Latest applied rate
224%
Local child pool
SingStat age 5 to 9
1,080
Estimated 1-year cohort
216
Area
Anak Bukit (subzone)
Area share
4.9%
Nearby capacity
Nearby vacancies (2km)
614
Capacity context
About 2.8 vacancies per estimated local child
MOE balloted SC within 1km in 2025 in phases 2A, 2B, 2C.
Principal

MRS ALLISON LIM

Vice Principals

MADAM YONG MING WOEI CHLOE, MISS SARAH CHIA HUI'E

Website

http://www.peihwapresbyterianpri.moe.edu.sg/

Email

phpps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 132% 100% 163% 100% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 132% 100% 163% 100%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. When MOE marks a phase for balloting, the school was oversubscribed for that phase.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
224
Applied Rate
163%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Balloting
Yes
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S)
Vacancies 164 53 20 41 0
Applied 111 120 51 84 0
Taken 111 53 20 41 0
Taken Rate 68% 226% 255% 205% -
Balloting - Yes Yes Yes -
Vacancies for ballot - 53 20 41 -
Balloting applicants - 56 35 69 -
Balloted group - SC within 1km SC within 1km SC within 1km -
MOE balloting notes

MOE ballots only when applicants exceed remaining vacancies. The table above shows the phase counts and whether SC or PR had to ballot for each phase.

Highest demand: 2B at 255%
Show details Hide details
2A · SC within 1km
Balloted group (SC/PR)

Singapore Citizen children residing within 1km of the school.

2B · SC within 1km
Balloted group (SC/PR)

Singapore Citizen children residing within 1km of the school.

2C · SC within 1km
Balloted group (SC/PR)

Singapore Citizen children residing within 1km of the school.

2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
224
Applied Rate
136%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2A
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 164 75 20 41 224 224
Applied 89 127 22 66 0 0
Taken 89 75 20 41 0 0
Taken Rate 54% 169% 110% 161% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
224
Applied Rate
135%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 164 62 20 40 224 224
Applied 102 93 32 75 0 0
Taken 102 62 20 40 0 0
Taken Rate 62% 150% 160% 188% 0% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
224
Applied Rate
159%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2A
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 164 44 20 41 224 224
Applied 121 112 37 87 0 0
Taken 121 44 20 41 0 0
Taken Rate 74% 255% 185% 212% 0% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. When MOE marks a phase for balloting, the school was oversubscribed for that phase.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
224
Applied Rate
126%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 184 71 224 21 21 224 224
Applied 113 86 0 31 53 0 0
Taken 113 71 0 21 21 0 0
Taken Rate 61% 121% 0% 148% 252% 0% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
224
Applied Rate
125%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 184 67 224 20 21 224 224
Applied 118 69 0 29 63 0 0
Taken 118 67 0 20 21 0 0
Taken Rate 64% 103% 0% 145% 300% 0% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
224
Applied Rate
132%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 184 68 24 20 21 224 224
Applied 116 44 44 41 51 0 0
Taken 116 44 24 20 21 0 0
Taken Rate 63% 65% 183% 205% 243% 0% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
31%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 22 27 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 36 47 0 0
Taken 128 28 71 16 27 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 164% 174% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 39 45 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 49 62 0 0
Taken 121 0 71 33 45 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 126% 138% 0% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
34%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 33 41 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 47 44 0 0
Taken 130 0 75 24 41 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 142% 107% 0% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
300
Applied Rate
39%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 300 300 300 50 56 300 300
Applied 0 0 0 48 69 0 0
Taken 134 0 66 44 56 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 96% 123% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
300
Applied Rate
31%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 300 300 300 40 40 300 300
Applied 0 0 0 41 52 0 0
Taken 144 0 76 40 40 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 103% 130% 0% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
300
Applied Rate
35%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 300 300 300 34 33 300 300
Applied 0 0 0 52 54 0 0
Taken 144 1 88 34 33 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 153% 164% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
300
Applied Rate
27%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 300 300 300 28 27 300 300
Applied 0 0 0 40 42 0 0
Taken 174 0 71 28 27 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 143% 156% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
300
Applied Rate
43%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 300 300 300 44 43 300 300
Applied 0 0 0 70 58 0 0
Taken 158 1 54 44 43 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 159% 135% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
330
Applied Rate
41%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2B
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 330 330 330 44 44 330 330
Applied 0 0 0 68 67 0 0
Taken 173 0 69 44 44 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 155% 152% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Pei Hwa Presbyterian Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"Not even good they are racist even though me Chinese is better and even one of the top. Even though I’m darker in skin both teachers and classmates are racist if your darker skin, here’s not the place"

Henry Ruan
Henry Ruan

April 19, 2025

"Me and my sister are both studying there, very good school( why are y’all posting one star cos of the vp? This is about the school, not the vp)"

Li
Li

January 16, 2025

"Pei hwa Presbyterian primary school is a very good school , they students there show respect and the teachers are very friendly and willing to teach , I was a student there and one of the best teachers are probably Mr Idris chua and Mr John Leung they teach me step by step until I understand ,you can even ask them to repeat a lot of times if you don't understand, the toilets are very clean and please come to this school ,is indeed a excellent school"

Huang Wei Qi
Huang Wei Qi

November 26, 2024

"For the aspiring keyboard warriors, let's not post any further comments regarding the incident. The 1 star review comments are NOT fair to the school, NOT fair to the staff & NOT fair to the students as they are all innocent parties. The staff involved has permanently left the school & MOE. End of story. Let's be positive & encourage one another. The incident has not harmed anyone except for the families involved. So let's be kind 😊 RE: I am just a normal Singaporean, not affiliated to the school in any way, but just annoyed & kaypoh."

P L
P L

October 21, 2024

"The scandalous vp who did something bad- when talking to parent during feedback will start by asking you for you and your spouse profession before he decide to talk to you further. If u r influential he won't pretend not to hear you by standing there and waiting for you to leave."

Cuki Buay
Cuki Buay

October 20, 2024

"Walked past this school while passing by the shell station. The building has been rebuilt since many many years ago. Looks alot bigger and more grand now."

Ming Hui
Ming Hui

March 28, 2024

Write A Review