Peiying Primary School, located in the heart of Yishun, has a robust application rate of 120%, calculated from the 228 applications it received for only 190 available slots. This competitive environment is a testament to the school's commitment to academic excellence, seen in its recent achievement of the MOE's School Distinction Award.
Peiying's diverse curriculum, including a thriving STEM program and an exceptional arts and music enrichment, further enhances its appeal. The school's high application rate reflects its popularity amongst Singaporean parents seeking an enriching Primary 1 experience for their children.
Start your child's journey with Peiying, where learning is a joyful adventure.
Peiying Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Wong Wei Yong
Vice Principals:
Mr Abdul Rani Bin Idris, Ms Ng Pei Sun
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Khatib
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 140 | 66 | 35 | 105 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 74 | 21 | 0 | 53 | 67 | 0 | 215 | |
| % Applied | 53% | 32% | 0% | 50% | 129% | - | - | |
| Taken | 74 | 21 | 0 | 53 | 52 | 0 | 200 | |
| % Taken | 53% | 32% | 0% | 50% | 100% | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 130 | 54 | 33 | 99 | 51 | 190 | 190 |
| Applied | 76 | 15 | 0 | 48 | 89 | 0 | 228 | |
| % Applied | 58% | 28% | 0% | 48% | 175% | 0% | 120% | |
| Taken | 76 | 15 | 0 | 48 | 51 | 0 | 190 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 28% | 0% | 48% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 160 | 90 | 40 | 121 | 73 | 220 | 220 |
| Applied | 70 | 29 | 0 | 49 | 105 | 0 | 253 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 32% | 0% | 41% | 144% | 0% | 115% | |
| Taken | 70 | 29 | 0 | 49 | 73 | 0 | 221 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 32% | 0% | 41% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 130 | 64 | 36 | 107 | 62 | 190 | 190 |
| Applied | 66 | 17 | 0 | 45 | 82 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 27% | 0% | 42% | 132% | 0% | 111% | |
| Taken | 66 | 17 | 0 | 45 | 62 | 0 | 190 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 27% | 0% | 42% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 180 | 104 | 104 | 63 | 126 | 84 | 220 | 220 |
| Applied | 76 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 44 | 93 | 0 | 231 | |
| % Applied | 42% | 0% | 17% | 0% | 35% | 111% | 0% | 105% | |
| Taken | 76 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 44 | 84 | 0 | 222 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 0% | 17% | 0% | 35% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 150 | 69 | 69 | 47 | 93 | 49 | 4 | 190 |
| Applied | 81 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 44 | 45 | 0 | 186 | |
| % Applied | 54% | 0% | 23% | 0% | 47% | 92% | 0% | 98% | |
| Taken | 81 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 44 | 45 | 0 | 186 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 0% | 23% | 0% | 47% | 92% | 0% | 98% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 84 | 84 | 58 | 115 | 74 | 18 | 180 |
| Applied | 56 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 41 | 56 | 0 | 163 | |
| % Applied | 40% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 36% | 76% | 0% | 91% | |
| Taken | 56 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 41 | 56 | 0 | 163 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 36% | 76% | 0% | 91% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 71 | 141 | 95 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 46 | 105 | 0 | 152 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 33% | 111% | 0% | 72% | |
| Taken | 52 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 46 | 95 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 25% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 56 | 112 | 62 | 22 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 40 | 0 | 90 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 65% | 0% | 50% | |
| Taken | 53 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 50 | 40 | 0 | 159 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 45% | 65% | 0% | 88% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 56 | 113 | 61 | 33 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 28 | 0 | 80 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 46% | 46% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 55 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 52 | 28 | 0 | 149 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 46% | 46% | 0% | 83% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 52 | 105 | 55 | 30 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 25 | 0 | 75 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 48% | 45% | 0% | 42% | |
| Taken | 61 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 50 | 25 | 0 | 151 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 48% | 45% | 0% | 84% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 53 | 107 | 39 | 6 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 33 | 0 | 101 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 64% | 85% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 58 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 174 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 63% | 85% | 0% | 97% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 64 | 127 | 62 | 36 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 20 | 0 | 85 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 51% | 32% | 0% | 47% | |
| Taken | 49 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 65 | 26 | 0 | 144 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 51% | 42% | 0% | 80% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 56 | 111 | 27 | 9 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 85 | 18 | 0 | 104 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 77% | 67% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 58 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 85 | 18 | 0 | 172 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 0% | 6% | 2% | 77% | 67% | 0% | 96% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 57 | 112 | 44 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 68 | 40 | 0 | 110 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 61% | 91% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 56 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 68 | 44 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 1% | 5% | 4% | 61% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 56 | 111 | 45 | 9 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 100 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 60% | 73% | 0% | 56% | |
| Taken | 62 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 169 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 60% | 73% | 0% | 94% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Peiying Primary School.
"this school best i love spicy noodle there. only problem is teachers vv scrict always scold me"
November 20, 2024
"My twins have been in PYPS for the past 5 years. The teachers are all very caring and encouraging. They have a holistic academic and CCAs. Weaker students are highly supported through the different programmes and remedial. The school also conducts many outside of the classroom activities for them for an enriching school life. Maybe some improvements might be their water cooler could include room temperature water and classrooms can be cleaner. ☺️ Overall I highly recommend children to come to this school."
May 26, 2024
"My real schooling experience...... thanks to all my teachers and friends!!"
December 25, 2021
"I have been to this school and its a really good school i love it and i was a student there last year the teachers are very nice"
July 22, 2023
"I was a student of this school and graduated in 2016. Though like every school in which you'd get stressed out on things, this school gave me a lot of opportunities to try. The teachers there are just wonderful. Firm yet very helpful and caring!"
January 31, 2018
"hi guys ! i jsut graduated from this school and tbh? i miss it so much every time my mind wanders back here! The teachers are amazing shout out to my p6s one mdm haniza , mrs teo , mr chia and ofc miss hee who was my higher chinese teacher and she taught me so much to live laugh learn chinese tysm ! i want to go back and visit . also their food is so nice especially the mac and cheese and everything the facilities and everything i never treasured them but now i miss them . Also mr matthew best pe teacher hands downn and to all p6s this yr i wish yall best of luck and treasure ur time there!"
April 26, 2025
"It was good but as a student there, I feel like the teachers should let us to the toilet more often:) Also I like the personality of the students there"
April 11, 2025
"It was a very good school when I was a student. At the time I thought I didn't like it but looking back, it was very good."
April 13, 2025