Peiying Primary School

651 YISHUN RING ROAD, 768687

62575684

At a glance

Peiying Primary School, located in the heart of Yishun, has a robust application rate of 120%, calculated from the 228 applications it received for only 190 available slots. This competitive environment is a testament to the school's commitment to academic excellence, seen in its recent achievement of the MOE's School Distinction Award.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Khatib
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Khatib
Principal

Mdm Wong Wei Yong

Vice Principals

Mr Abdul Rani Bin Idris, Ms Ng Pei Sun

Website

http://www.peiyingpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

peiying_ps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
85% 95% 105% 115% 125% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 91% 91% 108% 100%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
108%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 129%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 66 35 105 52 0
Applied 74 21 0 53 67 0
Taken 74 21 0 53 52 0
Taken Rate 53% 32% 0% 50% 129% -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
120%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 175%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 130 54 33 99 51 190
Applied 76 15 0 48 89 0
Taken 76 15 0 48 51 0
Taken Rate 58% 28% 0% 48% 175% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
115%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 144%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 90 40 121 73 220
Applied 70 29 0 49 105 0
Taken 70 29 0 49 73 0
Taken Rate 44% 32% 0% 40% 144% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
111%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 132%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 130 64 36 107 62 190
Applied 66 17 0 45 82 0
Taken 66 17 0 45 62 0
Taken Rate 51% 27% 0% 42% 132% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
220
Applied Rate
105%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 111%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 104 104 63 126 84 220
Applied 76 0 18 0 44 93 0
Taken 76 0 18 0 44 84 0
Taken Rate 42% 0% 17% 0% 35% 111% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
190
Applied Rate
98%
Taken Rate
98%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 92%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 150 69 69 47 93 49 4
Applied 81 0 16 0 44 45 0
Taken 81 0 16 0 44 45 0
Taken Rate 54% 0% 23% 0% 47% 92% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
91%
Taken Rate
91%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 76%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 84 84 58 115 74 18
Applied 56 0 10 0 41 56 0
Taken 56 0 10 0 41 56 0
Taken Rate 40% 0% 12% 0% 36% 76% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
72%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 111%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 71 141 95 210
Applied 0 0 0 1 46 105 0
Taken 52 0 17 0 46 95 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 33% 111% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
88%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 65%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 56 112 62 22
Applied 0 0 0 0 50 40 0
Taken 53 0 16 0 50 40 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 45% 65% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
44%
Taken Rate
83%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 46%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 56 113 61 33
Applied 0 0 0 0 52 28 0
Taken 55 0 14 0 52 28 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 46% 46% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
42%
Taken Rate
84%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 48%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 52 105 55 30
Applied 0 0 0 0 50 25 0
Taken 61 0 15 0 50 25 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 48% 45% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
56%
Taken Rate
97%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 85%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 53 107 39 6
Applied 0 0 0 0 68 33 0
Taken 58 0 16 0 67 33 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 64% 85% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
47%
Taken Rate
80%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 51%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 64 127 62 36
Applied 0 0 0 0 65 20 0
Taken 49 0 4 0 65 26 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 51% 32% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
58%
Taken Rate
96%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 77%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 56 111 27 9
Applied 0 0 0 1 85 18 0
Taken 58 0 10 1 85 18 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 77% 67% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
61%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 91%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 57 112 44 180
Applied 0 0 0 2 68 40 0
Taken 56 1 9 2 68 44 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 4% 61% 91% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
56%
Taken Rate
94%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 73%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 180 180 56 111 45 9
Applied 0 0 0 0 67 33 0
Taken 62 0 7 0 67 33 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 60% 73% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Peiying Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"hi guys ! i jsut graduated from this school and tbh? i miss it so much every time my mind wanders back here! The teachers are amazing shout out to my p6s one mdm haniza , mrs teo , mr chia and ofc miss hee who was my higher chinese teacher and she taught me so much to live laugh learn chinese tysm ! i want to go back and visit . also their food is so nice especially the mac and cheese and everything the facilities and everything i never treasured them but now i miss them . Also mr matthew best pe teacher hands downn and to all p6s this yr i wish yall best of luck and treasure ur time there!"

Jungeun
Jungeun

April 26, 2025

"It was a very good school when I was a student. At the time I thought I didn't like it but looking back, it was very good."

Sulimir Majewski
Sulimir Majewski

April 13, 2025

"It was good but as a student there, I feel like the teachers should let us to the toilet more often:) Also I like the personality of the students there"

Lok
Lok

April 11, 2025

"this school best i love spicy noodle there. only problem is teachers vv scrict always scold me"

majestic ballsack
majestic ballsack

November 20, 2024

"My twins have been in PYPS for the past 5 years. The teachers are all very caring and encouraging. They have a holistic academic and CCAs. Weaker students are highly supported through the different programmes and remedial. The school also conducts many outside of the classroom activities for them for an enriching school life. Maybe some improvements might be their water cooler could include room temperature water and classrooms can be cleaner. ☺️ Overall I highly recommend children to come to this school."

F G
F G

May 26, 2024

"I have been to this school and its a really good school i love it and i was a student there last year the teachers are very nice"

Eloise Oh
Eloise Oh

July 22, 2023

"My real schooling experience...... thanks to all my teachers and friends!!"

Xuan Kumar
Xuan Kumar

December 25, 2021

"I was a student of this school and graduated in 2016. Though like every school in which you'd get stressed out on things, this school gave me a lot of opportunities to try. The teachers there are just wonderful. Firm yet very helpful and caring!"

Akmal Razali
Akmal Razali

January 31, 2018

Write A Review