Princess Elizabeth Primary School

30 BUKIT BATOK WEST AVENUE 3, 659163

65655111

At a glance

Princess Elizabeth Primary School, with an application rate of 263%, is a highly competitive choice for Singaporean parents. It's renowned for its exceptional achievements, including being a consistent performer in the National Primary School Track and Field Championships.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Bukit Batok MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Bukit Batok MRT Station
Principal

Mr Bucktha Seelan

Vice Principals

Ms Ngiam Wee Heng, Ms Chu Sing Ee

Website

http://www.princesselizabethpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

peps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
80% 131% 183% 234% 285% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 163% 101% 247% 101%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
247%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 566%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 52 20 41 0 0
Applied 88 145 28 232 0 0
Taken 88 52 20 41 0 0
Taken Rate 63% 279% 140% 566% - -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
265%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 659%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 45 20 41 200 200
Applied 95 142 22 270 0 0
Taken 95 45 20 41 0 0
Taken Rate 68% 316% 110% 659% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
236%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 590%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 53 20 48 200 200
Applied 87 89 12 283 0 0
Taken 87 53 12 48 0 0
Taken Rate 62% 168% 60% 590% 0% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
221%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 505%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 42 20 55 200 200
Applied 98 60 5 278 0 0
Taken 98 42 5 55 0 0
Taken Rate 70% 143% 25% 505% 0% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
196%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 524%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 68 55 26 45 200 200
Applied 92 13 44 7 236 0 0
Taken 92 13 44 7 45 0 0
Taken Rate 58% 19% 80% 27% 524% 0% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
199%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 595%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 40 40 20 38 200 200
Applied 120 0 50 2 226 0 0
Taken 120 0 40 2 38 0 0
Taken Rate 75% 0% 125% 10% 595% 0% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
200
Applied Rate
163%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 250%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 160 92 92 40 82 200 200
Applied 68 0 52 0 205 0 0
Taken 68 0 52 0 82 0 0
Taken Rate 43% 0% 57% 0% 250% 0% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
78%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 240%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 34 68 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 1 163 0 0
Taken 96 0 47 0 68 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 240% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
55%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 161%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 36 71 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 2 114 0 0
Taken 84 0 55 0 71 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 6% 161% 0% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
52%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 121%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 44 91 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 0 110 0 0
Taken 85 0 37 0 91 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 121% 0% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
43%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 107%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 48 96 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 1 103 0 0
Taken 97 0 48 0 96 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 107% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
48%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 126%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 46 92 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 0 116 0 0
Taken 107 2 39 0 92 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 126% 0% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
55%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 118%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 57 107 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 7 126 0 0
Taken 85 0 41 7 107 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 12% 118% 0% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
65%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 123%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 64 124 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 3 153 0 0
Taken 79 0 34 3 124 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 5% 123% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
58%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 221%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 28 53 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 5 117 0 0
Taken 115 0 39 5 53 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 18% 221% 0% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
67%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 383%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 19 36 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 3 138 0 0
Taken 128 0 43 3 36 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 16% 383% 0% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Princess Elizabeth Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"I have been in PEPS for 5 years and I can tell that their education for students are excellent. They bring us on field trips to the Indian heritage (example) and have lots of amazing activities during class! We can go to the computer lab to take the chromebooks ( laptops) and learn from slide -shows! So therefore, I have to rate the school 5 stars"

Cheryl Yap Jia Hui (Peps)
Cheryl Yap Jia Hui (Peps)

December 17, 2024

"P5(2025) in this school 3 star the teachers are a mix of good and bad students is ok lah but the school level 4 toliet is very smelly overall:3 star mid/good school"

JayD Yeo
JayD Yeo

December 14, 2024

"One of the best school in bukit batok. The school used to be very interesting in the late 90s. Many students playing balls, badminton and catching spiders. Physical fitness corner was one of the best place to hang out during recess and before assembly. Some students got injured when they were exercising, playing catching and etc. Some students tend to misplace their school bags because of their actvities. TAF club can be fun and boring. There were bad and good teachers in the school. This is the history of PEPS. I believes that you can't experience this anymore in the current era (2020s). Wish peps good luck..."

FisherxMan_88
FisherxMan_88

August 14, 2024

"The toilet is top notch mdm halimah leave but idc she was the best principal🙏🙏💯💯💯💯🤤🤤🤤🤤💀💀💀💀 and also i didn't have to use my gun when I was getting bullied🤩🤩🤩"

Pepe Pepe
Pepe Pepe

June 20, 2023

"Princess Elizabeth Primary School 伊丽莎白公主小学 Nice name. Little girl will love it. Obviously not the boy. Last update/ review Feb2017"

HS Lim
HS Lim

February 27, 2017

Write A Review