Punggol Green Primary School

98 Punggol Walk, 828772

65383011

At a glance

Punggol Green Primary School, nestled in the heart of Punggol, boasts an application rate of 124%, drawn from its 298 applicants vying for 241 slots. Known for its robust education, the school's achievements include outstanding performance in national examinations and a thriving co-curricular program.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Punggol MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Punggol MRT Station
Principal

Mr Hanafi B Asmore

Vice Principals

Mr Jasbir Singh s/o Dharam Singh, Mdm Tay Chai Hong

Website

http://www.punggolgreenpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

admin_punggolgreen_ps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
95% 109% 123% 136% 150% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 140% 102% 131% 100%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
131%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 203%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 63 20 58 0 0
Applied 117 76 3 118 0 0
Taken 117 63 3 58 0 0
Taken Rate 65% 121% 15% 203% - -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
124%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 183%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 70 20 59 240 240
Applied 111 78 1 108 0 0
Taken 111 70 1 59 0 0
Taken Rate 62% 111% 5% 183% 0% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
133%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 190%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 73 21 58 240 240
Applied 107 98 4 110 0 0
Taken 107 73 4 58 0 0
Taken Rate 59% 134% 19% 190% 0% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
250
Applied Rate
141%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 227%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 190 68 20 56 250 250
Applied 122 99 4 127 0 0
Taken 122 68 4 56 0 0
Taken Rate 64% 146% 20% 227% 0% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
250
Applied Rate
126%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 262%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 92 92 20 37 250 250
Applied 118 0 96 3 97 0 0
Taken 118 0 92 3 37 0 0
Taken Rate 56% 0% 104% 15% 262% 0% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
280
Applied Rate
129%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 234%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 98 98 30 59 280 280
Applied 142 0 78 3 138 0 0
Taken 142 0 78 3 59 0 0
Taken Rate 59% 0% 80% 10% 234% 0% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
250
Applied Rate
140%
Taken Rate
102%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 288%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 74 74 25 51 250 250
Applied 136 0 64 3 147 0 0
Taken 136 0 64 3 51 0 0
Taken Rate 65% 0% 86% 12% 288% 0% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
320
Applied Rate
77%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 213%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 320 320 320 58 114 320 320
Applied 0 0 0 2 243 0 0
Taken 137 0 67 2 114 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 213% 0% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
98%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 157%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 84 167 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 2 263 0 0
Taken 103 0 0 0 167 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 157% 0% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
108%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 168%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 78 154 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 1 258 0 0
Taken 83 1 1 1 154 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 168% 0% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
97%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 127%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 92 183 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 0 233 0 0
Taken 55 0 2 0 183 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 127% 0% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
300
Applied Rate
91%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 100%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 300 300 300 136 271 86 300
Applied 0 0 0 1 185 86 0
Taken 28 0 0 1 185 86 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 68% 100% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
64%
Taken Rate
85%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 44%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 117 234 132 37
Applied 0 0 0 0 103 51 0
Taken 6 0 0 0 103 95 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 44% 39% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
23%
Taken Rate
90%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 18%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 105 209 172 20
Applied 0 0 0 1 37 10 0
Taken 0 0 0 1 37 152 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 1% 18% 6% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Punggol Green Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"School is filled with activities to enrich our children's learning! Met many teachers who are supportive, understanding and patient! A great place for our kids to grow and learn! Am very blessed to have my children studying in this school 😊"

Vivien Po
Vivien Po

April 15, 2025

"Students were rude and disrespectful outside of school. Called people rude words"

Mishel
Mishel

February 16, 2025

"The teacher and staff are all very nice and all the environment is comfortable to me"

ayyathebee
ayyathebee

November 13, 2024

"In the 6 years I've studied here the teachers were always super nice (albeit a bit fierce when you didn't hand in homework) and the activities were always through the roof in terms of quality. Only bad thing I have to say is WHY DID THEY REBUILD EVERYTHING AFTER I GRADUATED??? but other than that this sch is amazing. 10/10 would recommend"

Zeph Ren
Zeph Ren

July 10, 2024

"I’m currently studying there this year(2024), and I have to say, the school has put in their best efforts to create a visually and accessible learning environments and accessories to give it our best not only in academics, but in peer support, sports, leadership and etc. But the thing is, I don’t like to go to school as it is my psle year and I’m too stressed out with work and stuff. But I’m sure I’ll be able to pull through! Hope the following P6 batches don’t feel the same way! Well done PGPS, continue this fun and caring attitude 🩷"

Rashaad Nasif
Rashaad Nasif

July 02, 2024

"The school’s facilities are the best! Teachers here are very kind too, it’s just some teachers, in my 6 years, I only met a few bad teachers other than that, my experience here was amazing!! I love the events that the school holds every year and the food too!!"

jiahui
jiahui

January 01, 2024

Write A Review