Qihua Primary School

5 WOODLANDS STREET 81, 738525

62696250

At a glance

Qihua Primary School, nestled in Woodlands, is a popular choice among parents with a 100% application rate. The school is known for its outstanding achievements in both academics and co-curricular activities, making it highly competitive.

School Type
Government School
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Woodlands MRT Station
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government School Co-ed School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Woodlands MRT Station
Principal

Mrs Lee Hui Feng

Vice Principals

Mr Foo Chuan Kai, Ms Nurul Suhana Binte Sulaiman

Website

http://www.qihuapri.moe.edu.sg

Email

qihua_ps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
50% 65% 80% 95% 110% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 102% 101% 67% 67%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
67%
Taken Rate
67%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 46%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 69 37 112 61 60
Applied 51 17 0 52 1 0
Taken 51 17 0 52 1 0
Taken Rate 43% 25% 0% 46% 2% 0%
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
57%
Taken Rate
57%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 43%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 69 38 116 86 80
Applied 51 15 1 30 6 0
Taken 51 15 1 30 6 0
Taken Rate 43% 22% 3% 26% 7% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
74%
Taken Rate
74%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 50%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 120 60 32 95 53 47
Applied 60 25 0 42 6 0
Taken 60 25 0 42 6 0
Taken Rate 50% 42% 0% 44% 11% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
64%
Taken Rate
64%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 35%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 121 54 158 102 88
Applied 59 19 5 56 14 0
Taken 59 19 5 56 14 0
Taken Rate 33% 16% 9% 35% 14% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
70%
Taken Rate
70%
Highest Demand
Phase 1
Highest demand: Phase 1 at 40%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 121 120 69 137 85 73
Applied 79 1 23 0 52 12 0
Taken 79 1 23 0 52 12 0
Taken Rate 40% 1% 19% 0% 38% 14% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
81%
Taken Rate
81%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 52%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 113 112 69 133 65 40
Applied 57 1 15 4 69 25 0
Taken 57 1 15 4 69 25 0
Taken Rate 34% 1% 13% 6% 52% 38% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
180
Applied Rate
102%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 107%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 140 72 72 48 95 28 180
Applied 68 1 17 0 67 30 0
Taken 68 1 17 0 67 28 0
Taken Rate 49% 1% 24% 0% 71% 107% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
40%
Taken Rate
71%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 40%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 83 167 100 71
Applied 0 0 0 0 67 29 0
Taken 58 0 16 0 67 29 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 40% 29% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
34%
Taken Rate
72%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 45%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 64 128 73 58
Applied 0 0 0 0 57 15 0
Taken 73 0 9 0 55 15 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 45% 21% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
26%
Taken Rate
64%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 36%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 210 210 210 65 130 83 76
Applied 0 0 0 0 47 7 0
Taken 64 0 16 0 47 7 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 36% 8% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
32%
Taken Rate
78%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 50%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 65 127 63 53
Applied 0 0 0 2 64 10 0
Taken 93 0 18 2 64 10 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 3% 50% 16% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
43%
Taken Rate
85%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 57%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 69 139 61 36
Applied 0 0 0 0 79 25 0
Taken 90 0 12 0 77 25 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 57% 41% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
46%
Taken Rate
96%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 62%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 65 129 51 11
Applied 0 0 0 1 80 29 0
Taken 98 0 12 1 80 40 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 2% 62% 57% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
50%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 76%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 68 135 34 240
Applied 0 0 0 0 102 18 0
Taken 94 0 11 0 101 34 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 76% 53% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
70%
Taken Rate
100%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 134%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 83 167 65 270
Applied 0 0 0 0 103 87 0
Taken 92 0 12 0 102 65 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 62% 134% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
59%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C(S)
Highest demand: 2C(S) at 100%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 78 155 68 270
Applied 0 0 0 0 90 68 0
Taken 107 0 8 0 90 68 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 0% 58% 100% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for Qihua Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"i actually likes this school and i would recemend this school and to those who says the school is very dirty pls dont trust them it is actually very clean and the teachers and students always help out to keep the school clean and the teachers do scold for a reason (eg.homework,did something wrong and more).the teachers always gives you a chance untill u take their chances too far and the students became more behaving thanks to mrs.lee,mr.foo,mdm.nurul,mr thomas ng and all the teachers.I would like to thank the teachers,thank you fro teaching me and educating me to be right person from being a me with no integrety to a me who has integrety. best regards,afiza."

P5-5 NUR AFIZA UMMAIRAH BINTE ABDULLAH
P5-5 NUR AFIZA UMMAIRAH BINTE ABDULLAH

April 27, 2025

"Im apart of this school and trust me this school is peak. If you ever come here look for Mr Kam because he's genuinely SO UNHINGED. Though SOME students (Zhuoran I'm looking at you) are kind of annoying, most of them are silly (in a good way) and funny. I recommend this school and this school is soooooo much better than every other school. You can't change my mind. Five Tsukasa Tenmas."

P5-2 LUCHING LXZ PEREYRA
P5-2 LUCHING LXZ PEREYRA

February 21, 2025

"the worst school ever I hate it they very mean they no good it very dirty pls do not send your kids there"

P5-4 KAUNG THIT OO THANT
P5-4 KAUNG THIT OO THANT

February 03, 2025

"POOR discipline kids. Daily after school, they will be found loitering at Block875 bus stop with their litters. And onboard the bus, they don’t bother to move in. Have to push them aside to allow more passengers to board. School never teach moral education?"

Jane Tan
Jane Tan

January 09, 2025

"I am a P4 (2024) Student of this school and i must say, THE SCHOOL IS ACTUALLY SO FUN like, the people in there are actually so funny and my classmates r very fun! The school is not too small and not too big, and i love the fact mariam jaafar actually visits us every single special event! But there is one problem, the CCAS. Its either the ccas are boring, or the teachers are a little scary. I might be exaggerating over the teachers for no reason, probably because i get startled easily but its whatever. I am in choir, and its not TOO bad. I’m glad i get to spend my 6 primary school years in this fun and exciting school :D"

P5-2 SCARLETT JOHNE MARCELO DIONISIO
P5-2 SCARLETT JOHNE MARCELO DIONISIO

December 04, 2024

"Extremely clean and it had many scenic areas around the school. Canteen vendors especially the drink store uncle was very joyous and excited when tending to customers"

Aaron Ning
Aaron Ning

November 12, 2024

Write A Review