Qihua Primary School, nestled in Woodlands, is a popular choice among parents with a 100% application rate. The school is known for its outstanding achievements in both academics and co-curricular activities, making it highly competitive.
Qihua prides itself on its unique programmes, such as the Novelty Sports Programme, promoting fitness and teamwork among students. Besides, the school's recent news of winning the National STEM Awards showcases their dedication to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics education.
With a strong community spirit and a focus on holistic education, Qihua Primary School is a highly sought-after education hub in the North.
Qihua Primary School
Principal:
Mrs Lee Hui Feng
Vice Principals:
Mr Foo Chuan Kai, Ms Nurul Suhana Binte Sulaiman
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Woodlands MRT Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 120 | 69 | 37 | 112 | 61 | 60 | 60 |
| Applied | 51 | 17 | 0 | 52 | 1 | 0 | 121 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 25% | 0% | 46% | 2% | 0% | 202% | |
| Taken | 51 | 17 | 0 | 52 | 1 | 0 | 121 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 25% | 0% | 46% | 2% | 0% | 202% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 120 | 69 | 38 | 116 | 86 | 80 | 180 |
| Applied | 51 | 15 | 1 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 103 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 22% | 3% | 26% | 7% | 0% | 57% | |
| Taken | 51 | 15 | 1 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 103 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 22% | 3% | 26% | 7% | 0% | 57% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 120 | 60 | 32 | 95 | 53 | 47 | 180 |
| Applied | 60 | 25 | 0 | 42 | 6 | 0 | 133 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 42% | 0% | 44% | 11% | 0% | 74% | |
| Taken | 60 | 25 | 0 | 42 | 6 | 0 | 133 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 42% | 0% | 44% | 11% | 0% | 74% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 121 | 54 | 158 | 102 | 88 | 240 |
| Applied | 59 | 19 | 5 | 56 | 14 | 0 | 153 | |
| % Applied | 33% | 16% | 9% | 35% | 14% | 0% | 64% | |
| Taken | 59 | 19 | 5 | 56 | 14 | 0 | 153 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 16% | 9% | 35% | 14% | 0% | 64% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 121 | 120 | 69 | 137 | 85 | 73 | 240 |
| Applied | 79 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 52 | 12 | 0 | 167 | |
| % Applied | 40% | 1% | 19% | 0% | 38% | 14% | 0% | 70% | |
| Taken | 79 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 52 | 12 | 0 | 167 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 1% | 19% | 0% | 38% | 14% | 0% | 70% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 170 | 113 | 112 | 69 | 133 | 65 | 40 | 210 |
| Applied | 57 | 1 | 15 | 4 | 69 | 25 | 0 | 171 | |
| % Applied | 34% | 1% | 13% | 6% | 52% | 38% | 0% | 81% | |
| Taken | 57 | 1 | 15 | 4 | 69 | 25 | 0 | 171 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 1% | 13% | 6% | 52% | 38% | 0% | 81% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 72 | 72 | 48 | 95 | 28 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 68 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 67 | 30 | 0 | 183 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 1% | 24% | 0% | 71% | 107% | 0% | 102% | |
| Taken | 68 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 67 | 28 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 1% | 24% | 0% | 71% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 83 | 167 | 100 | 71 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 29 | 0 | 96 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 29% | 0% | 40% | |
| Taken | 58 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 67 | 29 | 0 | 170 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 40% | 29% | 0% | 71% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 64 | 128 | 73 | 58 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 15 | 0 | 72 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 21% | 0% | 34% | |
| Taken | 73 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 55 | 15 | 0 | 152 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 72% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 65 | 130 | 83 | 76 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 7 | 0 | 54 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 8% | 0% | 26% | |
| Taken | 64 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 47 | 7 | 0 | 134 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 36% | 8% | 0% | 64% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 65 | 127 | 63 | 53 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 64 | 10 | 0 | 76 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 50% | 16% | 0% | 32% | |
| Taken | 93 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 64 | 10 | 0 | 187 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 8% | 3% | 50% | 16% | 0% | 78% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 69 | 139 | 61 | 36 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 25 | 0 | 104 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 57% | 41% | 0% | 43% | |
| Taken | 90 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 77 | 25 | 0 | 204 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 55% | 41% | 0% | 85% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 65 | 129 | 51 | 11 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 80 | 29 | 0 | 110 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 62% | 57% | 0% | 46% | |
| Taken | 98 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 80 | 40 | 0 | 231 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 5% | 2% | 62% | 78% | 0% | 96% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 68 | 135 | 34 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 102 | 18 | 0 | 120 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 76% | 53% | 0% | 50% | |
| Taken | 94 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 101 | 34 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 75% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 83 | 167 | 65 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 103 | 87 | 0 | 190 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 62% | 134% | 0% | 70% | |
| Taken | 92 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 102 | 65 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 61% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 78 | 155 | 68 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 68 | 0 | 158 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 58% | 100% | 0% | 59% | |
| Taken | 107 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 90 | 68 | 0 | 273 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 58% | 100% | 0% | 101% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Qihua Primary School.
"Im apart of this school and trust me this school is peak. If you ever come here look for Mr Kam because he's genuinely SO UNHINGED. Though SOME students (Zhuoran I'm looking at you) are kind of annoying, most of them are silly (in a good way) and funny. I recommend this school and this school is soooooo much better than every other school. You can't change my mind. Five Tsukasa Tenmas."
February 21, 2025
"POOR discipline kids. Daily after school, they will be found loitering at Block875 bus stop with their litters. And onboard the bus, they don’t bother to move in. Have to push them aside to allow more passengers to board. School never teach moral education?"
January 09, 2025
"I am a P4 (2024) Student of this school and i must say, THE SCHOOL IS ACTUALLY SO FUN like, the people in there are actually so funny and my classmates r very fun! The school is not too small and not too big, and i love the fact mariam jaafar actually visits us every single special event! But there is one problem, the CCAS. Its either the ccas are boring, or the teachers are a little scary. I might be exaggerating over the teachers for no reason, probably because i get startled easily but its whatever. I am in choir, and its not TOO bad. I’m glad i get to spend my 6 primary school years in this fun and exciting school :D"
December 04, 2024
"Extremely clean and it had many scenic areas around the school. Canteen vendors especially the drink store uncle was very joyous and excited when tending to customers"
November 12, 2024
"the worst school ever I hate it they very mean they no good it very dirty pls do not send your kids there"
February 03, 2025
"i actually likes this school and i would recemend this school and to those who says the school is very dirty pls dont trust them it is actually very clean and the teachers and students always help out to keep the school clean and the teachers do scold for a reason (eg.homework,did something wrong and more).the teachers always gives you a chance untill u take their chances too far and the students became more behaving thanks to mrs.lee,mr.foo,mdm.nurul,mr thomas ng and all the teachers.I would like to thank the teachers,thank you fro teaching me and educating me to be right person from being a me with no integrety to a me who has integrety. best regards,afiza."
April 27, 2025