Radin Mas Primary School, a prominent educational institution in Bukit Merah, saw an application rate of 112% for Primary 1 admissions, indicating high competition. The school's reputation for academic excellence, coupled with its holistic education approach, has made it a popular choice among Singaporean parents.
Notably, Radin Mas was recognised for its performance in the National Primary Schools Track and Field Championships. The school also offers special programmes in arts and sports, fostering well-rounded development for students.
Located in the heart of the city, Radin Mas Primary School is a top choice for parents seeking quality education in a convenient location.
Radin Mas Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Tan Sun Sun
Vice Principals:
Mdm Ng Li Yi, Ms Mary Goh Chiu Keng
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Tiong Bahru MRT HarbourFront MRT
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 140 | 63 | 23 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 77 | 54 | 22 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 249 | |
| % Applied | 55% | 86% | 96% | 204% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 77 | 54 | 22 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 200 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 86% | 96% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 140 | 62 | 25 | 52 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 79 | 49 | 24 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 228 | |
| % Applied | 56% | 79% | 96% | 146% | 0% | 0% | 114% | |
| Taken | 79 | 49 | 24 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 204 | |
| % Taken | 56% | 79% | 96% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 102% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 140 | 71 | 25 | 54 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 70 | 56 | 22 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 229 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 79% | 88% | 150% | 0% | 0% | 115% | |
| Taken | 70 | 56 | 22 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 202 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 79% | 88% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 140 | 55 | 20 | 40 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 85 | 62 | 20 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 249 | |
| % Applied | 61% | 113% | 100% | 205% | 0% | 0% | 125% | |
| Taken | 85 | 55 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 200 | |
| % Taken | 61% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 160 | 78 | 48 | 25 | 39 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 82 | 30 | 39 | 12 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 239 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 38% | 81% | 48% | 195% | 0% | 0% | 120% | |
| Taken | 82 | 30 | 39 | 12 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 202 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 38% | 81% | 48% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 160 | 45 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 115 | 28 | 31 | 21 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Applied | 72% | 62% | 172% | 100% | 326% | 0% | 0% | 135% | |
| Taken | 115 | 28 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 205 | |
| % Taken | 72% | 62% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 103% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 160 | 77 | 51 | 33 | 52 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Applied | 83 | 26 | 25 | 16 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 236 | |
| % Applied | 52% | 34% | 49% | 48% | 165% | 0% | 0% | 118% | |
| Taken | 83 | 26 | 25 | 16 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 202 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 34% | 49% | 48% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 21 | 26 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 81 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 86% | 242% | 0% | 0% | 39% | |
| Taken | 115 | 31 | 23 | 15 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 15% | 11% | 71% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 31 | 48 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 74 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 55% | 119% | 0% | 0% | 31% | |
| Taken | 110 | 41 | 27 | 14 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 17% | 11% | 45% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 48 | 86 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 116 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 116% | 0% | 0% | 48% | |
| Taken | 77 | 35 | 33 | 9 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 15% | 14% | 19% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 45 | 72 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 114 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 44% | 131% | 0% | 0% | 48% | |
| Taken | 98 | 19 | 33 | 18 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 8% | 14% | 40% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 20 | 20 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 75 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 110% | 265% | 0% | 0% | 31% | |
| Taken | 134 | 6 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 56% | 3% | 25% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 41 | 50 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 106 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 78% | 148% | 0% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 105 | 0 | 53 | 32 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 22% | 78% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 51 | 50 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 147 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 124% | 168% | 0% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 93 | 0 | 46 | 51 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 19% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 60 | 81 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 118 | 0 | 0 | 158 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 67% | 146% | 0% | 0% | 66% | |
| Taken | 79 | 2 | 40 | 40 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 1% | 17% | 67% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 59 | 88 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 126 | 0 | 0 | 156 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 51% | 143% | 0% | 0% | 65% | |
| Taken | 98 | 0 | 24 | 30 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 10% | 51% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Radin Mas Primary School.
"i love you radin mas i miss you so much i wish i could go back great teachers i love you mrs ten and mr lee and mdm tan i love you i recommend great place great friends great buddy system if they still do that (for the p4s to show the newcoming p1s around during recess) i miss mr farizal great principal very fun activities and fantastic canteen food the school is well built and the 011 batch is great sad we graduated liao but nice school come here for very fun childhood okay"
March 24, 2025
"Very good school and W teachers. I used to be in this primary school and there are many fun activities to do and plenty of cca choices. 10/10 recommend younger audience to go to this school!!"
February 26, 2025
"My school. Canteen food is sooo good! Stall 1: snacks & dim sum (cafe shangri-ba) Stall 2: drinks & fruits (cool station) Stall 3: noodles (taste of asia) Stall 4: japanese food (sunshine cuisine) Stall 5: nasi lemak & hot dogs (gul sedap) Stall 6: economic rice (kurin delight) Stall 7: bee hoon & fish balls (melody place) Stall 8: malay food (halal zone)"
March 16, 2025
"My niece goes to school here and so have I,it is a family tradition,I highly recommend this school if you are looking for a perfect school for your kids."
March 19, 2025
"this is just personal opinion but this is a great primary school the teachers and the teaching style here is great too"
February 12, 2025