Sengkang Green Primary School, located in the heart of Sengkang, Singapore, is a highly competitive and sought-after school with an application rate of 138%. This indicates that for every 240 placements, there were 331 applications.
The school is renowned for its innovative STEM program and dedication to holistic education. Its recent achievement of bagging the Champions title at the National Primary Schools Robotics Championship is a testament to this.
With a high application rate, Sengkang Green Primary School is clearly a popular choice among Singaporean parents, reflecting its excellence in providing quality education.
Sengkang Green Primary School
Principal:
Mr Gau Poh Teck
Vice Principals:
Mdm Adila Ong Kim Luan, Mr Tan Keng Lim Jeremy
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Fernvale LRT (SW5) - (Sengkang West Loop)
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 180 | 95 | 20 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 85 | 119 | 15 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 303 | |
| % Applied | 47% | 125% | 75% | 175% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 85 | 95 | 15 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 243 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 100% | 75% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 180 | 77 | 20 | 42 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 103 | 116 | 18 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 331 | |
| % Applied | 57% | 151% | 90% | 224% | 0% | 0% | 138% | |
| Taken | 103 | 77 | 18 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 57% | 100% | 90% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 220 | 92 | 20 | 45 | 280 | 280 | 280 |
| Applied | 128 | 121 | 15 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 351 | |
| % Applied | 58% | 132% | 75% | 193% | 0% | 0% | 125% | |
| Taken | 128 | 92 | 15 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 280 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 100% | 75% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 220 | 110 | 23 | 49 | 280 | 280 | 280 |
| Applied | 111 | 100 | 21 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 352 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 91% | 91% | 245% | 0% | 0% | 126% | |
| Taken | 111 | 100 | 21 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 281 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 91% | 91% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 240 | 124 | 125 | 44 | 74 | 280 | 280 | 280 |
| Applied | 116 | 0 | 78 | 14 | 117 | 0 | 0 | 325 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 0% | 62% | 32% | 158% | 0% | 0% | 116% | |
| Taken | 116 | 0 | 78 | 14 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 282 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 0% | 62% | 32% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 240 | 123 | 123 | 26 | 36 | 280 | 280 | 280 |
| Applied | 117 | 0 | 111 | 17 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 360 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 0% | 90% | 65% | 319% | 0% | 0% | 129% | |
| Taken | 117 | 0 | 111 | 17 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 281 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 0% | 90% | 65% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 230 | 118 | 118 | 43 | 70 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 112 | 0 | 73 | 15 | 147 | 0 | 0 | 347 | |
| % Applied | 49% | 0% | 62% | 35% | 210% | 0% | 0% | 129% | |
| Taken | 112 | 0 | 73 | 15 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 0% | 62% | 35% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 39 | 54 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 157 | 0 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 62% | 291% | 0% | 0% | 67% | |
| Taken | 125 | 0 | 68 | 23 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 46% | 0% | 25% | 59% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 59 | 102 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 226 | 0 | 0 | 244 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 222% | 0% | 0% | 102% | |
| Taken | 121 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 77 | 133 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 297 | 0 | 0 | 318 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 223% | 0% | 0% | 133% | |
| Taken | 85 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 133 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 71 | 130 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 297 | 0 | 0 | 309 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 228% | 0% | 0% | 129% | |
| Taken | 99 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 130 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 0% | 15% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 100 | 193 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 256 | 0 | 0 | 263 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 133% | 0% | 0% | 110% | |
| Taken | 40 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 193 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 17% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 113 | 223 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 230 | 0 | 0 | 232 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 103% | 0% | 0% | 97% | |
| Taken | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 223 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 6% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 105 | 210 | 102 | 52 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 109 | 15 | 0 | 124 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 52% | 15% | 0% | 59% | |
| Taken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108 | 50 | 0 | 158 | |
| % Taken | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 51% | 49% | 0% | 75% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Sengkang Green Primary School.
"Thruout the years, except for Ms Beh who have left, who put in effort to send regular emails to update the progress, alot of the times I heard teacher on MC, teacher not here, teacher goes on leave, relief teachers. The overall grade was very bad as well, compared to other kids in other school for PSLE. Was it the teaching method? Neighbours and some other parents share the same thoughts too. With teachers who can't bother to reply parents emails."
January 03, 2025
"Not a good school who made the parents wait outside the gate when we came earlier than 1030 for the PSLE Results. Cmon lah, have some compassion for the parents who were waiting outside. Would not even let us wait at the canteen. Never had a good impression of this school from beginning. A backward school. Management committee of the school, please review your process. I've never come across a school who treats the parents like they don't matter."
November 20, 2024
"I really like this school principal and the discipline people because their speech always help me sleep 💤💤💤"
February 01, 2025
"i love and don love this school y? firstly i love this school because it brought a lot of fun memory i had in this school,secondly i dont like this discipline master because he only finds problem between my siblings and me, a lot of racist people in this school.I have graduated this school since 2020 i would still recommend this school because its fun and to those that is near from their block"
July 29, 2024
"Nice school but crazy fight between fenvale primary and this school"
February 26, 2025
"played against their basketball senior girls team (2025) very ugly behaviour, they were very rude and aggressive. No manners at all. I fell down on the ground during the game and they started laughing, we lost to them in the end. Very arrogant behaviour towards us after the match. Please teach your children proper etiquette and how to act during a match."
April 08, 2025