SI Ling Primary School, nestled in the heart of Woodlands, offers a 100% application rate, accommodating all 73 applications last year. Known for its stellar curriculum, the school prides itself on its distinctive Bicultural Chinese Programme that sharpens students' bilingual competencies.
Recently, SI Ling's pupils clinched the National Primary Schools Chinese Creative Writing Competition, underscoring the school's commitment to academic excellence. The school's balanced approach toward holistic development and competitive admission trends make it a sought-after choice for parents aiming for all-rounded growth for their children at Primary 1 level.
Si Ling Primary School
Principal:
Mr Koe Ee Tiong
Vice Principals:
Mdm Nurazian Binte Bajuri, Mr Raj Kumar s/o V Sivalingam
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Woodlands
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 90 | 66 | 39 | 118 | 92 | 88 | 88 |
| Applied | 24 | 9 | 0 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 63 | |
| % Applied | 27% | 14% | 0% | 22% | 4% | 0% | 72% | |
| Taken | 24 | 9 | 0 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 63 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 14% | 0% | 22% | 4% | 0% | 72% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 90 | 63 | 38 | 114 | 79 | 77 | 150 |
| Applied | 27 | 9 | 0 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 73 | |
| % Applied | 30% | 14% | 0% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 49% | |
| Taken | 27 | 9 | 0 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 73 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 14% | 0% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 49% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 90 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 78 | 77 | 150 |
| Applied | 40 | 10 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 73 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 20% | 0% | 22% | 1% | 0% | 49% | |
| Taken | 40 | 10 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 73 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 20% | 0% | 22% | 1% | 0% | 49% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 90 | 45 | 32 | 97 | 80 | 68 | 150 |
| Applied | 45 | 8 | 0 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 82 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 18% | 0% | 18% | 15% | 0% | 55% | |
| Taken | 45 | 8 | 0 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 82 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 18% | 0% | 18% | 15% | 0% | 55% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 110 | 72 | 72 | 52 | 103 | 79 | 71 | 150 |
| Applied | 38 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 79 | |
| % Applied | 35% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 23% | 10% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 38 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 79 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 23% | 10% | 0% | 53% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 140 | 108 | 107 | 68 | 136 | 120 | 107 | 180 |
| Applied | 34 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 75 | |
| % Applied | 24% | 1% | 10% | 0% | 12% | 11% | 0% | 42% | |
| Taken | 34 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 75 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 1% | 10% | 0% | 12% | 11% | 0% | 42% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 110 | 73 | 73 | 54 | 108 | 75 | 53 | 150 |
| Applied | 37 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 34 | 22 | 0 | 99 | |
| % Applied | 34% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 31% | 29% | 0% | 66% | |
| Taken | 37 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 34 | 22 | 0 | 99 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 31% | 29% | 0% | 66% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 71 | 144 | 99 | 92 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 7 | 0 | 52 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 7% | 0% | 25% | |
| Taken | 57 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 45 | 7 | 0 | 120 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 31% | 7% | 0% | 57% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 65 | 130 | 102 | 100 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 2 | 0 | 31 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 22% | 2% | 0% | 17% | |
| Taken | 43 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 80 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 22% | 2% | 0% | 44% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 60 | 120 | 81 | 69 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 12 | 0 | 51 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 15% | 0% | 28% | |
| Taken | 53 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 39 | 12 | 0 | 111 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 33% | 15% | 0% | 62% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 71 | 142 | 106 | 102 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 40 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 4% | 0% | 19% | |
| Taken | 61 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 109 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 25% | 4% | 0% | 52% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 79 | 158 | 123 | 93 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 30 | 0 | 69 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 24% | 0% | 29% | |
| Taken | 69 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 35 | 30 | 0 | 147 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 22% | 24% | 0% | 61% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 82 | 161 | 119 | 16 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 44 | 25 | 0 | 71 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 27% | 21% | 0% | 30% | |
| Taken | 63 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 44 | 103 | 0 | 226 | |
| % Taken | 26% | 0% | 5% | 2% | 27% | 87% | 0% | 94% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 76 | 150 | 102 | 55 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 49 | 33 | 0 | 84 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 33% | 32% | 0% | 35% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 48 | 47 | 0 | 185 | |
| % Taken | 30% | 0% | 7% | 3% | 32% | 46% | 0% | 77% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 88 | 173 | 111 | 58 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 62 | 29 | 0 | 94 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 36% | 26% | 0% | 35% | |
| Taken | 72 | 8 | 15 | 3 | 62 | 53 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Taken | 27% | 3% | 6% | 3% | 36% | 48% | 0% | 79% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 93 | 183 | 146 | 66 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 43 | 23 | 0 | 68 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 24% | 16% | 0% | 25% | |
| Taken | 65 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 43 | 23 | 0 | 153 | |
| % Taken | 24% | 1% | 6% | 2% | 24% | 16% | 0% | 57% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Si Ling Primary School.
"Is good and fun and kinda a bit tried but not that much homework sometimes but there's been a lot of cases like students in our class doing something bad and have to listen for a hour I mean the canteen was pretty my favorite part but the fact I always see some students planing something bad and another thing the teachers were nice and good but some were strict and I guess p5 getting more harder la so I'll try my best!"
January 17, 2025
"School with teachers and principle caring skillfully for the student's character development more than the grades. Friendly cosy comfy welcoming ambience for educating and bringing out the best from each individuals to function efficiently independently and co-operatively in the society. Excellent place to bring up future leaders. Conveniently located in the neighbourhood heartland within walking distance of few bus stops from Woodlands MRT station bus interchange Causeway Point and Civic centre with plenty of dinning shopping banking supermarkets library postage community centre cinemas entertainment and amenities nearby."
March 04, 2019
"Glad to see the this school has gotten better now. Back when I was studying during the 2010s here, the bullying cases were so bad and even a teacher was a bully herself. The school didn't do much but I had to go for counselling frequently just to get by my day. And no kid should experience bullying at all. I hope that teacher no longer teaches in this school so she won't have to traumatize anyone anymore. My depression continued till secondary school because of the trauma she gave me."
May 05, 2024
"I am writing this to express my sincere appreciation for the exceptional educational experience my child has going through. The dedication from teachers are remarkable as not only bring positive impact to child's academic but also personal growth. Congrats for achieving 100% PLSE passing rate!"
November 24, 2023
"When my son was P1, i enrolled him to SLPS caused we stay near the school. When he was P1, SLPS is not consider a good school and PSLE passing rate is low. Initially, i was worried for him. But year by year, i see the changes in school getting better and teachers are approachable and committed to teach the student, especially his P1 front teacher, Mr Lim Kim Tze. This year, he passed his PSLE with flying color with total AL8 and top 7 in school. The school also have 100 percent passing mark for PSLE. Well done to both my son and the school !! Lastly, i hope the school can have the exchange book corner back in school. I used to recycle my boy used text book and put his book in school's book exchange corner. In return, i will collect the recycle book from the book exchange corner and for my son used for next year. This has stop during cov period and i hope the school will consider to put it back. This can allow we all to recycle the book and can benefit the unprivileged family. Awareness has to be communicate to the parent and kids if this book exchange corner has reinstate."
November 30, 2023