St Anthonys Canossian Primary School

1602 BEDOK NORTH AVE 4, 469701

64492239

At a glance

St. Anthony's Canossian Primary School, nestled in the heart of Bedok, is an in-demand choice for parents, boasting an application rate of 114%.

School Type
Government-aided Sch
Session Type
Single Session
Nearest MRT
Bedok MRT
Latest Ballot Year
2025
Government-aided Sch Girls' School Single Session sessions Nearest MRT: Bedok MRT
Principal

Mdm Sharon Clarissa Lee Hui Chin

Vice Principals

Miss Thia Hwei Ling Sharon, Ms Lee Xinyun Felicia

Website

http://www.stanthonyscanossianpri.moe.edu.sg

Email

sacps@moe.edu.sg

School Image
School Image
School Image

Ballot Results

See each year at a glance, then compare phase-by-phase demand in a cleaner format.

Learn About the Phases
P1 Registration Phases
  • Phase 1: For siblings of current students.
  • Phase 2A(1): For children of alumni and School Advisory/Management Committee members.
  • Phase 2A(2): For children of former students and staff.
  • Phase 2A: Combined 2A phase used in newer ballot records.
  • Phase 2B: For parent volunteers and selected community affiliations.
  • Phase 2C: For children with no prior link to the school.
  • Phase 2C(S): Supplementary phase for remaining vacancies.
  • Phase 3: For international students.
Trend by Year

Applied rate and taken rate compared across ballot years.

Applied Rate Taken Rate
90% 115% 140% 165% 190% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 176% 170% 117% 101%
Recent format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2025
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
117%
Taken Rate
101%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 146%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 102 39 85 0 0
Applied 78 45 34 124 0 0
Taken 78 45 34 85 0 0
Taken Rate 43% 44% 87% 146% - -
2024
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
172%
Taken Rate
150%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 99%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 90 46 122 240 240
Applied 90 42 39 121 31 0
Taken 90 42 36 72 31 0
Taken Rate 50% 47% 85% 99% 13% 0%
2023
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
153%
Taken Rate
148%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 69%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 124 58 165 240 240
Applied 70 44 24 114 33 0
Taken 70 44 24 102 33 0
Taken Rate 39% 35% 41% 69% 14% 0%
2022
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
170%
Taken Rate
150%
Highest Demand
2B
Highest demand: 2B at 58%
Metric Phase 1 2A 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 180 149 67 194 220 220
Applied 87 38 39 105 51 0
Taken 87 38 32 65 51 0
Taken Rate 48% 26% 58% 54% 23% 0%
Older format

Vacancy shows available places. Applied rate shows demand. Taken rate above 100% means the phase was oversubscribed.

2021
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
175%
Taken Rate
160%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 55%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 142 141 86 161 210 210
Applied 80 17 35 29 89 54 0
Taken 80 17 35 29 51 54 0
Taken Rate 40% 12% 25% 34% 55% 26% 0%
2020
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
180%
Taken Rate
156%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 57%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 200 149 146 89 167 210 210
Applied 106 9 23 33 96 51 0
Taken 106 9 23 33 40 51 0
Taken Rate 53% 6% 16% 37% 57% 24% 0%
2019
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
210
Applied Rate
176%
Taken Rate
170%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 59%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 170 135 133 84 148 210 210
Applied 77 10 25 25 87 23 0
Taken 77 10 25 25 74 23 0
Taken Rate 45% 7% 19% 30% 59% 11% 0%
2018
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
116%
Taken Rate
178%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 52%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 91 165 210 210
Applied 0 0 0 31 86 64 0
Taken 99 6 16 29 79 64 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 34% 52% 30% 0%
2017
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
107%
Taken Rate
175%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 119%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 59 90 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 31 107 18 0
Taken 96 5 21 28 90 18 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 53% 119% 8% 0%
2016
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
90%
Taken Rate
158%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 76%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 79 136 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 25 103 5 0
Taken 101 5 18 23 93 5 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 32% 76% 2% 0%
2015
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
98%
Taken Rate
169%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 72%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 73 124 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 43 89 24 0
Taken 100 6 15 42 77 24 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 59% 72% 10% 0%
2014
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
125%
Taken Rate
187%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 80%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 78 120 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 49 96 26 0
Taken 92 5 14 47 92 26 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 63% 80% 11% 0%
2013
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
123%
Taken Rate
189%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 92%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 76 119 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 34 110 15 0
Taken 98 3 22 34 109 12 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 45% 92% 6% 0%
2012
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
115%
Taken Rate
188%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 111%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 66 100 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 40 111 0 0
Taken 89 2 21 40 100 0 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 61% 111% 0% 0%
2011
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
240
Applied Rate
138%
Taken Rate
188%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 99%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 240 240 240 78 125 240 240
Applied 0 0 0 37 124 53 0
Taken 77 4 23 36 101 39 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 47% 99% 22% 0%
2010
Historical ballot data
Vacancies
270
Applied Rate
122%
Taken Rate
178%
Highest Demand
2C
Highest demand: 2C at 109%
Metric Phase 1 2A(1) 2A(2) 2B 2C 2C(S) 3
Vacancies 270 270 270 78 118 270 270
Applied 0 0 0 50 129 30 0
Taken 95 0 19 50 106 26 0
Taken Rate 0% 0% 0% 64% 109% 11% 0%

School Reviews

Read Google and parent-contributed reviews for St Anthonys Canossian Primary School, or share your own experience below.

"As an alumni, I can tell you that the students there bully teachers and vape. People as young as P2 vape. (Not me)"

Mineral Water
Mineral Water

April 22, 2025

"This school is very good and requires lots of equipment when you don't have them I really think you should go in! Good luck🍡🍧🍙"

Anggi Juwana
Anggi Juwana

February 06, 2025

"School students littering and public space and running around in MRT station. The putrefying trash is making it harder for cleaners to clean ! School should educate their students about not littering in public !"

Coco Yu
Coco Yu

November 13, 2024

"My daughter is in this school now and she is loving it. Tho exams are not that easy my daughter told me that she enjoys it very much. And also the teachers are very kind and understandable."

Marie Goh
Marie Goh

October 08, 2024

"Fantastic school that my daughter has been attending for the last 3 years. Teachers are excellent and very caring. My daughter has made loads of friends and loves SACPS. For parents, there is WhatsApp groups and plenty of opportunity to volunteer at school events, though no pressure if you don’t want too. Got nothing but positive things to say about SACPS. Thanks so much!"

D J
D J

August 16, 2024

"Love the school’s art gallery, cosy library and garden for the girls. Their classrooms also provide a positive learning environment. The P1 orientation tour and info talk were very helpful for us to find out more about the school."

Lu Fam
Lu Fam

May 22, 2022

Write A Review