St. Anthony's Canossian Primary School, nestled in the heart of Bedok, is an in-demand choice for parents, boasting an application rate of 114%.
This means it received 412 applications for its 360 placements last year. Known for its dedication to holistic education, the school has a strong focus on leadership and character development.
Notably, St. Anthony's Canossian Primary School has recently been recognized for its commitment to environmental education, receiving the President's Award for the Environment.
Coupled with a diverse range of special programs like sports and arts, this school stands as a fiercely competitive option for your child's Primary 1 admission.
St Anthonys Canossian Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Sharon Clarissa Lee Hui Chin
Vice Principals:
Miss Thia Hwei Ling Sharon, Ms Lee Xinyun Felicia
Session Type:
Single Session
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Bedok MRT
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 180 | 102 | 39 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 78 | 45 | 34 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 281 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 44% | 87% | 146% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 78 | 45 | 34 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 242 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 44% | 87% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 180 | 90 | 46 | 122 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 90 | 42 | 39 | 121 | 31 | 0 | 412 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 47% | 85% | 99% | 13% | 0% | 172% | |
| Taken | 90 | 42 | 36 | 72 | 31 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 47% | 78% | 59% | 13% | 0% | 150% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 180 | 124 | 58 | 165 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 70 | 44 | 24 | 114 | 33 | 0 | 366 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 35% | 41% | 69% | 14% | 0% | 153% | |
| Taken | 70 | 44 | 24 | 102 | 33 | 0 | 273 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 35% | 41% | 62% | 14% | 0% | 148% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 149 | 67 | 194 | 220 | 220 | 240 |
| Applied | 87 | 38 | 39 | 105 | 51 | 0 | 407 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 26% | 58% | 54% | 23% | 0% | 170% | |
| Taken | 87 | 38 | 32 | 65 | 51 | 0 | 273 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 26% | 48% | 34% | 23% | 0% | 150% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 142 | 141 | 86 | 161 | 210 | 210 | 240 |
| Applied | 80 | 17 | 35 | 29 | 89 | 54 | 0 | 421 | |
| % Applied | 40% | 12% | 25% | 34% | 55% | 26% | 0% | 175% | |
| Taken | 80 | 17 | 35 | 29 | 51 | 54 | 0 | 266 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 12% | 25% | 34% | 32% | 26% | 0% | 160% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 149 | 146 | 89 | 167 | 210 | 210 | 240 |
| Applied | 106 | 9 | 23 | 33 | 96 | 51 | 0 | 431 | |
| % Applied | 53% | 6% | 16% | 37% | 57% | 24% | 0% | 180% | |
| Taken | 106 | 9 | 23 | 33 | 40 | 51 | 0 | 262 | |
| % Taken | 53% | 6% | 16% | 37% | 24% | 24% | 0% | 156% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 135 | 133 | 84 | 148 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 77 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 87 | 23 | 0 | 370 | |
| % Applied | 45% | 7% | 19% | 30% | 59% | 11% | 0% | 176% | |
| Taken | 77 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 74 | 23 | 0 | 234 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 7% | 19% | 30% | 50% | 11% | 0% | 170% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 91 | 165 | 210 | 210 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 86 | 64 | 0 | 278 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 34% | 52% | 30% | 0% | 116% | |
| Taken | 99 | 6 | 16 | 29 | 79 | 64 | 0 | 293 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 3% | 7% | 32% | 48% | 30% | 0% | 178% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 59 | 90 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 107 | 18 | 0 | 256 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 53% | 119% | 8% | 0% | 107% | |
| Taken | 96 | 5 | 21 | 28 | 90 | 18 | 0 | 258 | |
| % Taken | 40% | 2% | 9% | 47% | 100% | 8% | 0% | 175% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 79 | 136 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 103 | 5 | 0 | 215 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 32% | 76% | 2% | 0% | 90% | |
| Taken | 101 | 5 | 18 | 23 | 93 | 5 | 0 | 245 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 2% | 8% | 29% | 68% | 2% | 0% | 158% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 73 | 124 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 89 | 24 | 0 | 234 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 59% | 72% | 10% | 0% | 98% | |
| Taken | 100 | 6 | 15 | 42 | 77 | 24 | 0 | 264 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 3% | 6% | 58% | 62% | 10% | 0% | 169% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 78 | 120 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 96 | 26 | 0 | 299 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 63% | 80% | 11% | 0% | 125% | |
| Taken | 92 | 5 | 14 | 47 | 92 | 26 | 0 | 276 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 2% | 6% | 60% | 77% | 11% | 0% | 187% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 76 | 119 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 110 | 15 | 0 | 296 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 45% | 92% | 6% | 0% | 123% | |
| Taken | 98 | 3 | 22 | 34 | 109 | 12 | 0 | 278 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 1% | 9% | 45% | 92% | 5% | 0% | 189% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 66 | 100 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 275 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 61% | 111% | 0% | 0% | 115% | |
| Taken | 89 | 2 | 21 | 40 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 252 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 1% | 9% | 61% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 188% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 78 | 125 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 124 | 53 | 0 | 331 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 47% | 99% | 22% | 0% | 138% | |
| Taken | 77 | 4 | 23 | 36 | 101 | 39 | 0 | 280 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 2% | 10% | 46% | 81% | 16% | 0% | 188% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 78 | 118 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 129 | 30 | 0 | 329 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 64% | 109% | 11% | 0% | 122% | |
| Taken | 95 | 0 | 19 | 50 | 106 | 26 | 0 | 296 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 7% | 64% | 90% | 10% | 0% | 178% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with St Anthonys Canossian Primary School.
"My daughter is in this school now and she is loving it. Tho exams are not that easy my daughter told me that she enjoys it very much. And also the teachers are very kind and understandable."
October 08, 2024
"This school is very good and requires lots of equipment when you don't have them I really think you should go in! Good luck🍡🍧🍙"
February 06, 2025
"School students littering and public space and running around in MRT station. The putrefying trash is making it harder for cleaners to clean ! School should educate their students about not littering in public !"
November 13, 2024
"Fantastic school that my daughter has been attending for the last 3 years. Teachers are excellent and very caring. My daughter has made loads of friends and loves SACPS. For parents, there is WhatsApp groups and plenty of opportunity to volunteer at school events, though no pressure if you don’t want too. Got nothing but positive things to say about SACPS. Thanks so much!"
August 16, 2024
"Love the school’s art gallery, cosy library and garden for the girls. Their classrooms also provide a positive learning environment. The P1 orientation tour and info talk were very helpful for us to find out more about the school."
May 22, 2022
"As an alumni, I can tell you that the students there bully teachers and vape. People as young as P2 vape. (Not me)"
April 22, 2025