ST Hilda's Primary School is a highly sought-after institution with an application rate of 151%, indicating its competitive nature. It received 408 applications for 271 available placements in the recent Primary 1 admission.
Known for its excellent academic track record, the school also excels in co-curricular activities, particularly in sports and arts. It's situated in a serene and comfortable environment in Tampines, making it a favourable choice among local residents.
With its unique blend of holistic curriculum and nurturing environment, ST Hilda's Primary School is a top choice for Singaporean parents.
St Hildas Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Law Li Mei
Vice Principals:
Mdm Low Ai Ling, Mdm Ng Yin Sze Josephine
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Tampines West, Tampines Central
School Type:
Government-aided Sch
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 220 | 91 | 20 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 129 | 91 | 29 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 385 | |
| % Applied | 59% | 100% | 145% | 316% | - | - | - | |
| Taken | 129 | 91 | 20 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 283 | |
| % Taken | 59% | 100% | 100% | 100% | - | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 210 | 76 | 20 | 41 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 134 | 112 | 33 | 129 | 0 | 0 | 408 | |
| % Applied | 64% | 147% | 165% | 315% | 0% | 0% | 151% | |
| Taken | 134 | 76 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 64% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 210 | 103 | 20 | 40 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 107 | 113 | 36 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 392 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 110% | 180% | 340% | 0% | 0% | 145% | |
| Taken | 107 | 103 | 20 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 210 | 69 | 20 | 41 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 141 | 94 | 40 | 144 | 0 | 0 | 419 | |
| % Applied | 67% | 136% | 200% | 351% | 0% | 0% | 155% | |
| Taken | 141 | 69 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 67% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 230 | 97 | 30 | 21 | 20 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 133 | 67 | 33 | 51 | 118 | 0 | 0 | 402 | |
| % Applied | 58% | 69% | 110% | 243% | 590% | 0% | 0% | 149% | |
| Taken | 133 | 67 | 30 | 21 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 58% | 69% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 230 | 89 | 19 | 20 | 22 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 141 | 70 | 36 | 37 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 363 | |
| % Applied | 61% | 79% | 189% | 185% | 359% | 0% | 0% | 134% | |
| Taken | 141 | 70 | 19 | 20 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Taken | 61% | 79% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 230 | 136 | 95 | 56 | 68 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 94 | 42 | 23 | 45 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 314 | |
| % Applied | 41% | 31% | 24% | 80% | 162% | 0% | 0% | 116% | |
| Taken | 94 | 42 | 23 | 45 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 272 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 31% | 24% | 80% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 20 | 21 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 142 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 200% | 486% | 0% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 153 | 39 | 38 | 19 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 57% | 14% | 14% | 95% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 35 | 34 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 142 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 166% | 247% | 0% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 131 | 34 | 36 | 35 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 13% | 13% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 51 | 52 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 104% | 213% | 0% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 119 | 22 | 28 | 49 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 8% | 10% | 96% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 44 | 44 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 0 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 114% | 243% | 0% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 119 | 21 | 43 | 43 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 8% | 16% | 98% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 54 | 54 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 106 | 0 | 0 | 168 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 115% | 196% | 0% | 0% | 62% | |
| Taken | 106 | 16 | 40 | 54 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 6% | 15% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 34 | 34 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 122 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 153% | 206% | 0% | 0% | 45% | |
| Taken | 144 | 18 | 40 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 53% | 7% | 15% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 43 | 42 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 137 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 121% | 202% | 0% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 131 | 11 | 43 | 43 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 49% | 4% | 16% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 38 | 38 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 129% | 303% | 0% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 146 | 8 | 40 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 54% | 3% | 15% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 43 | 43 | 270 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 127 | 0 | 0 | 195 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 158% | 295% | 0% | 0% | 72% | |
| Taken | 141 | 6 | 37 | 43 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 270 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 2% | 14% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with St Hildas Primary School.
"I am so glad I joined this school!!! The teachers were so nice and helpful towards pupils!!!! They comforted me in times of need and helped me pass psle with ease. I would recommend this school 10/10!!🥳"
January 11, 2025
"Thank you all the teachers for yr hard work and commitment on the students. Special Appreciation for all my 3 children, passing out 1 after another over the past years. Excel not just by looking at the grade, but by the character. May the Lord who start the good work nurturing the kids continue to finish it."
October 16, 2024
"Best school ever ❤️❤️❤️ Thank you to everyone for all the memories throughout my six years there ✨🫶"
March 07, 2024
"this school has very bad teachers it gave me a brain tumor also someone put a pipe bomb in the toilet (picture below) never going to this school again"
April 20, 2024
"As an ex-student I feel that SHPS is a very good school with kind teachers and helpful friends"
August 14, 2023