Tampines North Primary School, known for its commitment to holistic education, has an application rate of 108%, indicating a high level of competitiveness. This is based on the recent Primary 1 data, which showed 566 applications for 523 available spots.
The school has made its mark in the local scene with its distinctive arts and sports programs. It is conveniently located in the heart of Tampines, making it an ideal choice for parents residing in the East.
With a history of noteworthy achievements and a nurturing learning environment, Tampines North Primary School remains a top choice for many Singaporean parents.
Tampines North Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Ratna Kumari d/o R Ramachandra
Vice Principals:
Mdm Tay Mei Xian Charmaine, Mr Mohamed Yusuff Mohamed Allie
Session Type:
Single Session
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Tampines MRT
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 220 | 126 | 44 | 131 | 47 | 0 | 0 |
| Applied | 94 | 54 | 2 | 84 | 111 | 0 | 345 | |
| % Applied | 43% | 43% | 5% | 64% | 236% | - | - | |
| Taken | 94 | 54 | 2 | 84 | 47 | 0 | 281 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 43% | 5% | 64% | 100% | - | - | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 220 | 131 | 59 | 177 | 240 | 280 | 280 |
| Applied | 98 | 59 | 0 | 99 | 160 | 0 | 566 | |
| % Applied | 45% | 45% | 0% | 56% | 67% | 0% | 202% | |
| Taken | 98 | 59 | 0 | 86 | 130 | 0 | 373 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 45% | 0% | 49% | 54% | 0% | 187% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 180 | 103 | 46 | 138 | 91 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 84 | 62 | 0 | 92 | 127 | 0 | 560 | |
| % Applied | 47% | 60% | 0% | 67% | 140% | 0% | 233% | |
| Taken | 84 | 62 | 0 | 92 | 91 | 0 | 329 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 60% | 0% | 67% | 100% | 0% | 200% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 180 | 99 | 49 | 146 | 100 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 92 | 66 | 2 | 81 | 48 | 0 | 448 | |
| % Applied | 51% | 67% | 4% | 55% | 48% | 0% | 187% | |
| Taken | 92 | 66 | 2 | 81 | 48 | 0 | 289 | |
| % Taken | 51% | 67% | 4% | 55% | 48% | 0% | 181% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 126 | 126 | 78 | 155 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 96 | 1 | 43 | 0 | 105 | 57 | 0 | 449 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 1% | 34% | 0% | 68% | 24% | 0% | 187% | |
| Taken | 96 | 1 | 43 | 0 | 102 | 57 | 0 | 299 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 1% | 34% | 0% | 66% | 24% | 0% | 186% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 122 | 121 | 74 | 147 | 210 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 95 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 98 | 95 | 0 | 497 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 1% | 27% | 1% | 67% | 45% | 0% | 207% | |
| Taken | 95 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 83 | 66 | 0 | 279 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 1% | 27% | 1% | 56% | 31% | 0% | 189% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 170 | 110 | 110 | 71 | 141 | 180 | 180 | 210 |
| Applied | 72 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 94 | 33 | 0 | 364 | |
| % Applied | 42% | 0% | 16% | 3% | 67% | 18% | 0% | 173% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 90 | 33 | 0 | 215 | |
| % Taken | 42% | 0% | 16% | 3% | 64% | 18% | 0% | 171% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 74 | 147 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 115 | 112 | 0 | 293 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 78% | 53% | 0% | 140% | |
| Taken | 77 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 107 | 85 | 0 | 295 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 0% | 11% | 3% | 73% | 40% | 0% | 200% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 59 | 118 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 92 | 44 | 0 | 218 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 78% | 24% | 0% | 121% | |
| Taken | 67 | 1 | 29 | 2 | 81 | 40 | 0 | 220 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 1% | 16% | 3% | 69% | 22% | 0% | 201% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 58 | 115 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 72 | 15 | 0 | 141 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 63% | 8% | 0% | 78% | |
| Taken | 85 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 71 | 15 | 0 | 196 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 62% | 8% | 0% | 173% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 70 | 139 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 120 | 25 | 0 | 234 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 86% | 12% | 0% | 111% | |
| Taken | 80 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 102 | 25 | 0 | 237 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 73% | 12% | 0% | 187% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 63 | 126 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 116 | 21 | 0 | 206 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 92% | 10% | 0% | 98% | |
| Taken | 80 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 110 | 21 | 0 | 231 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 7% | 8% | 87% | 10% | 0% | 180% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 67 | 131 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 119 | 17 | 0 | 208 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 91% | 8% | 0% | 99% | |
| Taken | 74 | 0 | 20 | 7 | 109 | 22 | 0 | 232 | |
| % Taken | 35% | 0% | 10% | 10% | 83% | 10% | 0% | 178% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 68 | 129 | 55 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 127 | 14 | 0 | 231 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 98% | 25% | 0% | 110% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 127 | 16 | 0 | 235 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 6% | 10% | 98% | 29% | 0% | 184% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 61 | 121 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 123 | 41 | 0 | 222 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 102% | 20% | 0% | 106% | |
| Taken | 80 | 3 | 14 | 2 | 118 | 41 | 0 | 258 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 1% | 7% | 3% | 98% | 20% | 0% | 189% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 64 | 127 | 51 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 89 | 46 | 0 | 237 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 70% | 90% | 0% | 113% | |
| Taken | 91 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 89 | 42 | 0 | 236 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 0% | 5% | 3% | 70% | 82% | 0% | 197% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Tampines North Primary School.
"Hi! I study this school for 6 years and in my experience the teachers are nice and aunties and uncles at the stalls the only problem is probably bullying and naughty students and pls be aware of the behavior of the students there even leaders "
February 06, 2025
"im a senior of this school and its very bad , prefer old principaland got kicked out of school team for no reason? but mr ang who left was goated and ms candy lim was good and why didn't i get invited back to the sch man"
February 11, 2025
"This is my school and its the best school ever! No doubt they serve the best food at stall 6 and 4 but 6 has their signature cheese stick at a price of 70 cent so cheep right? Then for stall 4 has the signature mac and cheese the best if u add extra chicken spicy chicken somemore lehhh very sedap it is 3 dollar plus we got chromebook so lucky the teachers are great but some are very fierce or kind best teachers are: [Mr xu, mdm liew, mis song, Mdm sharifah, mdm rafidah, Mr lim the English teacher, Mr lim the pe teacher] .Overall rating 8/10."
July 27, 2024
"Even though this is my school, it is not that good but not bad. It is the principal has problems. Food is not the best(stall 4 is the best out of all of them). Some Teachers are excellent but some are bad since they are old like a Karen. CCA is not bad since you get good teachers. Environment is good, but please FIX AND CLEAN THE TOILET PROPERLY, PEOPLE WHO THROW RUBBISH THAT MAKE THE TOILET FLOOD ARE ************(oops). But overall , this school is not bad. *BEST TEACHERS IN THIS SCHOOL: Ms Jasmine Yap , Mrs Lisa Lee, Mr Alan Aw , Mr Ang , Mdm Chua and Mr Siew(can be fierce so be careful)"
February 27, 2024
"Was a student here batch of 2022. This school was the best primary school possible. A lot of the teachers are very friendly, and the learning environment and school culture is rich and good. Would not hesitate to go back to this school again. Tampines north primary school 🔛🔝"
October 07, 2023