Xingnan Primary School, located in the heart of Singapore, consistently witnesses a 100% application rate, indicating its high desirability among parents. This established school, known for its innovative teaching methods, had 158 applications and successfully placed all in the recent admissions.
Xingnan takes pride in its unique programs, particularly its award-winning STEM curriculum. In addition to academic excellence, the school has garnered recognition for its outstanding sports and arts programs.
This school's competitiveness and commitment to holistic education make it a top choice for parents seeking primary 1 admissions.
Xingnan Primary School
Principal:
Ms Chan Sin Li, Cindy
Vice Principals:
Mdm S Anitha, Mdm Ang Hwee Loo
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Pioneer MRT Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 120 | 54 | 32 | 97 | 51 | 35 | 35 |
| Applied | 66 | 17 | 0 | 47 | 16 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Applied | 55% | 31% | 0% | 48% | 31% | 0% | 417% | |
| Taken | 66 | 17 | 0 | 47 | 16 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Taken | 55% | 31% | 0% | 48% | 31% | 0% | 417% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 120 | 53 | 30 | 90 | 42 | 23 | 180 |
| Applied | 67 | 23 | 1 | 48 | 19 | 0 | 158 | |
| % Applied | 56% | 43% | 3% | 53% | 45% | 0% | 88% | |
| Taken | 67 | 23 | 1 | 48 | 19 | 0 | 158 | |
| % Taken | 56% | 43% | 3% | 53% | 45% | 0% | 88% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 150 | 101 | 48 | 143 | 100 | 89 | 210 |
| Applied | 49 | 18 | 0 | 43 | 11 | 0 | 121 | |
| % Applied | 33% | 18% | 0% | 30% | 11% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 49 | 18 | 0 | 43 | 11 | 0 | 121 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 18% | 0% | 30% | 11% | 0% | 58% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 240 | 153 | 63 | 187 | 123 | 90 | 300 |
| Applied | 87 | 25 | 1 | 64 | 33 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Applied | 36% | 16% | 2% | 34% | 27% | 0% | 70% | |
| Taken | 87 | 25 | 1 | 64 | 33 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 16% | 2% | 34% | 27% | 0% | 70% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 260 | 188 | 188 | 103 | 204 | 105 | 49 | 300 |
| Applied | 72 | 0 | 23 | 1 | 99 | 56 | 0 | 251 | |
| % Applied | 28% | 0% | 12% | 1% | 49% | 53% | 0% | 84% | |
| Taken | 72 | 0 | 23 | 1 | 99 | 56 | 0 | 251 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 0% | 12% | 1% | 49% | 53% | 0% | 84% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 170 | 100 | 97 | 57 | 110 | 47 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 70 | 3 | 24 | 6 | 63 | 50 | 0 | 216 | |
| % Applied | 41% | 3% | 25% | 11% | 57% | 106% | 0% | 103% | |
| Taken | 70 | 3 | 24 | 6 | 63 | 47 | 0 | 213 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 3% | 25% | 11% | 57% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 110 | 57 | 56 | 37 | 72 | 9 | 150 | 150 |
| Applied | 53 | 2 | 22 | 4 | 63 | 10 | 0 | 154 | |
| % Applied | 48% | 4% | 39% | 11% | 88% | 111% | 0% | 103% | |
| Taken | 53 | 2 | 22 | 4 | 63 | 9 | 0 | 153 | |
| % Taken | 48% | 4% | 39% | 11% | 88% | 100% | 0% | 102% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 41 | 73 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 87 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 22% | 107% | 0% | 0% | 48% | |
| Taken | 71 | 3 | 25 | 8 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 2% | 14% | 20% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 34 | 65 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 80 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 15% | 115% | 0% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 94 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 52% | 0% | 11% | 6% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 49 | 93 | 23 | 11 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 70 | 12 | 0 | 89 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 75% | 52% | 0% | 42% | |
| Taken | 87 | 2 | 23 | 5 | 70 | 12 | 0 | 199 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 1% | 11% | 10% | 75% | 52% | 0% | 95% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 67 | 132 | 35 | 7 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 97 | 28 | 0 | 130 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 73% | 80% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 75 | 2 | 29 | 2 | 97 | 28 | 0 | 233 | |
| % Taken | 31% | 1% | 12% | 3% | 73% | 80% | 0% | 97% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 59 | 113 | 20 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 93 | 23 | 0 | 121 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 82% | 115% | 0% | 50% | |
| Taken | 94 | 0 | 28 | 5 | 93 | 20 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 0% | 12% | 8% | 82% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 62 | 118 | 25 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 94 | 29 | 0 | 129 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 80% | 116% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 99 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 94 | 25 | 0 | 241 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 1% | 6% | 10% | 80% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 55 | 109 | 7 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 102 | 14 | 0 | 117 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 94% | 200% | 0% | 49% | |
| Taken | 113 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 102 | 7 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 0% | 7% | 2% | 94% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 270 | 270 | 270 | 69 | 134 | 24 | 270 | 270 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 110 | 26 | 0 | 140 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 82% | 108% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 102 | 0 | 31 | 4 | 110 | 24 | 0 | 271 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 11% | 6% | 82% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 300 | 300 | 300 | 88 | 175 | 8 | 300 | 300 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 168 | 20 | 0 | 189 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 96% | 250% | 0% | 63% | |
| Taken | 99 | 2 | 23 | 1 | 168 | 8 | 0 | 301 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 1% | 8% | 1% | 96% | 100% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Xingnan Primary School.
"I’m a senior from Xnps now I’m sec 1 the school is literally the best being upper primary feels great a lot of friends to make met some who matches my personality being their friends for 5 years or 3 years still in contact w them but anyways it the best part but the toilet I couldn’t stand the toilet smell the squat toilet is the worst sometime got pad stick to the wall or toilet paper that was mush will thrown on to the wall the girls toilet on level 3 only has 2 sit toilet the rest was squat toilets but still the best primary school on west side 😼"
February 18, 2025
"My daughter just graduated from this school,and when she was p5 her grades werent good but due to her teachers and classmates encouragement she did well in p6"
February 26, 2025
"Such a terrible school, I'm a sec2 and i was an ex student in xingnan, I hated it there people could bully you and get away with it even if the whole school saw what's happening, i had one teacher who can't even teach properly and biased, that school left me so much trauma and bad memories it's no wonder your google ratings are so close to a 3 star. Not to mention i was in a dance cca when i was p3 and the lady there that taught us literally changed $50 for leggings that brakes immediately(it's so obvious it's cheaply made, scamming students to raise your shitty ass school funds is genuinely such a pathetic thing to do, they also fatshammed aswell. Your school is really pathetic and i know I'm not the only one with experiences like this. I'm not sure what's going on in that school right now but im speaking from my experience"
September 29, 2024
"bro js open it during teachers day nga 🙏🙏 iw see old tchrs oso cannot"
February 13, 2025
"All great! Teachers and staff are understanding and helpful. Like the Uniforms & socks and many other facilities. THE TOILETS ARE NASTY & really old. squat toilets?😨😨😨 very dirty & nasty.. my child only pees one time in school as she really couldn’t stand the toilets😭😭"
January 12, 2024
"Uhh its good? But the toilet door sia every time right when I want to go to the toilet I slammed the door, Then BOOM the door was like uh a bit locked ig sooo yeah.. Btw I'm a primary 2."
April 22, 2025