Yew Tee Primary School, a 100% application rate institution, prides itself in catering to parents seeking top-tier education for their children in Singapore. Located conveniently in the heart of Choa Chu Kang, the school boasts a strong focus on fostering academic excellence, alongside holistic development through its distinctive arts and sports programs.
Yew Tee's recent achievement of being recognised for its exceptional STEM program further underscores its commitment to providing a well-rounded learning experience. The school's high application rate reflects its competitiveness and popularity among parents.
Start your child's educational journey with Yew Tee Primary School, where every child is groomed for success.
Yew Tee Primary School
Principal:
Mdm Nur Sabariah Bte Mohd Ibrahim
Vice Principals:
Mr Ng Siok Kwang Andrew, Mdm Toh Guat Hwa Pauline
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Yew Tee MRT Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 150 | 92 | 48 | 144 | 76 | 25 | 25 |
| Applied | 58 | 7 | 1 | 68 | 51 | 0 | 185 | |
| % Applied | 39% | 8% | 2% | 47% | 67% | 0% | 740% | |
| Taken | 58 | 7 | 1 | 68 | 51 | 0 | 185 | |
| % Taken | 39% | 8% | 2% | 47% | 67% | 0% | 740% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 150 | 82 | 44 | 131 | 58 | 50 | 210 |
| Applied | 68 | 10 | 1 | 73 | 8 | 0 | 160 | |
| % Applied | 45% | 12% | 2% | 56% | 14% | 0% | 76% | |
| Taken | 68 | 10 | 1 | 73 | 8 | 0 | 160 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 12% | 2% | 56% | 14% | 0% | 76% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 120 | 67 | 40 | 118 | 74 | 63 | 180 |
| Applied | 53 | 6 | 3 | 45 | 11 | 0 | 118 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 9% | 8% | 38% | 15% | 0% | 66% | |
| Taken | 53 | 6 | 3 | 45 | 11 | 0 | 118 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 9% | 8% | 38% | 15% | 0% | 66% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 150 | 83 | 46 | 138 | 78 | 46 | 210 |
| Applied | 67 | 4 | 1 | 60 | 32 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Applied | 45% | 5% | 2% | 43% | 41% | 0% | 78% | |
| Taken | 67 | 4 | 1 | 60 | 32 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 5% | 2% | 43% | 41% | 0% | 78% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 200 | 128 | 127 | 79 | 155 | 90 | 46 | 240 |
| Applied | 72 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 65 | 44 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Applied | 36% | 1% | 7% | 4% | 42% | 49% | 0% | 81% | |
| Taken | 72 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 65 | 44 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 1% | 7% | 4% | 42% | 49% | 0% | 81% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 200 | 125 | 124 | 77 | 148 | 95 | 50 | 240 |
| Applied | 75 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 53 | 45 | 0 | 191 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 1% | 8% | 9% | 36% | 47% | 0% | 80% | |
| Taken | 75 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 53 | 45 | 0 | 191 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 1% | 8% | 9% | 36% | 47% | 0% | 80% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 140 | 78 | 78 | 55 | 106 | 48 | 10 | 180 |
| Applied | 62 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 58 | 38 | 0 | 170 | |
| % Applied | 44% | 0% | 10% | 7% | 55% | 79% | 0% | 94% | |
| Taken | 62 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 58 | 38 | 0 | 170 | |
| % Taken | 44% | 0% | 10% | 7% | 55% | 79% | 0% | 94% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 73 | 129 | 67 | 33 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 62 | 34 | 0 | 113 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 23% | 48% | 51% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 58 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 62 | 34 | 0 | 177 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 0% | 3% | 23% | 48% | 51% | 0% | 84% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 55 | 105 | 22 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 83 | 24 | 0 | 112 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9% | 79% | 109% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 94 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 83 | 22 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 0% | 3% | 7% | 79% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 57 | 109 | 38 | 28 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 71 | 10 | 0 | 89 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 65% | 26% | 0% | 42% | |
| Taken | 87 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 71 | 10 | 0 | 182 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 4% | 7% | 65% | 26% | 0% | 87% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 210 | 210 | 210 | 51 | 85 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 107 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 106% | 0% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 94 | 0 | 15 | 16 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 210 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 0% | 7% | 31% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 69 | 116 | 9 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 108 | 11 | 0 | 140 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 30% | 93% | 122% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 90 | 0 | 13 | 21 | 107 | 9 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 5% | 30% | 92% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 62 | 87 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 104 | 0 | 0 | 140 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 58% | 120% | 0% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 104 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 43% | 0% | 5% | 58% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 58 | 88 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 139 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 47% | 127% | 0% | 0% | 58% | |
| Taken | 112 | 0 | 13 | 27 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 0% | 5% | 47% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 70 | 117 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 146 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 106% | 0% | 0% | 61% | |
| Taken | 91 | 0 | 10 | 22 | 117 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 4% | 31% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 240 | 240 | 240 | 63 | 114 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 157 | 0 | 0 | 168 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 138% | 0% | 0% | 70% | |
| Taken | 107 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 114 | 0 | 0 | 240 | |
| % Taken | 45% | 0% | 3% | 17% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Yew Tee Primary School.
"My school experience was amazing. The school staff are friendly and approachable and students there are nice and generally kind. The facilities may not be the best, but the school faculty is constantly trying to improve our school environment and conditions. It was great."
December 18, 2024
"This school is alright but the teachers are so biased. Especially when I was in primary 4, my math teacher biased most of the girls. She also gave a lot of gifts for absolutely no reason at all. The toilets are very dirty and there's only 1 clean toilet which is at level 2. Facilities are okay. I remember in around P2, we had this relief teacher and she scolded students for literally no reason. Teachers also scold students for forgetting to bring their homework and asking their parents to sign their papers, making them scared of the teachers sometimes. This isn't going to help the students to remember, it might make them traumatized and unmotivated to go to class."
February 22, 2025
"I mean. This school has no bullying,fighting and any serious offences. Students here are future leaders and they lead the way. Many students like my friend Anuj Ravi went to top elite schools.There are many amenities and can play Nintendo and xbox during recess. The teachers are very kind and friendly. Though the school has a small football field, it is like heaven for me. I studied in this school for 6 years and I love it there. Also the food there is top notch. I recommend trying in the Japanese stall,cool quenchers and the nasi biriyani at the spice oasis. Do try the prata near the beverage stall. Also, four students helped a person suffering from cardiac arrest by giving cpr and calling the ambulance which made the man to be able to live another day.love this school🫶🏻"
February 21, 2025
"highly feculent lavatories ( thou will be able to detect the scent of human urine when entering the filthy toilets ) teachers whom i do not posses the ability to even fathom how they even got hired in the first place ( scream, yell and reprimand me boisterously when i forgot to do/bring/sign my homework. *im not exaggerating*. scolds for other minor things and just cant "brush it off") they're so siao. some are ok lah but majority is just unreasonable The school's not THAT bad. but 6 years of dirty toilets and scoldings will not result in an exceptionally excellent experience. Many will have varying experiences here but this is my honest review of the school."
October 23, 2024
"Everything i know I learnt it from here"
March 22, 2025
"I enjoyed go in to this school but when I was in p3 I used to have a teacher that would throw my worksheets and crush them when I don’t do it or when I submit late he would scold me very badly. Once I brought a small toy to school and lost it, one of my classmates took it without permission and played with it out side of our classroom during recess and some of my friends got called to see him. I was find with that but a little irritated but I didn’t say anything, and when I shrugged he got me to write a apology letter to him saying he didn’t like the fact that I shrugged at him. Overall I enjoyed my school years and my 6 years in the school. During PSLE 2024, one of the invigorator would let her class go first even though they were throwing things around and say “—-(class) show the rest a good example” I didn’t think it was very fair."
October 11, 2024