Yumin Primary School, located in Tampines, Singapore, has an application rate of 100%, indicating its high demand among parents and competitiveness in Primary 1 admissions. The school is renowned for its strong emphasis on holistic education, integrating both academic and co-curricular activities.
Yumin Primary has been recognized for its comprehensive arts program and its recent achievement in the National Primary Schools Chinese Creative Writing Competition is a testament to its commitment to linguistic excellence. With a balanced curriculum and vibrant school culture, Yumin Primary School is a popular choice for parents seeking a well-rounded education for their child in a nurturing environment.
Yumin Primary School
Principal:
Mrs Ng-Teo Sock Hua
Vice Principals:
Mr Abdul Mutalib B Mohammed Amin, Ms Tan Betty
Session Type:
Single Session
Website:
Email:
Nearest MRT:
Tampines MRT Station
School Type:
Government School
Ballot Results
Learn About the Phases Here
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Vacancy | 220 | 149 | 67 | 201 | 191 | 117 | 117 |
| Applied | 71 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 74 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Applied | 32% | 6% | 0% | 5% | 39% | 0% | 140% | |
| Taken | 71 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 74 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Taken | 32% | 6% | 0% | 5% | 39% | 0% | 140% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2024 | Vacancy | 180 | 128 | 59 | 179 | 169 | 61 | 240 |
| Applied | 52 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 108 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Applied | 29% | 8% | 0% | 6% | 64% | 0% | 75% | |
| Taken | 52 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 108 | 0 | 180 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 8% | 0% | 6% | 64% | 0% | 75% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2023 | Vacancy | 160 | 113 | 54 | 161 | 148 | 107 | 220 |
| Applied | 47 | 12 | 0 | 14 | 41 | 0 | 114 | |
| % Applied | 29% | 11% | 0% | 9% | 28% | 0% | 52% | |
| Taken | 47 | 12 | 0 | 14 | 41 | 0 | 114 | |
| % Taken | 29% | 11% | 0% | 9% | 28% | 0% | 52% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2022 | Vacancy | 120 | 60 | 36 | 109 | 89 | 48 | 180 |
| Applied | 60 | 11 | 0 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 132 | |
| % Applied | 50% | 18% | 0% | 18% | 46% | 0% | 73% | |
| Taken | 60 | 11 | 0 | 20 | 41 | 0 | 132 | |
| % Taken | 50% | 18% | 0% | 18% | 46% | 0% | 73% |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Vacancy | 140 | 82 | 82 | 51 | 104 | 76 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 58 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 28 | 85 | 0 | 191 | |
| % Applied | 41% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 27% | 112% | 0% | 106% | |
| Taken | 58 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 28 | 76 | 0 | 182 | |
| % Taken | 41% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 27% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2020 | Vacancy | 140 | 74 | 74 | 50 | 100 | 54 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 66 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 48 | 64 | 0 | 194 | |
| % Applied | 47% | 0% | 20% | 2% | 48% | 119% | 0% | 108% | |
| Taken | 66 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 48 | 54 | 0 | 184 | |
| % Taken | 47% | 0% | 20% | 2% | 48% | 100% | 0% | 102% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2019 | Vacancy | 110 | 68 | 68 | 46 | 93 | 63 | 19 | 150 |
| Applied | 42 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 44 | 0 | 133 | |
| % Applied | 38% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 32% | 70% | 0% | 89% | |
| Taken | 42 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 30 | 44 | 0 | 133 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 32% | 70% | 0% | 89% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2018 | Vacancy | 150 | 150 | 150 | 39 | 77 | 23 | 150 | 150 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 55 | 25 | 0 | 81 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 71% | 109% | 0% | 54% | |
| Taken | 51 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 54 | 23 | 0 | 150 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 14% | 3% | 70% | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2017 | Vacancy | 150 | 150 | 150 | 37 | 74 | 46 | 150 | 150 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 47 | 0 | 76 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 38% | 102% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 57 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 28 | 46 | 0 | 151 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 38% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2016 | Vacancy | 150 | 150 | 150 | 47 | 94 | 66 | 49 | 150 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 17 | 0 | 45 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 30% | 26% | 0% | 30% | |
| Taken | 49 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 28 | 17 | 0 | 102 | |
| % Taken | 33% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 30% | 26% | 0% | 68% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2015 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 48 | 96 | 52 | 33 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 19 | 0 | 63 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 46% | 37% | 0% | 35% | |
| Taken | 65 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 44 | 19 | 0 | 147 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 46% | 37% | 0% | 82% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2014 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 56 | 111 | 76 | 58 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 18 | 0 | 59 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 37% | 24% | 0% | 33% | |
| Taken | 50 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 35 | 18 | 0 | 122 | |
| % Taken | 28% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 32% | 24% | 0% | 68% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2013 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 50 | 99 | 50 | 23 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 20 | 0 | 69 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 49% | 40% | 0% | 38% | |
| Taken | 61 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 49 | 27 | 0 | 157 | |
| % Taken | 34% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 49% | 54% | 0% | 87% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2012 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 48 | 96 | 47 | 17 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 30 | 0 | 80 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 52% | 64% | 0% | 44% | |
| Taken | 68 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 50 | 30 | 0 | 164 | |
| % Taken | 38% | 0% | 9% | 0% | 52% | 64% | 0% | 91% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2011 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 180 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 45 | 0 | 96 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 51% | 90% | 0% | 53% | |
| Taken | 67 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 51 | 50 | 0 | 181 | |
| % Taken | 37% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 51% | 100% | 0% | 101% | |
| Year | Phase 1 | 2A(1) | 2A(2) | 2B | 2C | 2C(S) | 3 | Total | |
| 2010 | Vacancy | 180 | 180 | 180 | 52 | 102 | 46 | 10 | 180 |
| Applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 57 | 33 | 0 | 91 | |
| % Applied | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 56% | 72% | 0% | 51% | |
| Taken | 65 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 57 | 33 | 0 | 168 | |
| % Taken | 36% | 0% | 7% | 2% | 56% | 72% | 0% | 93% |
Google Reviews!
Hear from parents about their experiences with Yumin Primary School.
"My child is very happy going to school everyday. She says her classmates are the best in the world. She also enjoys the many interesting school programs designed for her cohort. As a parent I don’t have to worry about her mental well being which is is tip top . This is priceless and I’m glad I have found the right school for her."
March 12, 2025
"wang xiangbo help me pass my exams by teaching me"
March 11, 2025
"Was a student here 5 years ago, education was alright but the teachers need to control thier temper. Some scold for a small mistake in homework and there was one Chinese teacher who is racist against my Indian friend as she kept scolding her when she did nothing. Also, in primary one the teacher threw our homework on the ground for us to collect them. Now that I think back I feel like we were being treated as animals. Furthermore , the recess time was really short, keeps decreasing year by year. 30 mins recess but need to assemble 10 minutes earlier, and many teachers just love to delay students' dismissal, hence we end up with 10-15 minutes of recess time, that's an unnecessary discipline measure. I hope these have changed over the years."
June 18, 2023
"Yumin pri is a good school. good students and good Tchers. One thing is Mr Tim kiew pls come back to NCPSSS"
June 21, 2024
"I have just graduated from yumin primary I love Yumin miss julee miss nizam mr Adil and the the goes on they are Soo caring the buy you boba McDonald’s if you pass exams join Yumin YOU WILL NOT REGRET love Yumin ❤️❤️❤️❤️"
November 26, 2023
"I just graduated and I can say YMPS is a good school, the teachers are really nice especially Ms Kang, ms Luo, and mdm Hirwati were really fun teachers and many of them were really kind. I really miss YMPS and my chaotic class which always got scolded for being too noisy🙃🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂 but nonetheless I feel that this school is amazing and the support was crazy💗 however like no offence to Mrs ng but I really miss mdm rao😭she was so kind and nice🥺 and ummm there is one thing that I didn’t really like😬 it’s the recess timing😭😭😭WE ONLY HAD 30 MIN AND WE NEEDED TO GATHER 10 MIN BEFORE IT ENDED SO WE ONLY HAD LIKE15-20 MIN😭😭😭also I don’t really like how the school looks like THAT I prefer the style before now the school some more got pic of students on the wall outside like UHHH and I don’t like the new uniform either the last time one was better🙃but still y’all can come to YMPS trustttt"
March 26, 2025